1. Conflict-free railway track assignment at depots
- Author
-
Thomas Schlechte, Joseph Paat, Alexander Tesch, Rosemarie Martienssen, Brady Gilg, Senan Seymen, Torsten Klug, and Christof Schulz
- Subjects
050210 logistics & transportation ,Mathematical optimization ,Engineering ,021103 operations research ,business.industry ,05 social sciences ,0211 other engineering and technologies ,Transportation ,02 engineering and technology ,Management Science and Operations Research ,Track (rail transport) ,Computer Science Applications ,Shunting ,FIFO and LIFO accounting ,Modeling and Simulation ,0502 economics and business ,Train ,business ,Assignment problem ,Integer programming ,Conflict free ,Simulation ,Civil and Structural Engineering - Abstract
Managing rolling stock with no passengers aboard is a critical component of railway operations. One aspect of managing rolling stock is to park the rolling stock on a given set of tracks at the end of a day or service. Depending on the parking assignment, shunting may be required in order for a parked train to depart or for an incoming train to park. Given a collection of tracks ℳ and a collection of trains T with a fixed arrival-departure timetable, the train assignment problem (TAP) is to determine the maximum number of trains from T that can be parked on ℳ according to the timetable and without the use of shunting. Hence, efficiently solving the TAP allows to quickly compute feasible parking schedules that do not require further shunting adjustments. In this paper, we show that the TAP is NP-hard and present two integer programming models for solving the TAP. We compare both models on a theoretical level. Moreover, to our knowledge, we consider the first approach that integrates track lengths along with the three most common types of parking tracks FIFO, LIFO and FREE tracks in a common model. Furthermore, to optimize against uncertainty in the arrival times of the trains we extend our models by stochastic and robust modeling techniques. We conclude by giving computational results for both models, observing that they perform well on real timetables.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF