Search

Background: Since 2008 primary care physicians (GPs) in our region have been allowed open access to knee MRI scans. There are questions about whether this changes referral practice and if it is an effective use of resources. Purpose: To describe the change in demographics of patients referred for knee MRI following implementation of a new referral pathway. Study Type: Retrospective observational study. Population: All primary care referrals between 2008 and 2015 for knee MRI from a population of 900,000. Field Strength/Sequence: Not applicable. Assessment: Demographic profile and number of knee MRI referrals and subsequent arthroscopies. Statistical Tests: Comparisons between urban and rural populations used the t-test. Test for normality used Shapiro–Wilks. Comparison between abnormal MRI proportions used a chi-squared test. Results: There were 23,928 knee MRI referrals (10,695 from GPs) between 2000 and 2015. MRI knee referrals rose from 210 in 2008 to 2379 in 2015. The average age of the patient decreased from 46.8 (SD = 14.9) in 2008 to 41.3 (SD = 14.7) in 2015. Conversion to arthroscopy declined from 15.4% to 10.2%, but there was no significant change in abnormal scan proportion. Conversion rates showed no significant difference between rural (9.6%) and urban populations (10.5%). Referral rates were significantly higher in low socioeconomic status areas (47.3% vs. 34.6%). The median referral rate per 1000 patients was 13.8 (interquartile range = 8.4). Referral rates varied widely between practices. Data Conclusion: Despite a large rise in knee MRI referrals from primary care, there has been no substantial change in the age profile, suggesting that there has been no increase in inappropriate referral of elderly patients in whom MRI is unlikely to influence management. A modest decrease in the conversion rate to arthroscopy may be reasonably offset against a decrease in secondary care referrals. Socioeconomic status of the target population must be considered when planning primary care knee MRI services. Level of Evidence: 4. Technical Efficacy Stage: 6. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) texture analysis is a method of analyzing subchondral bone alterations in osteoarthritis (OA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between MR texture analysis and ground-truth subchondral bone histomorphometry at the tibial plateau. DESIGN: The local research ethics committee approved the study. All subjects provided written, informed consent. This was a cross-sectional study carried out at our institution between February and August 2014. Ten participants aged 57-84 with knee OA scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) underwent pre-operative MRI of the symptomatic knee at 3T using a high spatial-resolution coronal T1 weighted sequence. Tibial plateau explants obtained at the time of TKA underwent histological preparation to allow calculation of bone volume fraction (BV.TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) and trabecular number (Tb.N). Texture analysis was performed on the tibial subchondral bone of MRI images matched to the histological sections. Regression models were created to assess the association of texture analysis features with BV.TV, Tb.Th, Tb.Sp and Tb.N. RESULTS: MRI texture features were significantly associated with BV.TV (R2 = 0.76), Tb.Th (R2 = 0.47), Tb.Sp (R2 = 0.75) and Tb.N (R2 = 0.60, all P < 0.001). Simple gray-value histogram based texture features demonstrated the highest standardized regression coefficients for each model. CONCLUSION: MRI texture analysis features were significantly associated with ground-truth subchondral bone histomorphometry at the tibial plateau.

Purpose To measure the test–retest reliability of rapid (

To determine the feasibility of MRI texture analysis as a method of quantifying subchondral bone architecture in knee osteoarthritis (OA). Asymptomatic subjects aged 20–30 (group 1, n = 10), symptomatic patients aged 40–50 (group 2, n = 10) and patients scheduled for knee replacement aged 55–85 (group 3, n = 10) underwent high spatial resolution T1-weighted coronal 3T knee MRI. Regions of interest were created in the medial (MT) and lateral (LT) tibial subchondral bone from which 20 texture parameters were calculated. T2 mapping of the tibial cartilage was performed in groups 1 and 2. Mean parameter values were compared between groups using ANOVA. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) was used to evaluate the ability of texture analysis to classify subjects correctly. Significant differences in 18/20 and 12/20 subchondral bone texture parameters were demonstrated between groups at the MT and LT respectively. There was no significant difference in mean MT or LT cartilage T2 values between group 1 and group 2. LDA demonstrated subject classification accuracy of 97 % (95 % CI 91–100 %). MRI texture analysis of tibial subchondral bone may allow detection of alteration in subchondral bone architecture in OA. This has potential applications in understanding OA pathogenesis and assessing response to treatment. • Improved techniques to monitor OA disease progression and treatment response are desirable • Subchondral bone (SB) may play significant role in the development of OA • MRI texture analysis is a method of quantifying changes in SB architecture • Pilot study showed that this technique is feasible and reliable • Significant differences in SB texture were demonstrated between individuals with/without OA

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare two different methods of quantitative assessment of tibial subchondral bone in osteoarthritis (OA): statistical texture analysis (sTA) and trabecular microarchitecture analysis (tMA). METHODS: Asymptomatic controls aged 20-30 (n = 10), patients aged 40-50 with chronic knee pain but without established OA (n = 10) and patients aged 55-85 with advanced OA scheduled for knee replacement (n = 10) underwent knee MR imaging at 3 Tesla with a three-dimensional gradient echo sequence to allow sTA and tMA. tMA and sTA features were calculated using region of interest creation in the medial (MT) and lateral (LT) tibial subchondral bone. Features were compared between groups using one-way analysis of variance. The two most discriminating tMA and sTA features were used to construct exploratory discriminant functions to assess the ability of the two methods to classify participants. RESULTS: No tMA features were significantly different between groups at either MT or LT. 17/20 and 11/20 sTA features were significantly different between groups at the MT/LT, respectively (P

PURPOSE: To define the range of quantitative pharmacokinetic parameters in normal-healing bone with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). DCE-MRI is an established technique for characterizing abnormal tissue microvasculature within solid tumors, but has also shown promise for assessing bone and bone marrow. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study ethical approval for eight patients was obtained. Inclusion criteria were an extra-articular distal radial fracture in patients aged 20-50 years which had united by 6 weeks in plaster cast. This was assessed by an experienced orthopedic surgeon. DCE-MRI was performed at 1.5T 6 weeks after initial injury. The transfer constant (K(trans) ), transfer rate (Kep ), and initial area under the curve (IAUC) values for the fracture site and adjacent marrow were obtained for each patient. RESULTS: The mean T1 , K(trans) , Kep , and IAUC at the fracture site were 1713 (standard deviation [SD] 645), 0.09 (SD 0.07), 0.17 (SD 0.17) and 4.9 (SD 4.4). The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the fracture site ranged from 0.38 to 0.97 and for the adjacent marrow ranged from 0.95-3.88. Within each patient the range of RSDs was 0.04-0.42 for T1 , 0.26-0.91 for K(trans) , 0.14-1.06 for Kep , and 0.35-0.96 for the IAUC. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetic measures of perfusion can be obtained from healing fractures using DCE-MRI with "excellent" intraclass correlation coefficients for inter- and intrarater reliability. The use of these perfusion parameters is limited by wide patient-to-patient variation and slice-to-slice variation within patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015.

Aim To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived breast density measurements using automatic segmentation algorithms with radiologist estimations using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) density classification. Materials and methods Forty women undergoing mammography and dynamic breast MRI as part of their clinical management were recruited. Fat–water separated MRI images derived from a two-point Dixon technique, phase-sensitive reconstruction, and atlas-based segmentation were obtained before and after intravenous contrast medium administration. Breast density was assessed using software from Advanced MR Analytics (AMRA), Linkoping, Sweden, with results compared to the widely used four-quartile quantitative BI-RADS scale. Results The proportion of glandular tissue in the breast on MRI was derived from the AMRA sequence. The mean unenhanced breast density was 0.31±0.22 (mean±SD; left) and 0.29±0.21 (right). Mean breast density on post-contrast images was 0.32±0.19 (left) and 0.32±0.2 (right). There was “almost perfect” correlation between pre- and post-contrast breast density quantification: Spearman's correlation rho=0.98 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.97–0.99; left) and rho=0.99 (95% CI: 0.98–0.99; right). The 95% limits of agreement were −0.11–0.08 (left) and −0.08–0.03 (right). Interobserver reliability for BI-RADS was “substantial”: weighted Kappa k=0.8 (95% CI: 0.74–0.87). The Spearman correlation coefficient between BI-RADS and MRI breast density was rho=0.73 (95% CI: 0.60–0.82; left) and rho=0.75 (95% CI: 0.63–0.83; right) which was also “substantial”. Conclusion The AMRA sequence provides a fully automated, reproducible, objective assessment of fibroglandular breast tissue proportion that correlates well with mammographic assessment of breast density with the added advantage of avoidance of ionising radiation.