Search

INTRODUCTION: While most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) receive therapy shortly after diagnosis, a subset of patients with indolent-behaving disease can safely defer treatment. In this subgroup, we evaluated the importance of treatment intensity in patients with MCL who defer initial therapy. METHODS: Out of 1134 patients with MCL from 12 academic centers, we analyzed 219 patients who initiated therapy at least 90 days after diagnosis. Patients who received induction with high-dose cytarabine and/or autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in first remission were considered to have received intensive therapy (n = 88) while all other approaches were non-intensive (n = 131). RESULTS: There was no difference in progression-free (PFS; P = .224) or overall survival (OS; P = .167) in deferred patients who received non-intensive vs. intensive therapy. Additionally, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were performed for PFS and OS. Treatment at an academic center (HR 0.43, P = .015) was associated with improved OS in both univariate and multivariate models, while intensity of treatment was not associated with improved OS in either model. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that intensified initial treatment is not associated with improved survival after deferring initial therapy, although prospective studies are needed to determine which of these patients with MCL may benefit from intensive therapy.

Background The impact of using adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma is not known. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy following complete cytoreduction in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Methods Retrospective medical record review of all patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma treated at our institution between 2006 and 2015. Kaplan‐Meier plots were used to summarize overall survival (OS) and relapse‐free survival over time, and log‐rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used to test for differences in survival between groups. Results A total of 103 patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma received care at our institution during the study period. Complete cytoreduction (cytoreductive score 0‐1) was achieved in 68 patients (66%). Of these 68 patients, 26 received adjuvant chemotherapy. The most common regimens were capecitabine (n = 11), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (n = 7), and 5‐FU plus oxaliplatin (n = 6). Tumor histopathology and grade, and the ability to achieve complete cytoreduction were significant predictors of overall survival. The median OS for non–low‐grade and well‐differentiated tumor patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy following complete cytoreduction was 9.03 years, compared to 2.88 years for patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (P = .02). Among low‐grade and well‐differentiated tumor patients who underwent complete cytoreduction, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between those who received adjuvant chemotherapy and those who did not. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy seems to have benefit in appendiceal cancer patients with non–low‐grade or well‐differentiated tumor type but not in low‐grade or well‐differentiated tumors., The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy following complete cytoreduction in various histopathological subtypes of appendiceal cancer remains unknown. This retrospective study shows that adjuvant chemotherapy has benefit only in moderate‐ to high‐grade and signet‐ring type adenocarcinomas but not in low‐grade and well‐differentiated appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

Following the 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines, we changed our practice from using high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC-3 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5) to intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC-1·5 g/m2 q12h-D1,3,5/D1-3) for consolidation in young(

Small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive solid tumors, and the prognosis has not improved significantly in 25 years. Despite a recent understanding of the genomic aberrations seen in SCLC, these insights have not led to any breakthroughs in treatment. We present a patient with SCLC harboring a novel MYCL1 fusion protein who experienced a prolonged disease course due to the use of Aurora A kinase inhibitor and subsequently nivolumab. MYC family genes are master regulators of several cellular pathways including proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis and recently have been shown to be involved in tumor immune evasion. Large studies have shown that a significant proportion of patients with SCLC have amplification or overexpression of MYC family genes. Preclinical data have exposed vulnerability of MYC-driven tumors to Aurora kinase inhibitors, bromodomain and extraterminal domain inhibitors, and recently to immune checkpoint blockers. Further studies using these agents with selective enrolling of patients with MYC-altered tumors are warranted to exploit these vulnerabilities.

Background: Radiation exposure is a serious concern with usage of serial multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans (7.8mSv/study) for chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity (CRC) screening. The current practice with respect to the imaging modalities chosen for cardiotoxicity screening and related radiation exposure has not been studied. Materials and Methods: We performed a serial cross-sectional study from 2011 to 2014, evaluating the relative usage of the three imaging modalities for CRC screening. Results: MUGA scan usage decreased from 30.4% to 16.7%, echocardiogram (Echo) utilization increased from 68.7% to 80.4% and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) usage increased from 0.9% to 2.9% in the 4-year period. Estimated total radiation exposure and secondary cancer risk can increase significantly in certain subgroups when MUGA scan is employed for serial cardiac imaging. Conclusion: Increased awareness of radiation risks from MUGA, as well as increasing focus on early detection of cardiotoxicity using Echo and CMR, are possible reasons behind the observed trends.

Introduction CALGB study in 1994 reported improved leukemia free survival (LFS) with sequential courses of high dose cytarabine (HIDAC- 3 gm/m2, q12h on days 1, 3 and 5) compared to lower doses of 100 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2 per day. Following this study, HIDAC has been commonly used for chemotherapy consolidation in AML patients 60 years or younger. More recently, several groups investigated the role of intermediate dose cytarabine (IDAC-1.5 gm/m2 q12h D 1, 3 and 5 or D 1-3) in this population and reported equivalent outcomes for IDAC compared to HIDAC (Table 1). ELN guidelines published in January 2017 recommend IDAC for consolidation therapy in young ( Methods Patients 60 years or younger with ELN favorable risk AML between 2004 and 2015 at SGH and between September 2015 and March 2018 at UMMC, who underwent induction therapy with 7+3 regimen (idarubicin 12 mg/m2 D1-3 or daunorubicin 60 - 90 mg/m2 and cytarabine 100 mg/m2 continuous infusion from D1-7) and consolidation with cytarabine monotherapy were identified. These dates were chosen to allow reasonably equal time distribution before and after change in our practice. We extracted relevant outcomes data using chart review. We used Chi-square testing and applied Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to detect differences in relapse and survival outcomes. Results Of 67 ELN favorable risk patients 60 years or younger, 42 received HIDAC and 25 received IDAC. Median age was 39 years (range 16-59). 64 patients received 1 induction cycle and 3 patients received 2 induction cycles to achieve complete remission. Median LFS and overall survival (OS) with HIDAC vs IDAC were not-reached (NR, median time for follow up = 6.9 years) vs 1.35 years (p=0.004) and NR vs 2.27 years (p=0.001) respectively (Figure 1). Cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years was 23.8% for HIDAC and 60% for IDAC groups (p=0.003). 3-year LFS and OS for HIDAC vs IDAC groups were 71% vs 36% (p=0.06) and 90% vs 48% (p=0.002). Discussion Historical data suggests chemotherapy consolidation with 3-4 cycles of HIDAC achieves long-term LFS of 60 - 70 % in young favorable risk AML patients. While the outcomes in HIDAC group in this study are comparable to historical data with good outcomes, a significantly larger proportion of patients in the IDAC group had early relapse (60%) and death. A major difference between the patients in this study and the other studies which showed similar outcomes with HIDAC and IDAC is the mode of induction. Data from large randomized studies in AML (Table 1) that suggest similar efficacy of IDAC compared to HIDAC used higher intensity induction regimens (frequently double induction therapy) compared to 7+3 and/or used other agents in combination with Ara-C for consolidation. These data are not broadly applicable in patients who receive a single cycle of 7+3 for induction, when selecting dose of Ara-C as monotherapy for consolidation. Furthermore, studies that used 7+3 for induction therapy showed benefit for HIDAC compared with multi-agent chemotherapy that included IDAC (Table 1). Conclusion Using single agent IDAC for post remission therapy is associated with higher rates of relapse and poor overall survival compared to HIDAC among young, ELN favorable risk AML patients who achieve complete remission following 7+3. The large randomized studies that suggested equivalency of IDAC to HIDAC for post remission therapy in AML patients, either used more than one cycle of intensive induction regimen and/or used cytarabine in combination with an anthracycline for consolidation. Hence, ELN guidelines should be cautiously interpreted given the above limitations in generalizability. Our study suggests that HIDAC, rather than IDAC, is the preferred chemotherapy consolidation regimen in young, favorable risk AML patients following standard 7+3 induction. Foot note: BK & NAAH contributed equally. FH & ZL contributed equally. Disclosures Kolla: Amgen: Equity Ownership. Weisdorf:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Incyte: Research Funding; Fate Therapeutics: Consultancy.

e19070 Background: Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are a rare heterogenous group of lymphomas and modern studies on incidence patterns of PTCL are lacking. Methods: Using the National Program of Cancer registries (NPCR) database, which covers 99% of the US population, we aim to evaluate the incidence of PTCL according to age, race-ethnicity, and gender; and examine trends over time. We identified PTCL using ICD-O-3 codes and evaluated incidence trends from 2001 to 2015. Results: A total of 78722 PTCL cases were identified, the most common were Mycoses fungoides/Sezary syndrome (MF-SS), PTCL Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), and ALK+ Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALK+ ALCL). The age-adjusted incidence rate was 2.1 per 100,000. Incidence of PTCL increased with age (6.7/100,000 in 80+years). PTCL was more common in males than females (incidence rate ratio [IRR] of 0.6, p

Background Checkpoint inhibitors are a class of agents that employ host’s adaptive immune defenses in fighting cancer. With many new indications and several ongoing clinical trials in a variety of malignancies, the usage of these agents is set to increase significantly. One of the key challenges patients and physicians face while using these drugs is with the appropriate assessment of response to therapy. Case presentation We are reporting two patients with lung cancer who were treated with nivolumab and experienced rapidly accumulating recurrent pleural effusions requiring multiple thoracenteses (6 and 4 times each for patient 1 and 2 respectively) with in the first few weeks of initiation of therapy and also developed pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. Both patients had prior history of malignant spread to pleural and pericardial space in their disease course. Therapy was continued in the first patient with spontaneous resolution of effusions after 8 weeks and the disease showed near complete response to treatment on imaging at 16 weeks. Second patient declined to continue further treatment with nivolumab after 3 cycles due to recurrent effusions and cardiac tamponade, although there was some evidence of clinical response at discontinuation. Conclusions Patients with history of malignant involvement of visceral spaces should be monitored closely for rapidly accumulating effusions and particularly for cardiac tamponade, after initiation of therapy with nivolumab. This presentation could represent pseudoprogression, and continuation of therapy with close monitoring is prudent as long as effusions are manageable and there is no definitive evidence of progression elsewhere.

8517 Background: SCLC and L-LCNEC are aggressive neoplasms that are both associated with smoking history and are thought to overlap in clinical, histogenetic, and genomic features. We reviewed the genomic profiles of >1187 patients to assess the genomic similarities of these diseases. Methods: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumors from 300 L-LCNEC and 887 SCLC patients in the course of clinical care was performed to suggest pathways to benefit from therapy. Results: Commonly altered genes in both diseases included TP53, RB1, MYC/MYCL1, MLL2, LRP1B and PTEN; alterations in other genes occurred at somewhat differing frequencies (table). For both diseases, RB1 mutation significantly co-occurred with TP53 mutations (p