1. Working with entrustable professional activities in clinical education in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review
- Author
-
Andrea Cantisani, Severin Pinilla, Sören Huwendiek, Stefan Klöppel, Eric Lenouvel, Christoph Nissen, and Werner Strik
- Subjects
Scoping review ,020205 medical informatics ,Entrustable professional activities ,education ,Graduate medical education ,lcsh:Medicine ,610 Medicine & health ,Context (language use) ,02 engineering and technology ,Undergraduate medical education ,Education ,Formative assessment ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Empirical research ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Curriculum development ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Curriculum ,health care economics and organizations ,Medical education ,lcsh:LC8-6691 ,lcsh:Special aspects of education ,lcsh:R ,Internship and Residency ,General Medicine ,Competency-Based Education ,Clinical education ,Summative assessment ,Data extraction ,Education, Medical, Graduate ,lipids (amino acids, peptides, and proteins) ,Clinical Competence ,Educational Measurement ,370 Education ,Psychology ,Education, Medical, Undergraduate ,Research Article - Abstract
Background Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are increasingly used in undergraduate medical education (UME). We conducted a scoping review to summarize the evidence for the use of EPAs in clinical rotations in UME. Methods We searched multiple databases for scoping reviews based on the PRISMA guidelines for articles reporting qualitative and quantitative research, as well as conceptual and curriculum development reports, on EPAs in UME clinical rotations. Results We identified 3309 records by searching through multiple databases. After the removal of duplicates, 1858 reports were screened. A total of 36 articles were used for data extraction. Of these, 47% reported on EPA and EPA-based curriculum development for clerkships, 50% reported on implementation strategies, and 53% reported on assessment methods and tools used in clerkships. Validity frameworks for developing EPAs in the context of clerkships were inconsistent. Several specialties reported feasible implementation strategies for EPA-based clerkship curricula, however, these required additional faculty time and resources. Limited exposure to clinical activities was identified as a barrier to relevant learning experiences. Educators used nationally defined, or specialty-specific EPAs, and a range of entrustability and supervision scales. We found only one study that used an empirical research approach for EPA assessment. One article reported on the earlier advancement of trainees from UME to graduate medical education based on summative entrustment decisions. Conclusions There is emerging evidence concerning how EPAs can be effectively introduced to clinical training in UME. Specialty-specific, nested EPAs with context-adapted, entrustment-supervision scales might be helpful in better leveraging their formative assessment potential.
- Published
- 2021