Search

Objectives To compare the CARG (Cancer and Aging Research Group) and CRASH (Chemotherapy Risk Assessment Scale for High-Age Patients) score regarding the predictive performance for severe toxicity in older patients with cancer. Methods We recruited patients ≥70 years and applied the CARG and CRASH score before the start of systemic cancer treatment. The CARG predicts severe overall toxicity; the CRASH additionally predicts hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. We captured ≥ grade 3 toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) from medical records. Predictive performance was assessed using logistic regression and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). Results The study cohort comprised 120 patients (50% female, mean age 77.2 years, 57% solid tumors). The median of the CARG (range 0–23) and the combined CRASH (range 0–12) were 9 and 8, respectively. 81% of patients experienced toxicity; 67% showed hematologic toxicity. The predictive performance of the CARG and the combined CRASH was similar for overall toxicity (CARG: Odds ratio per unit increase (OR) 1.266, P = .015; ROC-AUC 0.681, P = .010; combined CRASH: OR 1.337, P = .029; ROC-AUC 0.650, P = .032). For hematologic toxicity, the hematologic CRASH was a significant predictor and showed numerically a higher ROC-AUC than the CARG which was not statistically different (CARG: OR 1.048, P = .462; ROC-AUC 0.564, P = .271; hematologic CRASH: OR 1.602, P = .007; ROC-AUC 0.665, P = .005). Conclusion Both scores exhibited similar predictive performance for toxicity in older patients with cancer.

Aims Low blood concentrations of the naturally occurring amino acid L-homoarginine (L-hArg) are related to impaired cardiovascular outcome and mortality in humans and animals. L-hArg is a weak substrate of nitric oxide synthase and an inhibitor of arginases in vitro. The aim of our study was to obtain kinetic and dynamic data after oral L-hArg supplementation. Methods In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study, 20 young volunteers received 125 mg L-hArg once daily for 4 weeks. Kinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-24h) were calculated after ingestion of single and multiple doses of oral supplementation as primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints that were evaluated were routine laboratory, L-arginine, asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), pulse wave velocity (PWV), augmentation index (AIx), flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD), corticospinal excitability, i.e. motor threshold (MT), and cortical excitability, i.e. intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF). Results One hour after ingestion (Tmax), L-hArg increased the baseline L-hArg plasma concentration (2.87 ± 0.91 μmol l−1, mean ± SD) by 8.74 ± 4.46 [95% confidence intervals 6.65; 10.9] and 17.3 ± 4.97 [14.9; 19.6] μmol l−1 (Cmax), after single and multiple doses, respectively. Once-only and 4 weeks of supplementation resulted in AUCs0-24h of 63.5 ± 28.8 [50.0; 76.9] and 225 ± 78.5 [188; 2624] μmol l−1*h, for single and multiple doses, respectively. Routine laboratory parameters, L-arginine, ADMA, PWV, AIx, FMD, MT, ICI and ICF did not change by L-hArg supplementation compared to baseline. Conclusion Once daily orally applied 125 mg L-hArg raises plasma L-hArg four- and sevenfold after single dose and 4 weeks of supplementation, respectively, and is safe and well tolerated in young volunteers.