1. Higher-Valency Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines: An Exploratory Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in U.S. Seniors
- Author
-
Richard K. Zimmerman, Chyongchiou J. Lin, Lee H. Harrison, Mary Patricia Nowalk, William Schaffner, Kenneth J. Smith, and Angela R. Wateska
- Subjects
Immunity, Herd ,Serotype ,Epidemiology ,Cost effectiveness ,Cost-Benefit Analysis ,complex mixtures ,01 natural sciences ,Pneumococcal Infections ,Article ,Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine ,Herd immunity ,Pneumococcal Vaccines ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,stomatognathic system ,Environmental health ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,Humans ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,0101 mathematics ,Child ,Aged ,Vaccines, Conjugate ,Cost–benefit analysis ,business.industry ,Vaccination ,010102 general mathematics ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Cost-effectiveness analysis ,Quality-adjusted life year ,Quality-Adjusted Life Years ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Introduction Use of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in nonimmunocompromised adults aged ≥65 years is controversial. Higher-valency conjugate vaccines (15-valent and 20-valent ) are under development; their potential cost effectiveness in older adults is unknown, particularly when potential indirect (herd immunity) effects from childhood vaccination are considered. Methods A Markov model estimated the cost effectiveness of current U.S. recommendations and alternative strategies using currently available and in-development pneumococcal conjugate vaccines in seniors. Separately, strategies using a hypothetical 20-valent vaccine adding the 7 most common disease-causing non–13-valent vaccine serotypes were considered. Sensitivity analyses were performed and alternative scenarios were examined. Data were gathered and the analyses were performed in 2020. Results In analyses considering only existing and in-development vaccines, sole 20-valent vaccine use cost $172,491/quality-adjusted life year gained compared with current U.S. recommendations under baseline assumptions (equal serotype effectiveness and no childhood vaccination indirect effects). Strategies using 15-valent vaccine were more costly and less effective. When 13-valent/20-valent vaccines were assumed ineffective against pneumococcal serotype 3 and 15-valent vaccine was fully effective, 15-valent vaccine cost $237,431/quality-adjusted life year gained. With indirect effects considered, 15-valent or 20-valent vaccine cost >$449,000/quality-adjusted life year gained. When adding hypothetical 20-valent vaccine under baseline assumptions, hypothetical 20-valent vaccine cost $139,348/quality-adjusted life year gained. Conclusions In-development pneumococcal conjugate vaccines may be economically unreasonable in older adults, regardless of serotype effectiveness assumptions, particularly when considering potential indirect effects from use of those vaccines in children. Adult vaccines containing high-risk serotypes not contained in childhood vaccines may be more promising.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF