Search

Introducción y objetivos: A pesar de los avances en el tratamiento del infarto agudo de miocardio (IAM), este sigue presentando un pronóstico desfavorable. Hay poca evidencia acerca de la evolución de los pacientes con IAM y enfermedad coronavírica de 2019 (COVID-19). El objetivo del estudio es describir la presentación clínica, las complicaciones y los factores predictores de mortalidad hospitalaria en pacientes con IAM durante el brote de COVID-19 en España. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio de cohortes, prospectivo y multicéntrico de todos los pacientes consecutivos con IAM en tratamiento invasivo durante el brote de COVID-19 (15 de marzo a 15 de abril de 2020). Se compararon las características clínicas de los pacientes positivos para COVID-19 con las de los negativos, y se evaluó el efecto de la COVID-19 en la mortalidad mediante emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión y regresión logística. Resultados: Se incluyó a 187 pacientes con IAM: 111 con elevación del segmento ST y 76 sin elevación. De ellos, 32 (17%) resultaron positivos para COVID-19. Las puntuaciones GRACE y Killip-Kimball y varios marcadores inflamatorios resultaron significativamente mayores en los pacientes con COVID-19. La mortalidad total y la cardiovascular fueron significativamente mayores en los pacientes con COVID-19: el 25 frente al 3,8% (p 140 (OR = 23,45; IC95%, 2,52-62,51; p = 0,005) y la COVID-19 (OR = 6,61; IC95%, 1,82-24,43; p = 0,02) resultaron factores independientes de mortalidad hospitalaria. Conclusiones: Durante el brote epidémico, la puntuación GRACE elevada y la COVID-19 fueron los factores independientes de mortalidad hospitalaria en los pacientes con IAM.

A 69-year-old man with a history of coronary artery ectasia, potentially resulting from an underlying heritable connective tissue disorder, presented with ventricular fibrillation. Despite medical management of ischemia, he developed recurrent ventricular tachycardia with poor neurological recovery. We highlight challenges in the management of coronary artery ectasia. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.), Graphical abstract, A 69-year-old man with a history of coronary artery ectasia, potentially resulting from an underlying heritable connective tissue disorder, presented…

Arteriovenous (AV) fistulae for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease usually prevents ipsilateral transradial access (TRA) for coronary angiography. We present a case of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via left TRA with navigation through a dormant AV fistula in a patient with limited vascular access. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.), Graphical abstract, Arteriovenous (AV) fistulae for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease usually prevents ipsilateral transradial access (TRA) for…

Objective: To assess the effects of weekend admission vs weekday admission on the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Adult ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) hospital admissions were identified using the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (2000-2016). Interhospital transfers were excluded. Timing of coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) relative to the day of admission was identified. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, receipt of early CA, timing of CA and PCI, resource utilization, and discharge disposition for weekend vs weekday admissions. Results: Of the 9,041,819 AMI admissions, 2,406,876 (26.6%) occurred on weekends. Compared with 2000, in 2016 there was an increase in weekend STEMI (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16; P

Introduction and objectives Despite advances in treatment, patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still exhibit unfavorable short- and long-term prognoses. In addition, there is scant evidence about the clinical outcomes of patients with AMI and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation, complications, and risk factors for mortality in patients admitted for AMI during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods This prospective, multicenter, cohort study included all consecutive patients with AMI who underwent coronary angiography in a 30-day period corresponding chronologically with the COVID-19 outbreak (March 15 to April 15, 2020). Clinical presentations and outcomes were compared between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. The effect of COVID-19 on mortality was assessed by propensity score matching and with a multivariate logistic regression model. Results In total, 187 patients were admitted for AMI, 111 with ST-segment elevation AMI and 76 with non-ST-segment elevation AMI. Of these, 32 (17%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. GRACE score, Killip-Kimball classification, and several inflammatory markers were significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients. Total and cardiovascular mortality were also significantly higher in COVID-19-positive patients (25% vs 3.8% [P 140 (OR, 23.45; 95%CI, 2.52–62.51; P = .005) and COVID-19 (OR, 6.61; 95%CI, 1.82-24.43; P = .02) were independent predictors of in-hospital death. Conclusions During this pandemic, a high GRACE score and COVID-19 were independent risk factors associated with higher in-hospital mortality.

Highlights • AAA is frequently associated with CAD in elderly patients. • The optimal management of CAD associated with AAA in an octogenarian is a challenge. • Combined CABG and EVAR is a promising way to improve the therapeutic efficiency., Introduction Coronary artery disease (CAD) is commonly associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) in elderly patients. When severe CAD requiring coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with an impending AAA in a high-risk patient, the options for the suitable timing of CABG and AAA repair strategy (one-stage or two-stage) are still being debated. Presentation of case An 87-year-old man with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and a giant abdominal aortic aneurysm was transferred to our centre. Coronary angiography revealed triple-vessel coronary disease, and computed tomography confirmed a giant infrarenal fusiform abdominal aortic aneurysm 9 cm in maximal diameter. We simultaneously performed endovascular aneurysm repair prior to on-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the 15th postoperative day. Conclusion Combined endovascular aneurysm repair and on-pump beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting in a one-stage operation is a promising strategy to improve therapeutic efficiency in octogenarians. More studies are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of one-stage and two-stage operations to treat concomitant coronary artery disease and aortovascular pathology in the high-risk octogenarian patients.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury is a complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We describe a large multi-center experience of COVID-19 patients with myocardial injury, examining the prognostic role left ventricular function plays on short-term outcomes. METHODS/MATERIALS: We included adult COVID-19 patients admitted to our health system with evidence of myocardial injury and who underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) during index admission. Patients were dichotomized into those with reduced ejection fraction (EF

Highlights • Acute coronary occlusions without ST elevation criteria suffer double mortality without reperfusion. • ECG findings other than ST elevation criteria can identify occlusion myocardial infarction sooner and more accurately. • Our results justify further research to evaluate the external validity of advanced ECG interpretation., Objective In the STEMI paradigm of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), many NSTEMI patients have unrecognized acute coronary occlusion MI (OMI), may not receive emergent reperfusion, and have higher mortality than NSTEMI patients without occlusion. We have proposed a new OMI vs. Non-Occlusion MI (NOMI) paradigm shift. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of OMI ECG findings vs. formal STEMI criteria for the diagnosis of OMI. We hypothesized that blinded interpretation for predefined OMI ECG findings would be more accurate than STEMI criteria for the diagnosis of OMI. Methods We performed a retrospective case-control study of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. The primary definition of OMI was either 1) acute TIMI 0–2 flow culprit or 2) TIMI 3 flow culprit with peak troponin T ≥1.0 ng/mL or I ≥10.0 ng/mL. Results 808 patients were included, of whom 49% had AMI (33% OMI; 16% NOMI). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of STEMI criteria vs Interpreter 1 using OMI ECG findings among 808 patients were 41% vs 86%, 94% vs 91%, and 77% vs 89%, and for Interpreter 2 among 250 patients were 36% vs 80%, 91% vs 92%, and 76% vs 89%. STEMI(−) OMI patients had similar infarct size and mortality as STEMI(+) OMI patients, but greater delays to angiography. Conclusions Blinded interpretation using predefined OMI ECG findings was superior to STEMI criteria for the ECG diagnosis of Occlusion MI. These data support further investigation into the OMI vs. NOMI paradigm and suggest that STEMI(−) OMI patients could be identified rapidly and noninvasively for emergent reperfusion using more accurate ECG interpretation.

COVID-19 triggers a hypercoagulable state with a high incidence of thrombotic complications. We have noted a higher than expected incidence of stent thrombosis in these patients., Graphical abstract

Objective: To assess the role of Copeptin in diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in troponin-blind period. Subjects and methods: This study was conducted on 40 patients who presented to emergency department complaining of chest pain and were highly suspicious to have acute cardiac ischemia, in addition to 10 subjects serving as a healthy control group. Blood samples were collected for determination of CK-MB, cTnI and Copeptin. These were measured twice (in patients’ group); at 3 h and then at 6–9 h from admission time. Results: The first sample revealed a non-significant difference between UA group and AMI group as regards CKMB and troponin, however, high significant difference was found as regards Copeptin (Z = 5.29, P

Objectives: High sensitivity cardiac troponin T and I (hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI) assays show analytical, diagnostic and prognostic improvement over contemporary sensitive cTn assays. However, given the importance of troponin in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction, implementing this test requires rigorous analytical and clinical verification across the total testing pathway. This was the aim of this study. Design and methods: Analytical verification included assessment of critical outlier frequency, for hs-cTnI and cTnI assays. Concordance for paired cTnI and hs-cTnI measurements (n=1096) was verified using 99th percentiles for both genders (cTnI: 30 ng/L, hs-cTnI: 25 ng/L) and for men and women separately (hs-cTnI: M: 34;F: 16 ng/L). Discordant data was correlated with clinical and laboratory information. Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) or Non-ACS was adjudicated by two cardiologists independently. Results: The hs-cTnI assay showed a lower (10-fold) critical outlier rate (0.091%) and more detectable results above the limit of detection (LOD) (23.4%) and 99th percentile (2.4%), compared to cTnI. Analytical concordance between the two assays was high (94.5%) but decreased (91.7%) when gender-specific hs-cTnI cut-offs were used. The hs-cTnI assay gave fewer false negatives (up to 1.0%) but disproportionately more false positives (up to 6.7%) overall, which improved (3.9%) for serial measurements. Conclusions: Laboratories should analytically and clinically verify hs-cTn assays before use, with attention to performance and the clinical and diagnostic algorithms that support appropriate testing and result interpretation. Work in the pre- and post-analytical phases is necessary to augment the analytical improvement in the new era of troponin testing. Keywords: Troponin, High sensitivity, Acute Coronary Syndrome