Search

The COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked havoc and created challenges in various subspecialty training programs, including hematology/oncology fellowship programs. The challenge of social distancing, providing care for those infected by COVID-19, continuing appropriate treatment of time-sensitive diseases, and the looming threat of health care worker infections required swift planning and restructuring of training programs. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education provided leeway to tackle the challenges faced by institutions and training programs in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently, there is no established guideline specific to hematology and oncology fellowship programs. While understanding that there is no one-size-fits-all, shared experiences can assist training programs to incorporate best practices and customize their programs to provide an active educational environment that balances patient care needs, didactics, scholarly activities, and wellbeing during the process of rapid changes and adaptation. We share our hematology/oncology fellowship program’s restructuring approach in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology. Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis can involve any organ, but isolated spleen involvement is rare. Diagnosis can be challenging as other etiologies may have similar presentations. A 58-year-old African American female presented with life threatening epistaxis, anemia, refractory thrombocytopenia, and massive splenomegaly. Lymphoproliferative, infectious, and autoimmune etiologies were eliminated with laboratory testing and bone marrow biopsy. The patient had multiple splenic artery aneurysms precluding an open diagnostic splenectomy. Partial splenic artery embolization was performed, which normalized the platelet count and resolved the spontaneous bleeding. This allowed diagnostic splenectomy and splenic artery repair to be safely performed. Surgical pathology demonstrated extensive non-caseating granulomas consistent with sarcoidosis. We present this case to demonstrate the omnipotent nature of sarcoidosis and a complex multi-disciplinary approach for successful diagnosis and treatment., Highlights • Sarcoidosis rarely presents with extrapulmonary involvement leading to life-threatening clinical scenarios. • Splenic sarcoidosis as a source of life-threatening platelet sequestration. • Splenectomy can be used as diagnostic and therapeutic intervention in sarcoidosis. • Partial splenic artery embolization provides safe alternative to open splenic artery aneurysm repair.

Hematologic changes in pregnancy are common and can potentially lead to maternal and fetal morbidity. Here, we present various hematologic manifestations seen in pregnant women. Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) is the most common cause of anemia in pregnancy. Physiologically, the state of pregnancy results in increased iron demand. Iron deficiency is important to diagnose and treat early for better maternal and fetal outcomes. An algorithmic approach is used for the repletion of iron storage, starting with oral elemental iron daily and escalating to intravenous iron if necessary. Folate and cobalamin are necessary elements for deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis, fetal growth, and maternal tissue development, and deficiency in these elements can be a cause for anemia in pregnancy. Thrombocytopenia is currently the second most common hematologic condition in pregnancy after anemia. There is a wide range of etiology for thrombocytopenia in pregnancy from benign to life-threatening causes that require prompt diagnosis and treatment. These conditions include gestational thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, pregnancy-associated atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome, and immune thrombocytopenia. Acquired bleeding disorders that can cause major complications in pregnancy include von Willebrand disease (vWD) and coagulation factor deficiencies. Women with vWD are at increased risk of pregnancy bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage. Pregnancy can also produce a physiologic hypercoagulable state, leading to life-threatening conditions like thromboembolism. Diagnosis, treatment options, and guidelines for the management of these conditions will be explored in this review.

We report the case of a 40-year-old man with no significant past medical history who had been hospitalized multiple times over the course of one year with recurring cough, dyspnea, pruritic rash, and variable degrees of eosinophilia. He was variably diagnosed with asthma and pneumonia. After his last hospitalization with severe symptoms, the patient was referred for pulmonary evaluation where hypereosinophilia (HE) led to a hematologic workup. Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed the FIP1L1-PDGFRA gene fusion and bone marrow analysis confirmed a diagnosis of chronic eosinophilic leukemia. The patient was treated with daily imatinib and prednisone and he was symptom-free at a four-week follow-up examination.

We report two cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in patients who developed pulmonary embolism and transient anti-phospholipid antibodies. At the time of presentation with acute pulmonary embolism, both patients had leukocytosis and increased levels of anti-cardiolipin antibodies, which resolved at testing 12 weeks after initial presentation. Studying cases of pulmonary embolism and increased anti-phospholipid antibodies in the context of COVID-19 could be one of the factors for elucidating the possible connection between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, anti-phospholipid antibodies, and thrombosis.

e19234 Background: More sophisticated treatment techniques in cancer management have led to increased complexity in patient care. The perception of cancer outcomes is different between physicians and may result in premature hospice referral in hospitalized patients with or without cancer-related acute illness. We created a clinical scenario-based survey to assess perceptions of goals of care choices of inpatient primary providers while caring for patients with malignancies. Methods: A survey was developed and sent to all internal medicine and primary care residency programs nationwide via “Survey Monkey” online platform. Cases were adapted from real patient encounters. A total of 8 cases were presented and physicians were asked to determine level of care. Two cases represented potentially curable disease, three described patients with treatable but incurable malignancies, and the remainder described patients with advanced malignancies appropriate for hospice care. Physicians were also questioned about patterns of consulting hematology/oncology (HO) and their opinions regarding barriers in providing care to patients with malignancies. Results: Of 269 physicians who took the survey, 184 physicians (68%) fully completed it. 37% reported consulting HO for every patient with underlying malignancy, while 2% of the providers do not have access to HO consultants. In curable cancers, 65% of physicians would request inpatient oncology consultation while 11% would initiate hospice referral. There was a significant variation in choices for care in treatable cancer cases. In case 1, 13% of surveyed physicians thought that patients were hospice appropriate, while a higher percentage felt the same for the 2nd and 3rd cases with 18% and 52%, respectively. For hospice-appropriate patients, 25% of providers felt that further cancer treatment should be performed in younger patients, while the majority agreed on hospice referral (91%) for older patients. The most reported barrier to providing care to hospitalized patients with malignancies was a disconnect between the perception of goals of care of the primary treating oncologist/hematologist and patient’s actual condition. Conclusions: Perceptions about goals of care in hospitalized patients with malignancies varies and is affected by patient age and perceived severity of disease, which doesn’t necessarily translate into outcome statistics reported in literature. A multidisciplinary approach and treating oncologist involvement might be warranted when patient goals of care change is planned in hospital setting.

Background Since early 2000, intensive policing, wide scale street drug testing, and actions aimed at limiting the availability of specific drugs have been implemented in Georgia. Supporters of this approach argue that fear of drug testing and resulting punishment compels drug users to stop using and prevents youth from initiating drug use. It has been also stated that reduction in the availability of specific drugs should be seen as an indication of the overall success of counter-drug efforts. The aim of the current review is to describe the drug-related law enforcement response in Georgia and its impact on illicit drug consumption and drug-related harm. Method We reviewed relevant literature that included peer-reviewed scientific articles, stand-alone research reports, annual drug situation reports, technical reports and program data. This was also supplemented by the review of relevant legislation and judicial practices for the twelve year period between 2002 and 2014. Results Every episode of reduced availability of any “traditional” injection drug was followed by the discovery/introduction of a new injection preparation. The pattern of drug consumption was normally driven by users’ attempts to substitute their drug of choice through mixing together available alternative substances. Chaotic poly-substance use and extensive utilization of home-made injection drugs, prepared from toxic precursors, became common. Massive random street drug testing had little or no effect on the prevalence of problem drug use. Conclusions Intensive harassment of drug users and exclusive focus on reducing the availability of specific drugs did not result in reduction of the prevalence of injecting drug use. Repressive response of Georgian anti-drug authorities relied heavily on consumer sanctions, which led to shifts in drug users’ behavior. In most cases, these shifts were associated with the introduction and use of new toxic preparations and subsequent harm to the physical and mental health of drug consumers.