Search

Non-surgical periodontal therapy (NSPT) underpins all other restorative treatment which takes place in the mouth. Therefore a thorough understanding of the process of delivery of effective NSPT and long-term maintenance of periodontal health is essential for every dental practitioner. This article covers the steps involved and discusses the benefits and challenges which may be encountered. CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article highlights the benefits and challenges of non-surgical management of periodontal disease and the key role that the patient plays in achieving and maintaining periodontal health.

BACKGROUND The dental complications of uncontrolled diabetes include reduced salivary flow rate, candidiasis and periodontal manifestations. A recent meta-analysis concluded that diabetes patients have a significantly higher severity, but not extent, of destructive periodontal disease than non-diabetics. The authors reported that most type-1 diabetes studies using dental radiographic data have not controlled for confounding factors such as smoking. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to compare radiographic alveolar bone loss between type 1 diabetes (T1DM) and non-diabetes (NDM) participants in a Scottish non-smoking population. METHODS Digital bitewing radiographs for 174 Scottish adults never or ex-smoker (>5 years) participants (108 T1DM, 66 NDS), recruited from outpatient clinics throughout Greater Glasgow and Clyde, were included in the analysis. A single blinded, trained, and calibrated examiner recorded the radiographic bone loss seen on bitewing radiographs using the digital screen caliper (Screen Calliper ICONICO version 4.0 (Copyright (C) 2001-6 Iconico), New York). The bone loss was measured as the distance between the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) and the deepest radiographic alveolar bone margin interproximally of each tooth. RESULTS T1DM participants had more radiographic alveolar bone loss throughout the all teeth measured (median:1.27 mm versus 1.06 mm, P < 0.001) and more than a two-fold increase in the risk of having sites with ≥2 mm periodontal destruction (OR = 2.297, 95%CI 1.058 to 4.986, P = 0.036) compared with non-diabetes subjects. CONCLUSIONS Patients suffering from type 1 diabetes are at higher risk of periodontitis even when controlling for multiple possible confounding factors and this difference can be detected on routine dental radiographs at an early stage. These data confirm radiographically the previously reported association between T1DM and periodontal bone loss.

The objective of this case report is to illustrate the diagnosis and classification of periodontitis according to the 2017 Classification system as recommended in the British Society of Periodontology (BSP) implementation plan.A 37-year-old female was diagnosed with periodontitis (Molar-Incisor-Pattern), stage III grade C - currently unstable. Several issues pertinent to the diagnosis of localised forms of periodontitis in young patients are discussed in relation to the current and previous classification systems.Periodontitis can be limited to a few sites and this case highlights the importance of a careful application of the Basic Periodontal Examination (BPE).

Case report A case of a 59-year-old female patient who attended with a history of periodontitis, who had been successfully treated and maintained for several years, is described. Following a full periodontal assessment, the patient was diagnosed with 'generalised periodontitis; stage IV; grade C; currently stable'.Conclusion The present case report exemplifies the use of the 2017 classification system in a successfully treated and well-maintained patient whose treatment need is supportive periodontal treatment. It recognises the fact that, by staging and grading, the patient is a high-risk periodontitis patient due to historical disease experience, but also that following successful therapy and maintenance she is currently 'stable' with no need for active periodontal therapy.

This case report is the fourth in a series that illustrates the application of the BSP implementation plan for diagnosing periodontitis patients according to the 2017 classification. It demonstrates the diagnostic approach and disease classification for a previously treated patient who presented with a diagnosis of unstable generalised periodontitis; stage IV, grade C. We describe a case of a 49-year-old patient who attended with a history of periodontal treatment over several years. Following a full periodontal assessment, the patient was diagnosed with 'generalised periodontitis; stage IV, grade C; currently unstable'. This case report presents an example of how to classify and diagnose a patient using the 2017 classification system and highlights challenges with the application of the new classification in patients with a previous history of periodontal therapy.

There have been numerous reports in the scientific literature investigating the possible association between alcohol-containing mouthwashes and oral cancer but relatively few epidemiological surveys have taken place and the findings have been equivocal. This article will address the controversial issue of the safety of mouthwashes and provide an objective assessment of the latest scientific evidence. CPD/Clinical Relevance: The evidence surrounding the safety of ‘over the counter’ alcohol-containing mouthwashes is evaluated. This provides guidance for dentists and dental care professionals of when it is appropriate to recommend mouthwash use to their patients.

Introduction: The objective of this case report is to illustrate the diagnosis and classification of periodontitis according to the 2017 Classification system as recommended in the British Society of Periodontology (BSP) implementation plan.Case report: We describe two cases in the form of a pair of siblings, who developed periodontitis very early in life. A 19-year-old female was diagnosed with “Generalised periodontitis; Stage III/Grade C; currently unstable”. Her 14year-old sister was diagnosed with “Localised periodontitis; Stage II, Grade C; currently unstable”.Conclusion: The present case report presents an example for the application of the new classification system and illustrates the importance of a periodontal check for children and adolescents and/or their relatives

Introduction: The objective of this case report is to illustrate the diagnosis and classification of periodontitis according to the 2017 Classification system as recommended in the British Society of Periodontology (BSP) implementation plan.Case report: We describe a case of a patient who was diagnosed with “Localised periodontitis; Stage II, Grade B; currently unstable”.Conclusion: The present case report presents an example for the application of the new classification system and illustrates how the new classification system captures disease severity, extent and disease susceptibility by staging and grading periodontitis

This article will focus on the antiplaque efficacy of mouthwashes. An antiplaque agent inhibits the formation of plaque and also reduces gingivitis. There is good evidence that chlorhexidine digluconate, used in the correct concentrations, is the gold standard agent against which all others should be measured. It does, however, have some unwanted side-effects. One of the major problems for antiplaque mouthwashes is that they have a much reduced effect on established plaque within the oral environment. Although they can flow into the biofilm channels and kill bacteria in the superficial layers of dental plaque, they cannot penetrate the biomass and inhibit the pathogenic bacteria adjacent to the tooth surface and gingival margin. There is no evidence that they prevent the progression of periodontitis. Clinical relevance: The evidence supporting the use of ‘over the counter’ antiplaque mouthwashes is evaluated. This provides guidance for dentists and dental care professionals of when it is appropriate to recommend mouthwash use to their patients.