1. Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants
- Author
-
Antonio D'Addona, Giorgio Pompa, Piero Papi, P. De Angelis, S. De Angelis, Paolo Francesco Manicone, Margherita Giorgia Liguori, and Pier Carmine Passarelli
- Subjects
oral surgical procedure ,medicine.medical_specialty ,periodontics ,medicine.medical_treatment ,biocompatible materials ,Connective tissue ,Subepithelial connective tissue graft ,Esthetics, Dental ,Matrix (biology) ,connective tissue ,dental implant ,Settore MED/07 - MICROBIOLOGIA E MICROBIOLOGIA CLINICA ,Settore MED/28 - MALATTIE ODONTOSTOMATOLOGICHE ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Medicine ,Prospective Studies ,Dental implant ,Dental Implants ,business.industry ,Soft tissue ,030206 dentistry ,Buccal administration ,Periodontology ,Surgery ,Clinical trial ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Otorhinolaryngology ,Connective Tissue ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Collagen ,Oral Surgery ,business - Abstract
Dental implant placement is a predictable therapy for replacing teeth. Nevertheless, mechanical, biological, and aesthetic complications frequently occur. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of a xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) used at the time of implant placement as an alternative to a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG), for soft tissue augmentation. This was a prospective clinical trial with 12 months of follow-up. In the control group, soft tissue augmentation at the time of implant placement was performed with a SCTG, while in the test group, a XCM was employed. At 12 months postoperative, all xenografts showed no postoperative complications. In both groups, a significantly greater thickness was observed on the buccal and occlusal sides from preoperative to 3 months postoperative (P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF