Search

Humans possess a numerical intuition that allows them to manipulate large non-symbolic quantities. This ability has been broadly assessed with the help of number comparison tasks involving simultaneously displayed arrays. Many authors pointed out that the manipulation (or the lack thereof) of non-numerical features deeply impacts performance in these tasks, but the specific nature of this influence is not clear. The current study investigates the interaction between numerical and non-numerical quantity judgment tasks. Adult participants performed five distinct comparison tasks, each based on a target dimension: numerosity, total area, dot size, convex hull, and mean occupancy. We manipulated the relation between the target and the other dimensions to measure their respective influence on task performance. Results showed that total area and convex hull substantially affected numerosity comparisons. The number of dots conversely acted as an informative dimension when participants had to make a decision based on the total area or the convex hull. Our results illustrate that adults flexibly use non-target dimensions as visual cues to perform comparison judgments. Overall, this suggests that the influence found in numerical comparison tasks is explicit and deliberate rather than due to implicit visual integration processes., info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Study Objectives Sleep–wake complaints and difficulties in making new learning are among the most persistent and challenging long-term sequelea following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Yet, it is unclear whether, and to what extent, sleep characteristics during the chronic stage of TBI contribute to sleep–wake and cognitive complaints. We aimed to characterize sleep architecture in chronic moderate to severe TBI adults and assess whether non-rapid eye movement slow wave activity (SWA) is associated to next day performance in episodic memory tasks according to TBI severity. Methods Forty-two moderate to severe TBI participants, 12–47 months post-injury, and 38 healthy controls were tested with one night of in-laboratory polysomnography, followed the next morning by questionnaires (sleep quality, fatigue, and sleepiness) and neuropsychological assessment. We used multiple regression analyses to assess the moderator effect of SWA power on TBI severity and next-day memory performance. Results We found that TBI participants reported worse sleep quality and fatigue, and had worse cognitive performance than controls. No between group differences were found on macro- and micro-architecture of sleep. However, SWA significantly interacted with TBI severity to explain next-day memory performance: higher SWA was more strongly associated to better memory performance in more severe TBI compared to milder TBI. Conclusions This study provides evidence that the injured brain is able to produce macro- and micro-architecture of sleep comparable to what is seen in healthy controls. However, with increasing TBI severity, lower non-rapid eye movement SWA power is associated with reduced ability to learn and memorise new information the following day.