1. Randomized Controlled Trial of Personalized Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment vs Education to Promote Screening Uptake
- Author
-
Edgar Asiimwe, FeiFei Qin, Vandana Sundaram, Timothy Yen, Tina Storage, and Uri Ladabaum
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Colorectal cancer ,Risk management tools ,Intention ,Risk Assessment ,Article ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Patient Education as Topic ,Randomized controlled trial ,Risk Factors ,law ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Aged ,Framingham Risk Score ,Hepatology ,business.industry ,Hazard ratio ,Gastroenterology ,Odds ratio ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,United States ,Confidence interval ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Patient Participation ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,business ,Risk assessment ,Health Belief Model - Abstract
INTRODUCTION Risk stratification has been proposed as a strategy to improve participation in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but evidence is lacking. We performed a randomized controlled trial of risk stratification using the National Cancer Institute's Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (CCRAT) on screening intent and completion. METHODS A total of 230 primary care patients eligible for first-time CRC screening were randomized to risk assessment via CCRAT or education control. Follow-up of screening intent and completion was performed by record review and phone at 6 and 12 months. We analyzed change in intent after intervention, time to screening, overall screening completion rates, and screening completion by CCRAT risk score tertile. RESULTS Of the patients, 61.7% of patients were aged
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF