Search

Asthma is one of the most common underlying diseases in women of reproductive age that can lead to potentially serious medical problems during pregnancy and lactation. A group of key stakeholders across multiple relevant disciplines was invited to take part in an effort to prioritize, strategize, and mobilize action steps to fill important gaps in knowledge regarding asthma medication safety in pregnancy and lactation. The stakeholders identified substantial gaps in the literature on the safety of asthma medications used during pregnancy and lactation and prioritized strategies to fill those gaps. Short-term action steps included linking data from existing complementary study designs (US and international claims data, single drug pregnancy registries, case-control studies, and coordinated systematic data systems). Long-term action steps included creating an asthma disease registry, incorporating the disease registry into electronic health record systems, and coordinating care across disciplines. The stakeholders also prioritized establishing new infrastructures/collaborations to perform research in pregnant and lactating women and to include patient perspectives throughout the process. To address the evidence gaps, and aid in populating product labels with data that inform clinical decision making, the consortium developed a plan to systematically obtain necessary data in the most efficient and timely manner.

Before the widespread adoption of vaccination, adenovirus type 4 and type 7 were long associated with respiratory illnesses among military recruits. When supplies were depleted and vaccination was suspended in 1999 for approximately a decade, respiratory illnesses due to adenovirus infections resurged. In March 2011, a new live, oral adenovirus vaccine was licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration and was first universally administered to military recruits in October 2011, leading to rapid, dramatic elimination of the disease within a few months. As part of licensure, a postmarketing study (Sentinel Surveillance Plan) was performed to detect potential safety signals within 42days after immunization of military recruits. This study retrospectively evaluated possible adverse events related to vaccination using data from the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Branch Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS) database. Among 100,000 recruits who received the adenovirus vaccine, no statistically significant greater risk of prespecified medical events was observed within 42days after vaccination when compared with a historical cohort of 100,000 unvaccinated recruits. In an initial statistical analysis of International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes, a statistically significant higher risk for 19 other (not prespecified) medical events occurring in 5 or more recruits was observed among vaccinated compared with unvaccinated groups. After case record data abstraction for attribution and validation, two events (psoriasis [21 vs 7 cases] and serum reactions [12 vs 4 cases]) occurred more frequently in the vaccinated cohort. A causal relation of these rare events with adenovirus vaccination could not be established given confounding factors in the DMSS, such as coadministration of other vaccines and incomplete or inaccurate medical information, for some recruits. Prospective surveillance assessing these uncommon, but potentially relevant, immune-related symptoms may be beneficial in defining potential causal association with adenovirus vaccination.

Objective To assess the risk for ventricular septal defects and congenital heart defects following zidovudine exposure during pregnancy using data from the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry. Study design Data on 16,304 prospectively reported pregnancies were analyzed to estimate the frequency and risk of ventricular septal defects and congenital heart defects, comparing exposure between zidovudine-containing regimens and non-zidovudine antiretroviral regimens. The numerator includes defect cases in outcomes at ≥20 weeks of gestational age. The denominator includes live birth outcomes. Infants with chromosomal anomalies were excluded. Results There were 15,451 live birth outcomes; 13,073 were prenatally exposed to zidovudine-containing regimens and 2378 to non-zidovudine containing regimens. There were 36 ventricular septal defect cases: 31 exposed to prenatal zidovudine and 5 unexposed. Nine of the zidovudine-exposed cases had earliest exposure in the first trimester; 22 had second/third trimester exposure. Of the 5 ventricular septal defect cases not exposed to zidovudine, 2 had earliest exposure to non-zidovudine antiretroviral regimens in the first trimester, and 3 had exposure in the second/third trimester. The prevalence of ventricular septal defect was 0.24% (95% confidence interval: 0.16, 0.34) for infants exposed to zidovudine-containing regimens and 0.21% (95% confidence interval: 0.07, 0.49) for non-zidovudine regimens. The relative risk comparing the 2 was 1.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.44, 2.90). There were a total of 90 congenital heart defect cases; 78 were exposed prenatally to zidovudine-containing regimens, and 12 were unexposed. Twenty-six of the zidovudine-exposed cases had earliest exposure in the first trimester and 52 had second/third trimester exposure. Six congenital heart defect cases with non-zidovudine antiretroviral regimens had earliest exposure in the first trimester and 6 had exposure in the second/third trimester. The prevalence of congenital heart defects was 0.60% (95% confidence interval: 0.47, 0.74) for infants exposed to zidovudine-containing regimens and 0.50% (95% confidence interval: 0.26, 0.88) for non-zidovudine regimens. The relative risk comparing the 2 was 1.18 (95% confidence interval: 0.64, 2.17). Conclusions The prevalence and risk of ventricular septal defects and congenital heart defects among infants exposed to zidovudine-containing regimens is not significantly different from the prevalence and risk in infants exposed to non-zidovudine containing regimens. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01137981 .

Tuberculosis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in women of childbearing age (15-44 years). Despite increased tuberculosis risk during pregnancy, optimal clinical treatment remains unclear: safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic data for many tuberculosis drugs are lacking, and trials of promising new tuberculosis drugs exclude pregnant women. To advance inclusion of pregnant and postpartum women in tuberculosis drug trials, the US National Institutes of Health convened an international expert panel. Discussions generated consensus statements (>75% agreement among panelists) identifying high-priority research areas during pregnancy, including: (1) preventing progression of latent tuberculosis infection, especially in women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus; (2) evaluating new agents/regimens for treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; and (3) evaluating safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of tuberculosis drugs already in use during pregnancy and postpartum. Incorporating pregnant women into clinical trials would extend evidence-based tuberculosis prevention and treatment standards to this special population.