Search

Background Erosive pustular dermatosis of the scalp (EPDS) is a chronic condition characterized by erosive plaques and subsequent scarring alopecia as a result of local trauma or inflammation. A number of therapeutic approaches have been described in the literature but there is no consensus of opinion on optimal treatment of the disease. Objectives To provide evidence-based recommendations for topical and systemic treatment of adult patients with EPDS by performing a systematic review. Methods The MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 26 June 2019 in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for studies involving adult patients treated for EPDS with at least one reported response to treatment. The study was registered on PROSPERO. Texts were reviewed independently by two authors. The risk of bias and quality of the studies were assessed using the Quality Appraisal Checklist for Case Series Studies. Results In total 75 studies were included, involving 168 patients. Many treatments have been reported in the literature, with varying degrees of therapeutic success. The results were highly heterogeneous and methodological quality was very low. We were unable to perform a meta-analysis on the data. Conclusions The limited available evidence supports use of topical corticosteroids, with or without oral zinc, followed by maintenance therapy with topical calcineurin inhibitors as being effective in managing this condition. Topical photodynamic therapy is also potentially beneficial in the management of EPDS. Prospective, comparative, randomized controlled trials are required in order to provide further evidence to guide treatment.

A comprehensive evaluation of the risk of serious infections in biologic therapies for psoriasis is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies reporting serious infections in people taking any licensed biologic therapy for psoriasis compared with those taking placebo, nonbiologic therapy, or other biologic therapies. The quality of the studies was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria. No significant heterogeneity was detected in data from 32 RCTs (n = 13,359 participants) and one cohort study (n = 4,993 participants). In adults, low- to very-low-quality RCT data showed no significant difference between any biologic therapy and placebo at weeks 12–16 (overall pooled Peto odds ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval = 0.36–1.41) and weeks 20–30 (odds ratio = 2.27, 95% confidence interval = 0.45–11.49). No significant differences were found in any of the other comparisons in underpowered RCT data. Prospective cohort study data of low quality suggests that only adalimumab (adjusted hazard ratio [adjHR] = 2.52, 95% confidence interval = 1.47–4.32) was associated with a significantly higher risk of serious infection compared with retinoid and/or phototherapy in adults. No association between biologic therapies and serious infections in patients with psoriasis who were eligible for RCTs was detected. Further observational studies are needed to inform the uncertainty around this risk in the real world.