1. Effects of the herbal medicine Rikkunshito, for functional dyspepsia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
- Author
-
Seok-Jae Ko, Minji Kim, Jae-Woo Park, Ji-seon Park, and Jinsung Kim
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Functional dyspepsia ,Combination therapy ,Meta Analysis and Systematic Reviews ,Cochrane Library ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Rating scale ,law ,Recurrence ,Internal medicine ,Medicine ,Humans ,Dyspepsia ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Hepatology ,Gastric emptying ,business.industry ,Western medicine ,Gastroenterology ,Indigestion ,Confidence interval ,Treatment Outcome ,Gastric Emptying ,Rikkunshito ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Meta-analysis ,Meta‐analysis ,Systematic review ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Meta Analysis and Systematic Review ,Drug Therapy, Combination ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Regular Articles ,Drugs, Chinese Herbal ,Phytotherapy - Abstract
Background and Aim Functional dyspepsia (FD) is characterized by chronic and unexplained indigestion at upper abdomen. Because of unsatisfactory effect of conventional treatments, demand is growing for complementary and alternative medicine. Rikkunshito (RKT) is a herbal medicine, which has been widely used for FD in Asia; however, the evidence is lacking. We carried out systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the effect and safety of RKT in the treatment of FD. Methods Electronic databases were searched in April 2019, including PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. All eligible studies should be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RKT or combination therapy (RKT and western medicine) group to western medicine group. The primary outcome measure was the total clinical efficacy rate (TCE). The secondary outcomes were total dyspepsia symptom scale, gastric emptying rate, gastrin, motilin, recurrence 6 months after treatment, and Hamilton depression rating scale. Results Fifty‐two RCTs with 5475 patients were involved in this systematic review and meta‐analysis. Compared with western medicine, RKT showed significant better result, with higher TCE (relative risk = 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 1.25, P
- Published
- 2020