1. Evaluation of long-term breast shape in inferior versus superomedial pedicle reduction mammoplasty: a comparative study
- Author
-
William Watfa, Gianluca Sapino, David Guillier, Julien Baudoin, Pietro G. di Summa, Jérôme Martineau, and Daniel Haselbach
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Mammoplasty ,030230 surgery ,Breast shape ,Reduction Mammoplasty ,Inferior pedicle ,Surgery ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Ptosis ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Medicine ,Original Article ,Breast reduction ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Breast reconstruction ,Vas score - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Among breast reduction mammoplasty, the inferior pedicle-based (IFP) technique is considered the most performed by plastic surgeons. A growing interest for the supero-medial based pedicle (SMP) mammoplasty technique has been documented in literature and clinical practice. However, no real evidence exists on the superiority of one technique over another. METHODS: This study represents a retrospective multimodal analysis, using a prospectively maintained database, comparing wise pattern breast reduction techniques (IFP vs. SMP) over a 24-month follow-up. From January 2015 to July 2017, all patients undergoing wise pattern bilateral reduction mammoplasty, using either an IFP or a SMP technique, were included in the study and divided in two groups. Pre-operative breast measurements included sternal notch-to-nipple distance (SN-N), infra-mammary fold to inferior border of Nipple Areolar Complex (NAC) distance length and ptosis. The same measurements were recorded at 2 weeks, 6 months and 24 months post-op. Complications were recorded and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients were included in the study, among which 36 (62%) were treated with a SMP technique and 22 (38%) with an IFP technique. At the 24-month follow-up timepoint, the SN-N distance was significantly shorter (*P
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF