Search

AimsWhile patients with psychological distress have poorer short-term outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), their longer-term function is unknown. We aimed to 1) assess the influence of preoperative mental health status on long-term functional outcomes, quality of life, and patient satisfaction; and 2) analyze the change in mental health after TKA, in a cohort of patients with no history of mental health disorder, with a minimum of ten years’ follow-up.MethodsProspectively collected data of 122 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA in 2006 were reviewed. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively at two and ten years using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS) and Function Score (KSFS); Oxford Knee Score (OKS); and the Mental (MCS) and Physical Component Summary (PCS) which were derived from the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Patients were stratified into those with psychological distress (MCS < 50, n = 51) and those without (MCS ≥ 50, n = 71). Multiple regression was used to control for age, sex, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and baseline scores. The rate of expectation fulfilment and satisfaction was compared between patients with low and high MCS.ResultsThere was no difference in the mean KSKS, KSFS, OKS, and SF-36 PCS at two years or ten years after TKA. Equal proportions of patients in each group attained the minimal clinically important difference for each score. Psychologically distressed patients had a comparable rate of satisfaction (91.8% (47/51) vs 97.1% (69/71); p = 0.193) and fulfilment of expectations (89.8% vs 97.1%; p = 0.094). The proportion of distressed patients declined from 41.8% preoperatively to 29.8% at final follow-up (p = 0.021), and their mean SF-36 MCS improved by 10.4 points (p < 0.001).ConclusionPatients with poor mental health undergoing TKA may experience long-term improvements in function and quality of life that are comparable to those experienced by their non-distressed counterparts. These patients also achieved a similar rate of satisfaction and expectation fulfilment. Undergoing TKA was associated with improvements in mental health in distressed patients, although this effect may be due to residual confounding. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(7):845–851.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-specific templates promises to be able to increase alignment while decreasing operative time, increasing patient throughput, decreasing instrumentation, reducing risk of fat embolism and intraoperative bleeding, decreasing tissue loss, shortening recovery, reducing post-operative pain and decreasing incidence of infection. However, multiple studies have shown conflicting results regarding these potential benefits. This study serves to critically evaluate the potential advantages and disadvantages of using a patient-specific templating technique through a single-surgeon study. METHODS: All patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for osteoarthritis of the knee using TruMatch® Personal Solutions total knee replacement by a single surgeon were identified. An age-, gender-, side-, diagnosis- and surgeon-matched cohort who underwent conventional primary TKAs was randomly identified for comparison. RESULTS: The average distal medial femur (p

Background The number of young patients with degenerative lumbar spondylosis is expected to increase, and with it, the number of younger patients seeking surgical treatment is likely to rise. The goals of young patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis may differ from those of older patients, but little is known about the levels of pain and function, complication rates, or radiographic union that young patients achieve after interbody fusion. Questions/purposes (1) How likely were patients younger than 50 years to achieve a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in improvement on any of several validated patient-reported outcomes scores after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis at a minimum of 2 years after surgery? (2) What proportion developed complications or underwent reoperations? (3) What proportion achieved radiographic fusion or developed adjacent-segment degeneration? Methods Longitudinally maintained institutional registry data of patients undergoing primary, single-level, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis at a single institution from 2006 to 2013 were studied in this retrospective case series. Of the 96 patients who met inclusion criteria, 14% (13 of 96) were missing follow-up data, leaving 83 patients younger than 50 years with complete clinical and radiological data at a minimum of 2 years (97%, 93 of 96 had sufficient data to assess complications and radiographic fusion). The mean age of the cohort was 44 ± 7 years. Radiological parameters for each patient with spondylolisthesis were recorded. Clinical outcomes such as the numeric rating scale for back pain and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and SF-36 were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6 months and 2 years. The proportion of patients who had an improvement greater than the MCID of each outcome instrument was then calculated. The occurrence of any medical, surgical or wound complications, and reoperations for any reason were recorded. Radiographic fusion using Bridwell grading and adjacent-segment degeneration were assessed by an independent observer not involved in clinical care. The mean follow-up was 5 ± 3 years. Results The proportions of patients younger than 50 years who achieved the MCID for the various patient-reported outcomes were 82% (68 of 83) for leg pain, 75% (62 of 83) for back pain, 87% (72 of 83) for ODI and 71% (59 of 83) for SF-36 physical component summary at 2 years. Two perioperative complications occurred, and two reoperations were performed for implant-related complications. A total of 85% (79 of 93) of young patients achieved stable fusion, 8% (seven of 93) had radiologic adjacent-segment degeneration, and one patient underwent a revision procedure. Conclusions Young patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis commonly, but do not always, experience clinically meaningful gains in pain relief, function, and quality of life after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. A low risk of complications, reoperations, nonunion and adjacent-segment degeneration were also noted in this population. Level of evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Background Routine pre-operative group cross-match (GXM) and post-operative haemoglobin level measurements are performed for all total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients in many institutions. We aimed to determine whether this practice is justified, and to identify predictors for post-operative transfusion. Materials and methods A retrospective review was performed on 226 TKA procedures performed between Jan. 2011 and Dec. 2013. Patients' demographics and clinical details including co-morbidities, pre-operative laboratory results, type of anaesthesia, surgery duration, post-operative haemoglobin level and transfusion requirement were reviewed. Results Overall transfusion rate was 10.6% (n = 24). Cross-match to transfusion ratio was 6.5. The cross-match to transfusion ratio (C:T ratio) was measured as the ratio of number of units of blood cross-matched to units of blood transfused. In females, relative risk of transfusion between patients with pre-operative haemoglobin below 12.0 and those above or equal to 12.0 was significant at 4.53 (Confidence interval (CI) 2.16 to 9.53). The relative risk of transfusion between patients above 65 years of age compared to those below 65 years of age was 1.13 (CI 1.03 to 1.23). Multivariate analysis revealed advancing age (p = 0.044) and lower preoperative haemoglobin (p Conclusion Post-operative transfusion rates are low and excessive pre-operative GXM and post-operative haemoglobin checks are contributing to unnecessary medical costs. Predictors of blood transfusion risk in unilateral TKA in our cohort of Asian population were advancing age and lower pre-operative haemoglobin level. Type and screen tests should be performed for all other patients. Level of Scientific Evidence: 3.