Search

Ranolazine is approved for patients with chronic stable angina but has not been formally studied in patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP). Patients with RAP have limited therapeutic options and significant limitations in their quality of life. The Ranolazine Refractory Angina Registry was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and effectiveness of ranolazine in RAP patients in order to expand treatment options for this challenging patient population. Using an extensive prospective database, we enrolled 158 consecutive patients evaluated in a dedicated RAP clinic. Angina class, medications, major adverse cardiac events including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization were obtained at 12, 24, and 36 months. At 3 years, 95 (60%) patients remained on ranolazine. A ≥2 class improvement in angina was seen in 48% (38 of 80 patients with known Canadian Cardiovascular Society class) of those who remained on ranolazine. Discontinuation due to side effects, ineffectiveness, cost, and progression of disease were the principle reasons for discontinuation, but primarily occurred within the first year. In conclusion, ranolazine is an effective antianginal therapy at 3-year follow-up in patients with RAP and may reduce cardiac readmission.

Chemotherapy treatment of malignancy accounts for 1–2% of takotsubo syndrome (TS) triggers. Women comprise 60–70% of patients with chemotherapy-associated TS, a distinctly lower prevalence than the 90% female prevalence in TS overall. Fluorouracil is the most commonly reported TS-triggering chemotherapeutic agent, although this must be interpreted in the context of the frequency of worldwide use of this agent. The onset of TS relative to chemotherapy initiation is quite variable, ranging from the initial administration to subsequent chemotherapy cycles several weeks beyond initiation. Limited information suggests chemotherapy can be safely reinitiated once the patient has recovered from the initial TS event. Having a TS event in the setting of chemotherapy treatment for malignancy is associated with substantial mortality.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction (MI) in younger women, often treated conservatively due to revascularization risks. Revascularization outcomes are largely unknown in SCAD presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).The purpose of this study was to compare revascularization strategies and outcomes of STEMI-SCAD with STEMI atherosclerosis (STEMI-ATH).Consecutive STEMI patients were retrospectively analyzed (2003 to 2017) at 2 regional STEMI programs (Minneapolis Heart Institute and Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute) with 3-year outcomes.Among 5,208 STEMI patients, SCAD was present in 53 (1%; 93% female). SCAD prevalence was 19% in female STEMI patients age ≤50 years. Compared with STEMI-ATH, STEMI-SCAD patients were younger (age 49 ± 10 years vs. 63 ± 13 years), were more often female (93% vs. 27%), and had more frequent cardiogenic shock (19% vs. 9%); all p ≤ 0.03. In STEMI-SCAD, the culprit artery was more commonly left main (13% vs. 1%) or left anterior descending (47% vs. 38%); both p = 0.003. Acute revascularization was lower in STEMI-SCAD (70% vs. 97%); p 0.001. In STEMI-SCAD, acute revascularization included percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), n = 33 (62%), or bypass grafting, n = 4 (8%); PCI success was 91%. Those with revascularization were more likely to have shock, left main culprit, proximal dissection, and initial TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) flow grade 0 to 1. The 3-year survival was 98% for STEMI-SCAD versus 84% for STEMI-ATH; p 0.001.STEMI-SCAD represents an important STEMI subset, particularly among younger women, characterized by significantly greater frequency of left main or left anterior descending culprit and cardiogenic shock than STEMI-ATH. Primary PCI is successful in most STEMI-SCAD patients, with low 3-year mortality.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD). Variability of practice and of comprehensive diagnostic risk across institutions is not known. METHODS: Four centers prospectively enrolled consecutive pediatric CHD patients

As the mortality of coronary artery disease improves and the population ages, an increasing number of patients with refractory angina are not candidates for percutaneous or surgical revascularization. We evaluated the impact of a dedicated refractory angina clinic on quality of life. In 76 patients who completed the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and Seattle Angina Questionnaire at baseline and 1 year, the Medical Outcomes Study results showed the proportion of patients who rated their health as “good” or “excellent” more than doubled from baseline to 1 year (15.8% vs. 42.2%; P < .001). Similarly, the Seattle Angina Questionnaire score was significantly improved at 1 year compared to baseline (P = .025), as were angina stability (P = 0.017) and angina frequency (P = .010). In conclusion, treatment in a dedicated clinic is associated with improved quality of life in patients with refractory angina.

Although rare in the general population, genetic arrhythmia syndromes have a significant public health impact due to their contribution to the incidence of sudden cardiac death, particularly in children and young adults. When sudden cardiac death occurs in the absence of ischemic heart disease, a genetic cardiac condition may be suspected and clinical and genetic screening of family members is recommended. The Genetic Arrhythmia Center at the Minneapolis Heart Institute collaborates with local partners in the Sudden Cardiac Arrest network to connect patients and their family members with interdisciplinary care for diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. The most common conditions seen in the Genetic Arrhythmia Center include arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, long QT syndrome, and Brugada syndrome. In addition to providing clinical care and genetic testing and counseling services, the Genetic Arrhythmia Center is working to advance the scientific understanding of the clinical presentation and natural history of these rare conditions.