Search

Background: Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections can have serious consequences during the period of aplasia and lymphopenia following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Large pediatric cohort studies examining the effect of antiviral prophylaxis against these viruses are scarce. The present study aimed to analyse the potential effect of antiviral prophylaxis (acyclovir and famciclovir) on active post-transplant EBV and CMV infection in a pediatric cohort of allogeneic HSCT recipients. Methods: We used data from the TREASuRE cohort, consisting of 156 patients who had a first allogeneic HSCT, enrolled in four pediatric centers in Canada between July 2013 and March 2017. Follow-up was performed from the time of transplant up to 100 days post-transplant. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between antiviral prophylaxis with acyclovir and/or famciclovir and EBV and CMV DNAemia was estimated using multivariate Cox regression models. Results: The post-transplant cumulative incidence of EBV and CMV DNAemia at 100 days of follow-up were, respectively, 34.5% (95% CI: 27.6–42.6) and 19.9% (95% CI: 14.5–27.1). For acyclovir, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for CMV and EBV DNAemia was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.24–1.26) and 1.41 (95% CI: 0.63–3.14), respectively. For famciclovir, the adjusted HR were 0.82 (95% CI: 0.30–2.29) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.36–1.72) for CMV and EBV DNAemia, respectively. Conclusion: The antivirals famciclovir and acyclovir did not reduce the risk of post-transplant CMV and EBV DNAemia among HSCT recipients in our pediatric population.

This systematic review was undertaken to identify risk factors associated with post-transplant Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) active infection and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) in pediatric and adult recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). A literature search was conducted in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies published until 30 June 2020. Descriptive information was extracted for each individual study, and data were compiled for individual risk factors, including, when possible, relative risks with 95% confidence intervals and/or p-values. Meta-analyses were planned when possible. The methodological quality and potential for bias of included studies were also evaluated. Of the 3362 titles retrieved, 77 were included (62 for EBV infection and 22 for PTLD). The overall quality of the studies was strong. Several risk factors were explored in these studies, but few statistically significant associations were identified. The use of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was identified as the most important risk factor positively associated with post-transplant active EBV infection and with PTLD. The pooled relative risks obtained using the random-effect model were 5.26 (95% CI: 2.92–9.45) and 4.17 (95% CI: 2.61–6.68) for the association between ATG and post-transplant EBV infection and PTLD, respectively. Other risk factors for EBV and PTLD were found in the included studies, such as graft-versus-host disease, type of conditioning regimen or type of donor, but results are conflicting. In conclusion, the results of this systematic review indicate that ATG increases the risk of EBV infection and PTLD, but the link with all other factors is either nonexistent or much less convincing.

Background Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is carried in the blood of most adults, and transfusion-related infections have been reported. EBV is particularly deleterious in immunosuppressed transplant patients. The aim was to determine if EBV transmission occurred through leukodepleted blood product transfusion in pediatric recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT). Study design and methods This prospective Canadian multi-center cohort study includes 156 allogeneic HSCT pediatric recipients. The association between EBV and transfusion was analyzed using Cox regressions. EBV infection, defined by a PCR+ test in the blood of seronegative recipients of an EBV-negative graft, was monitored in order to correlate the recipient EBV strain with that of the blood donors. EBV genotypes were determined by PCR amplification followed by DNA sequencing at two loci (EBNA3b and LMP1). Results No statistically significant associations were found between transfusions and EBV. One case of post-transplant EBV infection was identified among the 21 EBV-seronegative recipients receiving an EBV-negative graft. A total of 22 blood donors were retraced to determine whether the recipient's EBV strain matched that of a donor. One donor strain showed 100% sequence homology at the EBNA3b locus, but differed by one or two point mutations and by a 132-bp deletion at the LMP1 locus. The blood donor in question was alone among the 22 donors to show amplifiable virus in plasma. Blood from this donor readily produced an immortalized lymphoblastoid cell line in culture. Conclusion While considered a rare event, EBV transmission through transfusion may occur in the context of severe immunosuppression.