Search

Cervical cancer (CC) is second most common cause of cancer in Latin America and is a leading cause of cancer mortality among women. In 2015, an estimated 74,488 women will be diagnosed with CC in Latin America and 31,303 will die of the disease. CC mortality is projected to increase by 45% by 2030 despite human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and screening efforts. In this setting, the goal was of the current study was to examine CC control efforts in Latin America and identify deficiencies in these efforts that could be addressed to reduce CC incidence and mortality. The authors found that HPV vaccination has been introduced in the majority of Latin American countries, and there is now a need to monitor the success (or shortcomings) of these programs and to ensure that these programs are sustainable. This topic was also reviewed in light of emerging data demonstrating that visual inspection with acetic acid and HPV DNA testing without Papanicolaou tests have efficacy from a screening perspective and are good alternatives to cytology-based screening programs. Overall, there is a need to build capacity for CC control in Latin America and the best strategy will depend on the country/region and must be tailored to meet the needs of the population as well as available resources.

6556 Background: Multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) are commonly practiced in high-income countries (HICs) to ensure adherence to guidelines through a team approach to patient care. The Global Cancer Institute (GCI) established online MTBs in 2012 to facilitate live telemedicine discussions of breast and gynecologic case scenarios between specialists in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and expert specialists in HICs. GCI MTBs aim to improve clinical knowledge and patterns of practice for specialists in LMICs through an interactive online forum. Methods: In each monthly MTB, three patient case scenarios are presented by specialists in LMICs for live discussion with an expert panel of specialists based in HICs. Guideline or clinical trial-based discussions are held for each case scenario. Best practices for clinical care in limited resource settings are also discussed. Links to clinical practice guidelines, clinical trials, and resources are provided to all MTB attendees. For educational purposes, each MTB is live streamed and uploaded to a private YouTube channel for viewing by community oncologists and trainees worldwide. Results: The GCI MTBs program has recruited over 500 LMIC participants from 48 hospitals in 24 countries across Latin America, Eastern Europe, Africa, and Asia. 17 expert breast cancer specialists and 13 expert gynecologic cancer specialists provide multidisciplinary guidance. To date, 130 breast cancer case scenarios and 80 gynecologic cancer case scenarios have been presented. For breast MTBs, 73% of case scenarios were invasive ductal carcinomas. Common subtypes presented were ER/PR+ (63%), HER2+ (30%), and triple negative disease (28%). 56 cases involved advanced disease management (43%). For gynecologic MTBs, common gynecologic cancer case scenarios were cervical (74%) and ovarian (15%). 37 cases involved advanced disease management (46%). Conclusions: GCI MTBs are a useful educational tool for specialists in LMICs to improve patterns of clinical practice and engage in multidisciplinary discussions. GCI continues to expand its MTBs to cancer facilities in LMICs.