1. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision versus noncomplete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Jiancong Hu, Xiaochuan Chen, Wenpei Chen, Zerong Cai, Dezheng Lin, Wei Liu, and Zhaoliang Yu
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Ileus ,business.industry ,Retrospective cohort study ,Cochrane Library ,Vascular surgery ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Meta-analysis ,medicine ,Resection margin ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
The benefit of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (LCME) is conflicting in terms of short-term outcomes when compared with laparoscopic non-complete mesocolic excision (LNCME) for right colon cancer. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to elucidate the safety and efficacy of LCME and LNCME. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases for studies addressing the effects of LCME versus LNCME up to February 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies which compared LCME with LNCME were included. Two RCTs and 6 retrospective studies with a total of 1925 patients met our search criteria and were assessed. 922 patients underwent LCME and 1003 patients underwent LNCME. Although LCME was associated with a longer operative time (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 14.26 min; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.56 to 23.96; p = 0.004), patients in this group might benefit from less intraoperative blood loss (WMD: 11.30 ml; 95%CI −19.93 to −2.68; p = 0.01), a greater number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD: 6.82; 95%CI 4.04 to 9.59; p
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF