Search

Background: Identifying and enhancing protective beliefs is essential in reducing suicide risk among military-affiliated individuals. The goal of this study was to examine if specific reasons for living impact the relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions among military-affiliated individuals in primary care settings. Methods: Participants included 2,685 U.S. military personnel and their adult beneficiaries recruited from primary care clinics. Participants completed the Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Screen, Suicide Cognitions Scale, and Brief Reasons for Living Inventory. Results: Responsibility to family and survival and coping beliefs—were related to suicidal cognitions with higher levels associated with less suicidal cognitions and a weaker relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions. By contrast, fear of suicide and fear of social disapproval were associated with more suicidal cognitions, and the link between positive PTSD screen and suicidal cognitions was stronger for individuals with higher levels of fear of social disapproval. Moral objection did not predict suicidal cognitions and did not moderate the relationship between PTSD and suicidal cognitions. Limitations: The limitations of the study include that measures were done in primary care and brief screeners were often used. Additionally, the study is cross-sectional in nature, whereas some of the symptoms and outcome variables likely fluctuate over time. Conclusions: Findings suggest not all reasons for living are not equally influential and, among military-affiliated individuals with a positive PTSD screen, bolstering reasons for living related to responsibility to family and survival and coping skills could be particularly impactful in reducing suicide cognitions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused many Veterans Healthcare Administration providers working with veterans diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder to question the feasibility and appropriateness of continuing to provide trauma-focused treatment during this crisis. The Veterans Healthcare Administration is in a unique position to continue to provide trauma-informed care because of its capacity to offer telemental health services. Data from a Veterans Affairs medical center's posttraumatic stress disorder clinical team suggest that not only are veterans interested in continuing with treatment but also that the treatments can be modified to accommodate the current climate. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective Despite the availability of evidence-based psychotherapy (EBP) for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in the Veterans Health Administration, treatment completion rates are low and not all veterans benefit from these treatments. Understanding factors associated with PTSD EBP completion and symptom improvement is critical to improving completion rates and effectiveness. Method This chart review study used the Andersen Behavioral Model to examine whether predisposing characteristics (nonmodifiable characteristics such as demographics), enabling factors (modifiable logistic variables that can facilitate or impede treatment use), and need factors (clinical characteristics such as symptom severity or comorbidities) predicted treatment completion or symptom improvement following PTSD EBP treatment among 82 Iraq and Afghanistan combat veterans. Logistic regression was used to examine treatment completion, and repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine changes in PTSD and depression symptoms following treatment. Results EBP completers had greater improvement in PTSD symptoms than did EBP dropouts. Need factors (lack of comorbid substance use disorders and having problems with family members/significant others) were related to treatment completion, whereas enabling resources (receiving individual rather than group treatment) were related to symptom improvement. Conclusions This is one the first studies to use a comprehensive model to examine factors relevant to treatment completion and symptom improvement. Results suggest that nonmodifiable predisposing characteristics do not drive treatment completion and symptom improvement, underscoring the potential importance of targeting enabling resources and needs factors for intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Background Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) rarely remits over time, and if left untreated, leads to significant distress, functional impairment, and increased health care costs. Fortunately, effective evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for PTSD, such as Prolonged Exposure (PE), exist. Despite their availability and efficacy, a significant number of individuals with PTSD do not initiate treatment when offered or dropout prematurely. One proposed theory suggests that the emotional-numbing symptoms of PTSD (e.g., blunted affect, apathy) can serve as a barrier to engaging in, and successfully completing, treatment; and the broad human-animal interaction (HAI) literature available suggests that HAI can potentially reduce emotional numbing related to PTSD. Accordingly, this manuscript describes an ongoing, federally funded, randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of RESCUE, an HAI intervention, as a viable adjunctive treatment component for PE. Methods/design The study will include 70 veterans with PTSD treated at a Southeastern Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC). All participants in the trial receive up to 12 sessions of PE. Participants are randomly assigned 1:1 to (1) volunteer at a local animal shelter or (2) volunteer at a community agency of their choice as part of their in-vivo exposure exercises for PE. Outcomes will be examined via standard clinical interviews, self-report questionnaires, and thematic interviews. Discussion It is hypothesized that participants in the HAI condition will report greater decreases in emotional-numbing symptoms and increased treatment compliance and completion rates relative to those in the community volunteer condition. If successful, RESCUE, could be easily incorporated into standard PE and broadly disseminated. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov. ID: NCT03504722. Retrospectively registered on 2 May 2017.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to systematically review variables associated with initiation of trauma-centered cognitive-behavioral therapy (TC-CBT) among individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD).MethodsPubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress (PILOTS), and Scopus were searched in a systematic manner up to 2018, and 26 relevant studies were recovered and analyzed.ResultsThe average weighted initiation rate was 6% in larger hospital systems with a high rate of trauma and 28% in outpatient mental health settings (range 4%-83%). Older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.51-1.61), female gender (OR=1.18, 95% CI=1.08-1.27), black or other racial-ethnic minority group (OR=1.16, 95% CI=1.03-1.28), Veterans Affairs PTSD service connection status (OR=2.30, 95% CI=2.18-2.42), mental health referral (OR=2.28, 95% CI=1.05-3.50), greater staff exposure to TC-CBT (OR=2.30, 95% CI=2.09-2.52), adaptability of TC-CBT to staff workflow (OR=4.66, 95% CI=1.60-7.72), greater PTSD severity (OR=1.46, 95% CI=1.13-1.78), and comorbid depression (OR=1.21, 95% CI=1.14-1.29) increased the likelihood of TC-CBT initiation, whereas delayed treatment reduced the likelihood of TC-CBT initiation (OR=0.93, 95% CI=0.92-0.95). Qualitative studies showed that mental health beliefs (stigma and lack of readiness), provider organizational factors (low availability, privacy issues), and patient lack of time (logistics) were perceived as barriers to initiation by patients and providers.ConclusionsTC-CBT initiation increased among patients who were older and female. Initiation was also higher among providers who had more exposure to TC-CBT in their work environment and when TC-CBT fit into their existing workflow.

Objectives Exposure-based psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are effective for many, but not all patients. It is important to determine for whom these treatments work and to examine predictors of success. Method An 8-week modified prolonged exposure (PE) treatment, including components of behavioral activation and reducing the number of imaginal exposure sessions, was administered to a sample of 231 Veterans (mean age = 45.7 years, standard deviation = 14.89). Growth mixture modeling was used to model PTSD symptom trajectories across the 8-week intervention and a postintervention appointment. Further, baseline demographics, social support, clinician-rated PTSD symptoms, anxiety, and depression were examined as predictors of trajectories. Results Three classes emerged, labeled responders (n = 35), nonresponders (n = 190), and immediate responders (n = 6). The only significant baseline difference between responders and nonresponders was higher anxiety symptoms in the nonresponders. At follow-up time points, there were higher levels of clinician-rated PTSD, anxiety, and depression symptoms and lower social support in the nonresponders compared to the responders. Conclusion Findings suggest that modifying standard PE treatments by reducing imaginal exposure sessions while adding behavioral activation may not be advisable for most Veterans with PTSD.

Both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy are effective treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Better understanding factors that are associated with engaging in these different treatment options may improve treatment utilization and outcomes. This issue is especially important among veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan, given high rates of those seeking PTSD treatment. This study examined potential predictors of the type of treatment (psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, or both) 232 returning veterans (92% male, mean age = 33.38) engaged in within 1 year of seeking treatment at a VA PTSD clinic. Results indicated that 32.3% of returning veterans engaged in pharmacotherapy only, 23.7% engaged in psychotherapy only, and 44.0% engaged in both. Veterans who engaged in pharmacotherapy only or in both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy had higher pretreatment PTSD and depression symptoms than did those who engaged in psychotherapy only. History of pharmacotherapy treatment was associated with engagement in pharmacotherapy only or both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy, as compared with psychotherapy only. Treatment engagement type was not significantly associated with differences in age, gender, race/ethnicity, service branch, alcohol use/misuse, history of psychotherapy, distance from the VA, or PTSD service connection. Implications for enhancing PTSD treatment engagement are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

Prolonged exposure therapy (PE) is effective in reducing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms among individuals with comorbid substance use disorder (SUD) and PTSD. However, concerns that PE will lead to negative outcomes such as dropout and relapse remain a barrier to high-risk individuals, such as those warranting residential SUD care, receiving PE. The goal of this study was to gather information on feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of offering PE in residential SUD treatment. Study therapists conducted PE (3 times/week, up to 15 sessions) with 9 patients admitted to a residential SUD treatment program at a Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital. Participants completed the PTSD Symptom Checklist (PCL-S) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at admission, at discharge from the 4- to 6-week program, and 3-months postdischarge follow-up. Patients who were offered PE tolerated and engaged in PE as indicated by completion of the protocol, high satisfaction scores, and clinically significant decreases in PTSD and depression symptom severity. Symptom reduction at follow-up was significantly greater among patients who received PE than those who did not ( n = 21). This preliminary data provides initial support for further investigation of the efficacy of PE in residential SUD care.