Search

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after liver transplantation is uncommon but, when present, manifests as graft dysfunction. We report the case of a 54-year-old woman who developed portal hypertension with pleural effusion and ascites secondary to sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) due to acute AMR following an ABO-matched liver transplantation for autoimmune cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Initial immunosuppression comprised basiliximab, decreasing prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. After 1 month, she presented with the massive pleural effusion, slight ascites, and normal liver tests. After excluding common causes of pleural effusion, we performed a liver biopsy that showed atypical rejection with the involvement of large centrilobular veins partially occluded by marked endotheliitis and lax fibrosis suggestive of SOS. Direct immunofluorescence study of C4d showed diffuse endothelial sinusoidal staining, and de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies were detected in his blood. Thus, we diagnosed AMR focused on centrilobular veins and initiated treatment with defibrotide, steroid pulses, and diuretics. However, this was ineffective, and the pleural effusion only resolved when plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin were started. This case shows that AMR can cause SOS with portal hypertension and present with a pleural effusion, and as such, it should be suspected after excluding other more common causes of effusion.

Liver retransplantation (LRT) is a controversial indication. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of LRT at our institution, and to analyze its indications and short- and long-term results.We conducted a retrospective study of a prospectively collected database, including 1645 LT from 1984 to 2018. Results have been analyzed depending on type of LRT (early vs late), study period and indications.We performed 150 LRT in 140 patients. The LRT rate was 9%. Of these, 45 LRT were early (30%), and the other 70% were late LRT. The main indications were: ischemic cholangitis (27%), arterial thrombosis (19%), primary non-function (15%), and HCV recurrence (15%). Mean surgery duration (395 vs. 270 min; P = .001), cold ischemia time (435 vs. 390 min; P = .005) and transfused units required (8 vs. 5 RBC; P = .034) were higher in cases of late LRT. Postoperative mortality (10 vs. 20%; P = .01) was better in cases of late LRT. One- and 5-year actuarial survival rates were 71% and 58%, respectively, which were significantly better during the last decade (80% and 64%). Five-year actuarial survival for ischemic cholangitis is better than other indications, such as recurrence of HCV (78 vs. 51%; P = .02).Liver retransplantation is complex and associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, indications and long-term results have improved during recent years. Therefore, LRT is justified.

Resumen Introduccion El adenocarcinoma de duodeno es una neoplasia poco frecuente, sobre la que existen pocas experiencias publicadas de los resultados tras su reseccion. El objetivo es analizar los resultados obtenidos en nuestro centro tras la reseccion curativa del adenocarcinoma duodenal (AD). Metodos Estudio retrospectivo de los pacientes intervenidos con reseccion curativa por AD entre 1990 y 2017 en nuestro hospital. Resultados Se intervino a 27 pacientes. En 23 casos (85%) se realizo duodenopancreatectomia cefalica (DPC) y en 4 casos (15%) con localizacion en la 3.a-4.a porcion duodenal se realizo duodenectomia (DD) segmentaria. La morbilidad postoperatoria global fue del 67% (18 pacientes). La mortalidad postoperatoria global fue 7% (2 pacientes), sin embargo, la mortalidad postoperatoria relacionada con la cirugia fue de 4% (un paciente). El estudio anatomopatologico evidencio reseccion con margenes libres en todos los casos intervenidos. La mediana de adenopatias resecadas fue 18 (0 a 38), siendo 1 (0 a 8) las adenopatias afectadas. Tras una mediana de seguimiento de 23 (9-69,7) meses, la supervivencia actuarial fue de 62,2 (25,2 a 99,1) meses y la supervivencia actuarial libre de enfermedad fue de 49 (0 a 133) meses. Conclusiones La reseccion quirurgica del AD comporta una elevada morbilidad postoperatoria, sin embargo, consigue una supervivencia prolongada. Dependiendo de la localizacion y en ausencia de infiltracion pancreatica, la DD segmentaria con margenes libres es una alternativa a la DPC.

International audience; Transplant and patient survival are the validated endpoints to assess the success of liver transplantation (LT). This study evaluates arterial and biliary complication-free survival (ABCFS) as a new metric. ABC, considered as an event, was an arterial or biliary complication of Dindo-Clavien grade ≥III complication dated at the interventional, endoscopic, or surgical treatment required to correct it. ABCFS was defined as the time from the date of LT to the dates of first ABC, death, relisting, or last follow-up (transplant survival is time from LT to repeat LT or death). Following primary whole LT (n = 532), 106 ABCs occurred and 99 (93%) occurred during the first year after LT. An ABC occurring during the first year after LT (overall rate 19%) was an independent factor associated with transplant survival (hazard ratio [HR], 3.17; P < 0.001) and patient survival (HR, 2.7; P = 0.002) in univariate and multivariate analyses. This result was confirmed after extension of the cohort to splitliver graft, donation after circulatory death, or re-LT (n = 658). Data from 2 external cohorts of primary whole LTs (n = 249 and 229, respectively) confirmed that the first-year ABC was an independent prognostic factor for transplant survival but not for patient survival. ABCFS was correlated with transplant and patient survival (ρ = 0.85 [95% CI, 0.78-0.90] and 0.81 [95% CI, 0.71-0.88], respectively). Preoperative factors known to influence 5-year transplant survival influenced ABCFS after 1 year of follow-up. The 1-year ABCFS was indicative of 5-year transplant survival. ABCFS is a reproducible metric to evaluate the results of LT after 1 year of follow-up and could serve as a new endpoint in clinical trials.

Background There are no clearly defined indications for pancreas-preserving duodenectomy. The present study aimed to analyze postoperative morbidity and the outcomes of patients undergoing pancreas-preserving duodenectomy. Methods Patients undergoing pancreas-preserving duodenectomy from April 2008 to May 2020 were included. We divided the series according to indication: scenario 1, primary duodenal tumors; scenario 2, tumors of another origin with duodenal involvement; and scenario 3, emergency duodenectomy. Results We included 35 patients. Total duodenectomy was performed in 1 patient of adenomatous duodenal polyposis, limited duodenectomy in 7, and third + fourth duodenal portion resection in 27. The indications for scenario 1 were gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 13), adenocarcinoma (n = 4), neuroendocrine tumor (n = 3), duodenal adenoma (n = 1), and adenomatous duodenal polyposis (n = 1); scenario 2: retroperitoneal desmoid tumor (n = 2), recurrence of liposarcoma (n = 2), retroperitoneal paraganglioma (n = 1), neuroendocrine tumor in pancreatic uncinate process (n = 1), and duodenal infiltration due to metastatic adenopathies of a germinal tumor with digestive hemorrhage (n = 1); and scenario 3: aortoenteric fistula (n = 3), duodenal trauma (n = 1), erosive duodenitis (n = 1), and biliopancreatic limb ischemia (n = 1). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIb) developed in 14% (5/35), and postoperative mortality was 3% (1/35). Conclusions Pancreas-preserving duodenectomy is useful in the management of primary duodenal tumors, and is a technical option for some tumors with duodenal infiltration or in emergency interventions.

Introduction Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a rare malignancy. Given the rarity of the disease, there is limited data related to resection results. The objective is to analyze results at our hospital after the curative resection of duodenal adenocarcinoma (DA). Material and methods The variables were retrospectively collected from patients operated on between 1990 and 2017 at our hospital. Results A total of 27 patients were treated. Twenty-three patients (85%) underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, and 4 patients (15%) with tumors located in the third and fourth portions of the duodenum underwent segmental duodenal resection. The overall postoperative morbidity was 63% (17 patients). Postoperative mortality was 7% (2 patients); however, postoperative mortality related to surgery was 4% (1 patient). All patients had negative resection margins. A median of 18 lymph nodes (range, 0–38) were retrieved and evaluated, with a median of 1 involved node (range, 0–8). Median follow up was 23 (9–69.7) months. Actuarial overall survival was 62.2 (25.2–99.1) months. Actuarial disease-free survival was 49 (0–133) months. Conclusions The surgical treatment of duodenal adenocarcinoma is associated with a high morbidity, although it achieves considerable survival. Depending on the tumor location and if there is no pancreatic infiltration, segmental duodenal resection with negative margins is an alternative to cephalic pancreaticoduodenectomy.