1. Unconscious versus conscious thought in creative science problem finding: Unconscious thought showed no advantage!
- Author
-
Ran Ding, Peiqian Wu, Ruifen Li, Qin Han, Ying Cui, Tingni Li, Public Administration, and Department of Psychology, Education and Child Studies
- Subjects
Male ,Unconscious mind ,Adolescent ,Consciousness ,Science ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,050105 experimental psychology ,Creativity ,Thinking ,03 medical and health sciences ,Fluency ,Creative problem-solving ,0302 clinical medicine ,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous) ,Originality ,Problem finding ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Humans ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,media_common ,Unconscious thought theory ,05 social sciences ,Flexibility (personality) ,Female ,Psychology ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Cognitive psychology - Abstract
Unconscious thought theory (UTT) suggests that creativity benefits more from unconscious thought than conscious thought. However, previous studies have only focused on creative problem solving. This study aims to explore the effect of unconscious thought and conscious thought in creative science problem finding (CSPF). The ability of CSPF was measured by fluency, flexibility and originality. Participants accomplished the CSPF task after 3 min of distraction, during which unconscious thought was supposed to take place, or after 3 min of conscious thought. Results showed that unconscious thought had no advantage over conscious thought on CSPF. For the CSPF task with open instructions, conscious thought was comparable to unconscious thought in fluency, flexibility and originality. What’s more, for the CSPF task with closed instructions, unconscious thought was even overtaken by conscious thought in fluency, flexibility and originality. These findings extend the unconscious thought theory and provide practical guidance on how to propose a creative science problem.
- Published
- 2019