1. The Microbiome of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author
-
Patrick R. Schmidlin, Daniel B. Wiedemeier, Fabienne Gilli, Thomas Attin, Lamprini Karygianni, Philipp Sahrmann, University of Zurich, and Sahrmann, Philipp
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Microbiological culture ,610 Medicine & health ,Review ,Microbiology ,2726 Microbiology (medical) ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Virology ,10066 Clinic of Conservative and Preventive Dentistry ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Microbiome ,culture-dependent techniques ,lcsh:QH301-705.5 ,hybridization ,Periodontitis ,biology ,business.industry ,2404 Microbiology ,Prevotella intermedia ,Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans ,030206 dentistry ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,oral pathogens ,PCR ,pyrosequencing ,lcsh:Biology (General) ,Meta-analysis ,Immunology ,2406 Virology ,Pyrosequencing ,business ,Actinomyces - Abstract
This review aimed to systematically compare microbial profiles of peri-implantitis to those of periodontitis and healthy implants. Therefore, an electronic search in five databases was conducted. For inclusion, studies assessing the microbiome of peri-implantitis in otherwise healthy patients were considered. Literature was assessed for consistent evidence of exclusive or predominant peri-implantitis microbiota. Of 158 potentially eligible articles, data of 64 studies on 3730 samples from peri-implant sites were included in this study. Different assessment methods were described in the studies, namely bacterial culture, PCR-based assessment, hybridization techniques, pyrosequencing, and transcriptomic analyses. After analysis of 13 selected culture-dependent studies, no microbial species were found to be specific for peri-implantitis. After assessment of 28 studies using PCR-based methods and a meta-analysis on 19 studies, a higher prevalence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Prevotella intermedia (log-odds ratio 4.04 and 2.28, respectively) was detected in peri-implantitis biofilms compared with healthy implants. Actinomyces spp., Porphyromonas spp. and Rothia spp. were found in all five pyrosequencing studies in healthy-, periodontitis-, and peri-implantitis samples. In conclusion, the body of evidence does not show a consistent specific profile. Future studies should focus on the assessment of sites with different diagnosis for the same patient, and investigate the complex host-biofilm interaction.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF