Search

Background: Automated 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification without time‐consuming manual segmentation might improve workflow. Purpose: Compare automated valve segmentation (AS) to manual (MS), and manually corrected automated segmentation (AMS), in corrected atrioventricular septum defect (c‐AVSD) patients and healthy volunteers, for assessing net forward volume (NFV) and regurgitation fraction (RF). Study Type: Retrospective. Population: 27 c‐AVSD patients (median, 23 years; interquartile range, 16–31 years) and 24 healthy volunteers (25 years; 12.5–36.5 years). Field strength/Sequence: Whole‐heart 4D flow MRI and cine steady‐state free precession at 3T. Assessment: After automatic valve tracking, valve annuli were segmented on time‐resolved reformatted trans‐valvular velocity images by AS, MS, and AMS. NFV was calculated for all valves, and RF for right and left atrioventricular valves (RAVV and LAVV). NFV variation (standard deviation divided by mean NFV) and NFV differences (NFV difference of a valve vs. mean NFV of other valves) expressed internal NFV consistency. Statistical Tests: Comparisons between methods were assessed by Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests, and intra/interobserver variability by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, with multiple testing correction. Results: AMS mean analysis time was significantly shorter compared with MS (5.3 ± 1.6 minutes vs. 9.1 ± 2.5 minutes). MS NFV variation (6.0%) was significantly smaller compared with AMS (6.3%), and AS (8.2%). Median NFV difference of RAVV, LAVV, PV, and AoV between segmentation methods ranged from −0.7–1.0 mL, −0.5–2.8 mL, −1.1–3.6 mL, and − 3.1–‐2.1 mL, respectively. Median RAVV and LAVV RF, between 7.1%–7.5% and 3.8%–4.3%, respectively, were not significantly different between methods. Intraobserver/interobserver agreement for AMS and MS was strong‐to‐excellent for NFV and RF (ICC ≥0.88). Data Conclusion: MS demonstrates strongest internal consistency, followed closely by AMS, and AS. Automated segmentation, with or without manual correction, can be considered for 4D flow MRI valvular flow quantification. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To assess errors associated with EPI‐accelerated intracardiac 4D flow MRI (4DEPI) with EPI factor 5, compared with non‐EPI gradient echo (4DGRE). Methods: Three 3T MRI experiments were performed comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE: steady flow through straight tubes, pulsatile flow in a left‐ventricle phantom, and intracardiac flow in 10 healthy volunteers. For each experiment, 4DEPI was repeated with readout and blip phase‐encoding gradient in different orientations, parallel or perpendicular to the flow direction. In vitro flow rates were compared with timed volumetric collection. In the left‐ventricle phantom and in vivo, voxel‐based speed and spatio‐temporal median speed were compared between sequences, as well as mitral and aortic transvalvular net forward volume. Results: In steady‐flow phantoms, the flow rate error was largest (12%) for high velocity (>2 m/s) with 4DEPI readout gradient parallel to the flow. Voxel‐based speed and median speed in the left‐ventricle phantom were ≤5.5% different between sequences. In vivo, mean net forward volume inconsistency was largest (6.4 ± 8.5%) for 4DEPI with nonblip phase‐encoding gradient parallel to the main flow. The difference in median speed for 4DEPI versus 4DGRE was largest (9%) when the 4DEPI readout gradient was parallel to the flow. Conclusions: Velocity and flow rate are inaccurate for 4DEPI with EPI factor 5 when flow is parallel to the readout or blip phase‐encoding gradient. However, mean differences in flow rate, voxel‐based speed, and spatio‐temporal median speed were acceptable (≤10%) when comparing 4DEPI to 4DGRE for intracardiac flow in healthy volunteers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) have an altered aortic geometry after an arterial switch operation (ASO), with neo-aortic root dilatation as an important complication. Geometry-related aortic hemodynamics have been assumed to contribute to pathology of the ascending aorta (AAo).Purpose: To evaluate aortic flow displacement (FD) and regional wall shear stress (WSS) in relation to ascending neo-aortic geometry in children after ASO.Study Type: Prospective.Population: Twenty-eight TGA patients after ASO and 10 healthy volunteers.Field Strength/sequence: 3.0T/4D flow (segmented fast-spoiled echo pulse), noncontrast-enhanced MR angiography (Dixon), and anatomic images (SSFP).Assessment: Aortic diameters and body surface area-indexed aortic dimensions (Z-scores), normalized FD and planar ascending aortic WSS.Statistical Tests: Mann-Whitney and chi-square tests for differences in FD magnitude, WSS, and FD directionality between groups, respectively. Spearman rank correlation to assess the degree of association between aortic geometry, FD and WSS parameters. Shapiro-Wilk test to evaluate distribution normality on the absolute differences in octant location between FD and WSS.Results: TGA patients showed a significantly dilated proximal AAo and relatively small mid-AAo dimensions at the level of the pulmonary arteries (Z-scores neo-aortic root: 4.38 ± 1.96 vs. 1.52 ± 0.70, P < 0.001; sinotubular junction: 3.48 ± 2.67 vs. 1.38 ± 1.30, P = 0.010; mid-AAo: 0.32 ± 3.06 vs. 1.69 ± 1.24, P = 0.001). FD magnitude was higher in TGA patients (neo-aortic root: 0.048 ± 0.027 vs. 0.021 ± 0.006, P < 0.001; sinotubular junction: 0.054 ± 0.037 vs. 0.029 ± 0.013, P < 0.05) and was related to the neo-aortic Z-score. Clear areas of higher WSS at the right and anterior aortic wall regions along the distal AAo were detected in TGA patients, most pronounced in those with relatively smaller mid-AAo diameters.Data Conclusion: TGA-specific geometry related to the ASO, evidenced by neo-aortic root dilatation and a sudden change in vessel diameter at mid-AAo level, leads to more aortic flow asymmetry in the proximal AAo and WSS distribution with higher WSS at the right and anterior aortic wall regions along the distal AAo.Level Of Evidence: 1 Technical Efficacy Stage: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1105-1116. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Aorta hemodynamics have been associated with aortic remodeling, but the reproducibility of its assessment has been evaluated marginally in patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). The current study evaluated intra- and interobserver reproducibility of 4D flow MRI-derived hemodynamic parameters (normalized flow displacement, flow jet angle, wall shear stress (WSS) magnitude, axial WSS, circumferential WSS, WSS angle, vorticity, helicity, and local normalized helicity (LNH)) in TAA patients; (2) Methods: The thoracic aorta of 20 patients was semi-automatically segmented on 4D flow MRI data in 5 systolic phases by 3 different observers. Each time-dependent segmentation was manually improved and partitioned into six anatomical segments. The hemodynamic parameters were quantified per phase and segment. The coefficient of variation (COV) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated; (3) Results: A total of 2400 lumen segments were analyzed. The mean aneurysm diameter was 50.8 ± 2.7 mm. The intra- and interobserver analysis demonstrated a good reproducibility (COV = 16–30% and ICC = 0.84–0.94) for normalized flow displacement and jet angle, a very good-to-excellent reproducibility (COV = 3–26% and ICC = 0.87–1.00) for all WSS components, helicity and LNH, and an excellent reproducibility (COV = 3–10% and ICC = 0.96–1.00) for vorticity; (4) Conclusion: 4D flow MRI-derived hemodynamic parameters are reproducible within the thoracic aorta in TAA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hemodynamic aorta parameters can be derived from 4D flow MRI, but this requires lumen segmentation. In both commercially available and research 4D flow MRI software tools, lumen segmentation is mostly (semi‐)automatically performed and subsequently manually improved by an observer. Since the segmentation variability, together with 4D flow MRI data and image processing algorithms, will contribute to the reproducibility of patient‐specific flow properties, the observer's lumen segmentation reproducibility and repeatability needs to be assessed. Purpose: To determine the interexamination, interobserver reproducibility, and intraobserver repeatability of aortic lumen segmentation on 4D flow MRI. Study Type: Prospective and retrospective. Population: A healthy volunteer cohort of 10 subjects who underwent 4D flow MRI twice. Also, a clinical cohort of six subjects who underwent 4D flow MRI once. Field Strength/Sequence: 3T; time‐resolved three‐directional and 3D velocity‐encoded sequence (4D flow MRI). Assessment: The thoracic aorta was segmented on the 4D flow MRI in five systolic phases. By positioning six planes perpendicular to a segmentation's centerline, the aorta was divided into five segments. The volume, surface area, centerline length, maximal diameter, and curvature radius were determined for each segment. Statistical Tests: To assess the reproducibility, the coefficient of variation (COV), Pearson correlation coefficient (r), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. Results: The interexamination and interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver repeatability were comparable for each parameter. For both cohorts there was very good reproducibility and repeatability for volume, surface area, and centerline length (COV = 10–32%, r = 0.54–0.95 and ICC = 0.65–0.99), excellent reproducibility and repeatability for maximal diameter (COV = 3–11%, r = 0.94–0.99, ICC = 0.94–0.99), and good reproducibility and repeatability for curvature radius (COV = 25–62%, r = 0.73–0.95, ICC = 0.84–0.97). Data Conclusion: This study demonstrated no major reproducibility and repeatability limitations for 4D flow MRI aortic lumen segmentation. Level of Evidence: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims To non-invasively assess intraventricular viscous energy loss (EL) and proportionality to kinetic energy (KE) in Fontan patients using 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare to healthy controls. Methods and results Thirty Fontan patients and 15 controls underwent 4D flow MRI. Ventricular EL was computed and normalized by end-diastolic volume (EDV). EL over the cardiac cycle (ELcycle) relative to the average kinetic energy (KEcycle) was quantified using a dimensionless index, ELindex (ELcycle/KEcycle). EL was significantly elevated in Fontan patients compared to controls (ELcycle/EDV: 3.7 vs. 2.6 J/m3, P  =   0.001). Fontan patients with inflow of blood entering a ventricle, which leaves that ventricle through a ventricular septal defect to the aorta, defined as discordant inflow-to-outflow showed significantly higher EL compared to patients with inflow of blood into the same ventricle from which the blood is ejected into the aorta, defined as concordant inflow-to-outflow (ELcycle/EDV: 6.8 vs. 3.2 J/m3, P  =   0.001). EL was not significantly different in Fontan patients with a systemic left vs. a systemic right ventricle (ELcycle/EDV: 3.5 vs. 3.6 J/m3, P  =   0.91). ELindex was significantly elevated in Fontan patients compared to controls (ELindex: 0.4 vs. 0.2, P  <   0.001). Highest ELindex was found in Fontan patients with discordant inflow-to-outflow compared to concordant inflow-to-outflow (0.5 vs. 0.3, P  =   0.01). Conclusion Fontan patients show disproportionate intraventricular EL relative to KE. Intraventricular EL is elevated in these patients compared to healthy controls, and highest EL is found in patients with discordant inflow-to-outflow. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the current study was to assess the scan-rescan reproducibility of left ventricular (LV) kinetic energy (KE), viscous energy loss (EL) and vorticity during diastole from four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI) in healthy subjects. Twelve volunteers (age 27 ± 3 years) underwent whole-heart 4D flow MRI twice in one session. In-scan consistency was evaluated by correlation between KE and EL. ELindex was computed to measure the amount of EL relative to KE over diastole. Scan-rescan analysis was performed to test reproducibility of volumetric measurements of KE, EL, ELindex and vorticity in the LV over early (E) and late (A) diastolic filling. In-scan consistency between KE and EL was strong-excellent (E-filling scan1: r = 0.92, P < 0.001; scan2: ρ = 0.96, P < 0.001 and A-filling scan1: ρ = 0.87, P < 0.001; scan2: r = 0.99, P < 0.001). For the majority of subjects (10 out of 12), KE and EL measures showed good to strong reproducibility. However, with a wide range of agreement [intraclass correlation (ICC): 0.64-0.95] and coefficients of variation (CV) ≤ 25%. ELindex showed strong reproducibility for all 12 subjects with a strong ICC (0.94, P < 0.001) and a CV of 9%. Scan-rescan reproducibility of volumetric vorticity showed good-excellent ICCs (0.83-0.95) with CVs ≤ 11%. In conclusion, the current study shows strong-excellent in-scan consistency and overall good agreement between scans for 4D flow MRI assessment of left ventricular kinetic energy, energy loss and vorticity over diastole. However, substantial differences between the scans were also found in some parameters in two out of twelve subjects. Strong reproducibility was found in the dimensionless ELindex, which measures the amount of viscous energy loss relative to the average kinetic energy over diastole. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]