Search

BACKGROUND The inclusion of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of operable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer is becoming a new standard. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression on tumor cells has emerged as the most important biomarker for sensitivity to ICIs targeting the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)-PD-L1 axis. Little is known about the impact of neoadjuvant treatment on PD-L1 expression. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry (Ventana SP263 assay) on tumor cells in treatment-naive diagnostic tumor samples and matched lung resections from patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer included in the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials 16/96, 16/00, 16/01, and 16/14. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) with cisplatin/docetaxel, either as single modality (CT), with sequential radiotherapy [chemoradiation therapy (CRT)] or with the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab (CT + ICI). RESULTS Overall, 132 paired tumor samples were analyzed from patients with neoadjuvant CT (n = 69), CRT (n = 33) and CT + ICI (n = 30). For CT and CRT, PD-L1 expression before and after neoadjuvant treatment did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon test, P = 0.94). Likewise, no statistically significant difference was observed between CT and CRT for PD-L1 expression after neoadjuvant treatment (P = 0.97). For CT + ICI, PD-L1 expression before and after neoadjuvant treatment also did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon test, P > 0.99). Event-free survival and overall survival for patients with downregulation or upregulation of PD-L1 expression after neoadjuvant treatment were similar. CONCLUSIONS In our cohort of patients neoadjuvant treatment did not influence PD-L1 expression, irrespective of the specific neoadjuvant treatment protocol. Dynamic change of PD-L1 expression did not correlate with event-free survival or overall survival.

BACKGROUND Chemoradiotherapy with durvalumab consolidation has yielded excellent results in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Therefore, it is essential to identify patients who might benefit from a surgical approach. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 437 patients with operable stage III NSCLC enrolled in four consecutive Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) trials (16/96, 16/00, 16/01, 16/08) were pooled and outcomes were analyzed in 431 eligible patients. All patients were treated with three cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin/docetaxel), followed in some patients by neoadjuvant radiotherapy (44 Gy, 22 fractions) (16/00, 16/01, 16/08) and cetuximab (16/08). RESULTS With a median follow-up time of 9.3 years (range 8.5-10.3 years), 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 37% and 25%, respectively. Overall, 342 patients (79%) underwent tumor resection, with a complete resection (R0) rate of 80%. Patients (n = 272, 63%) with R0 had significantly longer OS compared to patients who had surgery but incomplete resection (64.8 versus 19.2 months, P < 0.001). OS for patients who achieved pathological complete remission (pCR) (n = 66, 15%) was significantly better compared to resected patients without pCR (86.5 versus 37.0 months, P = 0.003). For patients with pCR, the 5- and 10-year event-free survival and OS rates were 45.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.8% to 57.7%] and 28.1% (95% CI 15.2% to 42.6%), and 58.2% (95% CI 45.2% to 69.2%) and 45.0% (95% CI 31.5% to 57.6%), respectively. CONCLUSION We report favorable long-term outcomes in patients with operable stage III NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and docetaxel ± neoadjuvant sequential radiotherapy from four prospective SAKK trials. Almost two-third of the patients underwent complete resection after neoadjuvant therapy. We confirm R0 resection and pCR as important predictors of outcome.

Contains fulltext : 225470.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) More effective treatment modalities are urgently needed in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of older age. We hypothesized that adding lenalidomide to intensive standard chemotherapy might improve their outcome. After establishing a safe lenalidomide, dose elderly patients with AML were randomly assigned in this randomized Phase 2 study (n = 222) to receive standard chemotherapy ("3 + 7") with or without lenalidomide at a dose of 20 mg/day 1-21. In the second cycle, patients received cytarabine 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-6 with or without lenalidomide (20 mg/day 1-21). The CR/CRi rates in the two arms were not different (69 vs. 66%). Event-free survival (EFS) at 36 months was 19% for the standard arm versus 21% for the lenalidomide arm and overall survival (OS) 35% vs. 30%, respectively. The frequencies and grade of adverse events were not significantly different between the treatment arms. Cardiovascular toxicities were rare and equally distributed between the arms. The results of the present study show that the addition of lenalidomide to standard remission induction chemotherapy does not improve the therapeutic outcome of older AML patients. This trial is registered as number NTR2294 in The NederlandsTrial Register (www.trialregister.nl).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicenter trial was to prospectively evaluate neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) and radiotherapy, including quality of life as outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had malignant pleural mesothelioma of all histological types, World Health Organization performance status of zero to two and clinical stage T1-T3, N0-2, M0 disease considered completely resectable. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by EPP. Postoperative radiotherapy was considered for all patients. RESULTS: In all, 58 of 61 patients completed three cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Forty-five patients (74%) underwent EPP and in 37 patients (61%) the resection was complete. Postoperative radiotherapy was initiated in 36 patients. The median survival of all patients was 19.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.6-24.5]. For the 45 patients undergoing EPP, the median survival was 23 months (95% CI 16.6-32.9). Psychological distress showed minor variations over time with distress above the cut-off score indicating no morbidity with 82% (N = 36) at baseline and 76% (N = 26) at 3 months after surgery (P = 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: The observed rate of operability is promising. A median survival of 23 months for patients undergoing EPP compares favourably with the survival reported from single center studies of upfront surgery. This approach was not associated with an increase in psychological distress.

INTRODUCTION High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT)/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard for patients with relapsed/refractory lymphomas and multiple myeloma (MM), thereby improving DFS and OS. Relapse after HDCT/ASCT remains the major cause of death in patients with lymphomas or MM after melphalan-based HDCT. Dose-intensified bendamustine by replacing carmustine in the BEAM regimen (BeEAM) or by combining it with melphalan (BenMel) is a promising strategy to lower the relapse rates.Renal toxicity after BeEAM emerges as a major concern. METHODS We investigated renal toxicity in consecutive lymphoma patients treated with BeEAM and in consecutive MM patients treated with the same dose of 400 mg/m2 bendamustine (split into 200 mg/m2 on two consecutive days) together with full-dosed (200 mg/m2) melphalan. Patients with a history of renal impairment before HDCT were included. We assessed renal damage summarized as acute kidney injury (AKI) by measuring renal parameters on a daily basis starting from the first day of HDCT until the last day of hospitalization for HDCT/ASCT. AKI: rise of s-creatinine ≥26.5 μmol/L in 48 hours or increase to more than or equal to twofold compared to baseline s-creatinine within 7 days (Kidney Disease International Global Organization, KDIGO, criteria). Grading of AKI: KDIGO. Treatment-related AKI (rAKI): occurred within 10 days from the last administration of bendamustine; no relation to sepsis. Consequently, we defined as treatment-unrelated AKI (uAKI) all renal damage occurring because of sepsis or later than 10 days since the last administration of bendamustine. Statistical Analysis Subgroup differences: Chi-squared test, Fisher Exact test. IBM SPSS software version 21. RESULTS Patient characteristics and therapy regimen: 122 consecutive patients with lymphomas or MM who underwent high- dose bendamustine regimen before ASCT in 01/2013-06/2016. Factors related to rAKIOccurrence of rAKI: correlated (p60 years, previous AKI, cardiovascular comorbidities and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs. In addition, rAKI correlated (p=0.004) with cardiovascular complications during hospitalization; details of subgroups analysis: Table 2.No differences in the incidence of rAKI MM (n=7/15; 46.7%) and lymphoma patients (n=44/107; 41.1%), p=0.683. Acute kidney Injury related to High Dose Bendamustine is reversible and manageable • Acute kidney injury related to bendamustine (rAKI): in 51 patients (41.8%); completely reversible in n=50/51 (98.0%). • rAKI: mild to moderate in 90% of affected patients; did not increase TRM after ASCT. • 3/51 patients (5.9%) with rAKI required transient renal dialysis to enable recovery from renal damage, whereas approaches such as additional hydration were sufficient in the vast majority (n=48 with rAKI; 94.1% of this subgroup). • The median duration of rAKI was 7 days (range, 1-22). ­ According to Cox ZL et al., Adverse Drug Events during AKI and its recovery, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8:1070-1078. CONCLUSION • Our data suggest that treatment-related acute renal toxicity is common in lymphoma and MM patients receiving dose-intensified bendamustine HDCT before ASCT. • However, renal impairment is reversible and manageable. • Our data identify a subgroup of patients at increased risk for the development of renal damage following bendamustine-based HDCT. • Such patients should be strictly monitored during hospitalization, and a generous hydration strategy before, during and after administration of bendamustine is recommended. • Assessing the pre-transplant renal risk profile may help to identify those patients, which may not be candidates for bendamustine-based HDCT thereby avoiding prolonged hospitalization due to rAKI and eventual transient dialysis treatment. • Our results may contribute to design appropriate selection criteria for dose-intensified bendamustine as part of the conditioning regimens preceding HDCT/ASCT in lymphoma and MM patients.