Search

The modular construction method provides a feasible way to construct pre-designed cyano-bridged {LnIIIMIV/V} systems with more attractive structures and adjustable interactions between 4d/5d and 4f ions. In this work, the pentadentate Schiff-base ligands H2Ln (H2L1: 2,6-diacetylpyridine bis(nicotinoylhydrazone); H2L2: 2,6-diacetylpyridine bis(isonicotinoylhydrazone)) with multiple coordination sites were designed to coordinate with DyIII ions firstly, and then combined with K4M(CN)8·2H2O (M = W, Mo) by a liquid–liquid diffusion method to successfully synthesize two trinuclear structures {Dy[MIV(CN)8]0.5(HL1)(H2O)3}2·8H2O (1: M = W; 2: M = Mo), and two dinuclear structures {[Dy[MIV(CN)8](H3L2)(H2O)3]}·sol (3: M = W, sol = 11.5H2O; 4: M = Mo, sol = 2CH3OH·9.5H2O). Interestingly, deprotonation occurs in ligand H2L1 during the formation of complexes 1 and 2, while deprotonation/protonation processes both occur in ligand H2L2 during the synthesis of complexes 3 and 4. Magnetic analyses reveal that complexes 1–4 are all field-induced single-ion magnets (SIMs). The energy barriers (Ueff/kB) of complexes 1 and 2 are 92.83 K and 101.08 K, respectively, which are nearly three-fold higher than those of complexes 3 (30.19 K) and 4 (32.77 K). Ab initio calculations were performed on these series of {LnIIIMIV} heteronuclear complexes to provide more insights into the magnetic relaxation properties. This work provides another example of improving the SMM behaviors of cyano-bridged {LnIIIMIV} systems by deprotonation/protonation at different sites in the ligands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two novel Co–Dy heterometallic complexes, namely, [Co III2 Dy III2 (HL)L{(py)2CO2}{(py)2C(OCH3)O}(NO3)4CH3OH]·2CH3CN·2.5H2O (1, H3L = 2-((2-hydroxy-benzylidene)amino)propane-1,3-diol, (py)2C(OH)2 = the gem-diol form of di-2-pyridyl ketone (dpk) and (py)2C(OCH3)OH = the hemiacetal form of dpk) and [CoIII{(py)2C(OH)O}2][Co II2 Dy III4 DyIII(HL)4(L)4]·3CH3CN·15H2O (2), have been obtained by employing H3L, dpk and Dy(NO3)3·5H2O reacting with Co(NO3)2·6H2O or anhydrous Co(CH3CO2)2 in the solutions of CH3OH and CH3CN (V/V = 1/20) containing N(Me)4OH·5H2O or triethylamine. Structural analysis indicated that two DyIII and two CoIII in 1 formed a star-like topology, while the metal ions in [Co II2 Dy III4 DyIII(HL)4(L)4]− of 2 formed a cross-shaped topology, in which one DyIII and two CoII formed a linear Co II2 DyIII paramagnetic unit. Interestingly, the paramagnetic Co II2 DyIII units in 2 were isolated not only by four diamagnetic CoIII in the [Co II2 Dy III4 DyIII(HL)4(L)4]−, but also by the diamagnetic [CoIII{(py)2C(OH)O}2]+. More interestingly, the distortion of the square antiprism (SAP-8) coordination geometry of DyIII in 2 can be ascribed to the presence of four long Dy–O bonds and four short Dy–O bonds, which could result from the discrepancies of the polarization of CoII and CoIII. Magnetic studies indicated that 1 exhibit two types of magnetic relaxation behavior, in which the magnetic relaxation of the fast relaxation (FR) phase is mainly governed by QTM, while that of the slow relaxation (SR) phase is mainly governed by Orbach and Raman processes with an effective energy barrier (Ueff) value of 59.4(9) K. To our knowledge, the Ueff value is relatively high among the reported CoIII–DyIII heterometallic complexes. For 2, it only shows slow relaxation behavior with a Ueff of 6.43 K. Ab initio calculations revealed that the SR phase and FR phase are governed by the magnetic relaxation of Dy2 and Dy1, respectively, though the axial symmetry of Dy2 (muffin, Cs) is lower than that of Dy1 (triangular dodecahedron, D2d). However, for 2, the theoretical calculations indicated that the severely compressed SAP-8 geometry of DyIII leads to a relatively low Ueff value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two lanthanide single-molecule magnets (SMMs) [Dy3(μ3-OH)(HL-1)3(H2O)3](NO3)2·3H3O (1, H3L-1 = (E)-3-(((8-hydroxyquinolin-2-yl)methylene)amino)propane-1,2-diol) and [Dy6(μ3-OH)4(H2L-2)4(HL-2)2(L-2)2] (2, H3L-2 = (E)-2-hydroxy-N′-(2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzylidene)benzohydrazide) were synthesized and characterized structurally and magnetically. Complex 1 contains a triangular Dy3 core in which the three Dy3+ ions share a μ3-OH− anion and the deprotonated ligands of (HL-1)2− serve both capping and bridging functions, while 2 displays a centrosymmetric hexanuclear DyIII structure with two similar Dy3 triangular cores ligated by two fully deprotonated (L-2)3− ligands, each of which shares two μ3-OH− anions. All the DyIII ions are eight-coordinated with quasi D2d or C2v symmetry. Magnetic studies reveal that 1 exhibited two-step magnetic relaxation under an applied dc field of 800 Oe, with effective energy barriers of 40.1 and 31.0 K for the slow relaxation (SR) and fast relaxation regimes (FR), respectively. Meanwhile, 2 only showed a tail of slow magnetic relaxation at above 2 K. Ab initio calculations have been carried out to show the nature of their different magnetic properties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Based on a β-diketiminate ligand, an iron(III) tetrahedral high-spin complex, [LFeIII(Cl)2] (1), and an iron(II) high-spin triangular planar complex, [LFeIICl] (2), have been synthesized and structurally characterized. Also, complex 1 can be considered as a precursor to produce 2via a reduction process, with a concomitant change in its magnetic anisotropy. Combined experiments and ab initio calculations support the observation of field-induced single-ion magnet (SIM) behaviour for 2 with an effective spin-reversal energy barrier of Ueff = 40.02 K, as a direct consequence of the large intrinsic magnetic anisotropy (easy axis) arising from out-of-state spin-orbit coupling in the trigonal planar FeII complex. Noteworthy butterfly hysteresis loops were observed from 2 up to 8 K, which represents the first case in Fe(II) complexes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two β-Diketiminate cobalt(II) compounds of formula [LCo(μ-Cl)]2·2C6H14 (1) and [LCoClPy]·0.5C7H8·0.5C6H14 (2) (L = [PhC-(PhCN-Dip)2]−, Dip = 2,6-iPr2C6H3) have been synthesized and structurally characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 1 exhibits a dinuclear structure, whereas 2 is a mononuclear structure having a pyridine ligand. The tetra-coordinate CoII centers in both compounds show distorted tetrahedral geometry configuration. Magnetic measurements reveal that only 2 exhibits field-induced slow relaxation of magnetization with an effective spin-reversal energy barrier of 16.27 K, though large easy-axis magnetic anisotropies for both compounds are unveiled by the analysis of ab initio calculations. Dimeric Co–Co units in 1 indicate intramolecular antiferromagnetic interaction. Compared to individual CoII fragment of 1, the first excited quartet state of 2 is strongly destabilized, leading to a smaller unquenched orbital angular momentum and D value. The comprehensive factors above are responsible for the difference in the magnetic behavior between 1 and 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A dinuclear dysprosium cluster [Dy2(NO3)4(H2O)2(L)2]·2CH3CN was successfully prepared by employing HL (HL = 2,6-dimethoxyphenol) and Dy(NO3)3·6H2O in a mixture of CH3OH and CH3CN. The conversion of this Dy2 compound by reaction with additional deprotonated ligand generated a Dy9 cluster [Dy9(μ4-OH)2(μ3-OH)8(μ2-OCH3)4(NO3)8(H2O)8(L)4](OH)·2H2O with the well-known "diabolo" topology. Magnetic investigation revealed that both of the clusters exhibit typical SMM characteristics, and variable magnetic relaxation with the energy barrier changing from 217.87 K to 9.24 K along with the transition from a dinuclear dysprosium cluster to a nonanuclear one. Ab initio calculations further confirm the corresponding structure–activity relationships that originate the different magnetic behaviours. This design may afford a feasible strategy for modulating the magnetic relaxation dynamics of polynuclear systems. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A series of five mononuclear β-diketonate-Dy(III) complexes, with formulas Dy(ntfa)3(Br-bpy) (1), Dy(ntfa)3(Br2-bpy) (2), Dy(ntfa)3(5,5-(CH3)2-bpy) (3), Dy(ntfa)3(4,4-((CH3)3)2-bpy) (4) and Dy(ntfa)3(4,4-(CH3)2-bpy) (5) (ntfa = 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-(2-naphthyl)-1,3-butanedione, Br-bpy = 5-bromo-2,2′-bipyridine, Br2-bpy = 4,4′-dibromo-2,2′-bipyridine, 5,5-(CH3)2-bpy = 5,5′-di-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine, 4,4-((CH3)3)2-bpy = 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine, and 4,4-(CH3)2-bpy = 4,4′-di-methyl-2,2′-bipyridine), have been prepared by altering the capping N-donor coligands. Dy(III) ions in all complexes possess N2O6 octa-coordinated environments, displaying a distorted square antiprismatic D4d symmetry in complexes 1–4, as well as a triangular dodecahedron D2d symmetry in 5. Magnetic investigations evidence the SIM behavior in the five complexes with the energy barriers (Ueff) of 104.19 K (1), 122.93 K (2), 84.20 K (3), 64.16 K (4) and 80.23 K (5) under zero applied dc field. The potential QTM effects in the title complexes are successfully suppressed in the presence of the extra applied fields. The crystal field parameters and orientations of the magnetic easy axes were obtained from the simulation of the magnetic data and the electrostatic model calculation. The distinct electronic effects originating from the subtle changes of the substituents on the capping N-donor coligands induce varying coordination microenvironments and geometries on the Dy(III) sites, further drastically impacting the overall magnetic properties of the title complexes. The disparities of the uniaxial anisotropy and the magnetic dynamics for 1–5 have been elucidated by ab initio calculations as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The utilization of two isomorphic ligands with different substituents leads to two centrosymmetric DyIII dimers, namely, [Dy2(bfbpen)2(H2O)2]·2I− (1) and [Dy2(bcbpen)2(H2O)2]·2I−·0.5H2O (2) (H2bfbpen = N,N′-bis-(2-hydroxy-5-fluoro-benzyl)-N,N′-bis-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethylenediamine and H2bcbpen = N,N′-bis-(2-hydroxy-5-chloro-benzyl)-N,N′-bis-(pyridin-2-ylmethyl)ethylenediamine). Although Dy ions in both compounds uniformly exhibit a square-antiprism geometry, the critical difference found in the terminal substituents of the two ligands fine-tunes the local crystal field around Dy centers and the dinuclear molecular structures of 1 and 2. Magnetic investigations unveil that both 1 and 2 display dynamic magnetic relaxation of single-molecule magnet (SMM) behaviour with different energy barriers of 20.9 K for 1 and 72.7 K for 2 under a zero direct-current (dc) field, as well as 26.9 K for 1 under a 1200 Oe dc field. Compared to 1, the stronger uniaxial anisotropy and magnetic exchange in 2 render it a better SMM as evidenced by the higher energy barrier. Ab initio calculations are also performed on both Dy2 compounds to rationalize the observed discrepancy in their magnetic behaviours. The contribution illustrates that the SMM behaviour could be effectively enhanced by means of deliberate local structural manipulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]