Search

Objective : To determine whether the positivity of baseline anti-Ro/Sjögren's syndrome antigen A (SSA) antibodies influences the response to abatacept, we compared therapeutic responses between anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative and -positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using a multicentre RA ultrasonography prospective cohort. Method : We reviewed Japanese patients with RA who started abatacept as the first biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug between June 2013 and April 2018. We assessed 28-joint Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) change between baseline and 6 or 12 months after treatment in RA patients treated with abatacept, and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response at 6 and 12 months. The Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS) was calculated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Results : Overall, 51 patients were enrolled and divided into anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative and -positive groups of 35 and 16, respectively. Median age at baseline was significantly higher in the anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative group (p = 0.04). The retention rate and percentage of EULAR good responders at 12 months were significantly higher in the anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative group (both p = 0.02). Anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative patients exhibited larger decreases in both DAS28-ESR and DAS28-C-reactive protein at 12 months than anti-Ro/SSA antibody-positive patients (p = 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). GLOESS decreased significantly at 6 months in anti-Ro/SSA antibody-negative patients (p = 0.03). Multivariate analyses showed that anti-Ro/SSA antibody positivity was an independent factor associated with change in the DAS28-ESR at 6 months (p < 0.05). Conclusion : Anti-Ro/SSA antibody positivity predicts a poor response to abatacept and low retention rate.

Objective : Successful rheumatoid arthritis (RA) outcome depends on treatment efficacy in the early stages of the disease and its sustainability. It is thus critical to identify factors predicting treatment persistence with biological agents, such as abatacept. We compared clinical profiles, including early changes in autoantibody titres at 3 months, between patients with RA demonstrating sustained persistence and those discontinuing abatacept treatment. Method : We prospectively enrolled 71 and 78 active RA patients treated with abatacept and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-Is), respectively, who had previous disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug) failure. Clinical characteristics were compared between non-continuation and continuation groups stratified according to abatacept or TNF-I persistence for at least 12 months from treatment initiation. Results : Significantly larger decreases in rheumatoid factor titre and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibody (ACPA) titre were observed in the continuation group of abatacept therapy at 3 months, and early reduction in ACPA titre remained a significant and independent predictor of sustained persistence with abatacept in multivariate analysis. In addition, we obtained the area under the receiver operator characteristics curve of 0.904 from a model including baseline ACPA titre and reduction of ACPA titre at 3 months. Sustained reduction of RA disease activity score at 12 months was significantly and independently associated with reduced ACPA titre at 3 months. Conclusions : Persistence with abatacept and sustained therapeutic response are associated with an early reduction in ACPA titre. Prediction of abatacept continuation and efficacy will facilitate the optimal design of therapy in the early stages of RA.