Search

Abstract: We evaluated the effect of abatacept treatment on osteoclast-related biomarkers and explored whether the biomarkers are associated with the therapeutic response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with abatacept.We enrolled 44 RA patients treated with abatacept from a multicenter prospective ultrasound cohort study of patients who received biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy. We evaluated the disease activity score (DAS) 28-CRP (C-reactive protein), musculoskeletal ultrasound scores including the total grayscale score (GS)/power Doppler (PD) score and the serum concentrations of isoform 5b of tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRACP-5b) and soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (sRANKL) at baseline and at 3 and 6 months of treatment. "PD responder" was defined as a patient whose Δtotal PD score over 6 months was greater than the median change of that.Abatacept significantly improved DAS28-CRP as well as the total GS/PD score over 6 months. Serum TRACP-5b was significantly elevated and serum sRANKL was significantly decreased at 6 months (P < .0001 and P < .01, respectively). At 6 months, serum sRANKL was significantly decreased in the patients who achieved DAS28-CRP remission and the PD responders but not in those who did not. However, serum TRACP-5b rose regardless of the therapeutic response.Among RA patients treated with abatacept, serum sRANKL decreased in the patients with a good therapeutic response, but serum TRACP-5b elevated paradoxically regardless of the therapeutic response., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

To compare therapeutic efficacy of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) cyclers and non-TNFi switchers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) having inadequate response to previous TNFis (TNF-IR patients) using composite measures including imaging assessment with power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS). Patients with RA who had inadequate response to one or more previous TNFi agents with moderate or higher disease activity were enrolled. The outcomes of 56 TNF-IR patients were analysed. Patients were divided into 19 TNFi cyclers and 37 non-TNFi switchers (16 abatacept [ABT] and 21 tocilizumab [TCZ] switchers). Retention ratio at 6 months was significantly higher in non-TNFi switchers than in TNFi cyclers ( p  < .05). Although there was no significant difference, non-TNFi switchers tended to have a larger decrease than TNFi cyclers in efficacy indicators based on clinical disease activity index and PDUS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified a following independent factor associated with both EULAR good response and retention of a biologic agent: non-TNFi switch ( p  < .05 for both). Non-TNFi switchers were shown to have significantly higher percentage of EULAR good response and higher retention than TNFi cyclers. A non-TNFi biologic agent may hence be a preferential next-line treatment for TNF-IR patients.