1. Do patients requiring a multivisceral resection for rectal cancer have worse oncologic outcomes than patients undergoing only abdominoperineal resection?
- Author
-
Dosokey EMG, Brady JT, Neupane R, Jabir MA, Stein SL, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP, and Steele SR
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasm Invasiveness, Rectal Neoplasms pathology, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Abdomen surgery, Abdominal Neoplasms surgery, Perineum surgery, Rectal Neoplasms surgery, Viscera surgery
- Abstract
Introduction: Abdominoperineal Resection (APR) remains an important option for patients with advanced rectal cancer though some may require multivisceral resection (MVR) in addition to APR. We hypothesized that oncological outcomes would be worse with MVR., Methods: A retrospective review from 2006 to 2015 of 161 patients undergoing APR or MVR for rectal cancer, of whom 118 underwent curative APR or APR with MVR. Perioperative, oncologic and survival metrics were evaluated., Results: There were 82 patients who underwent APR and 36 who underwent MVR. Surgical approach and incidence of complications were similar (All P > 0.05). There was 1 local recurrence in each of the APR and MVR groups at a mean follow-up of 34 and 32 months, respectively. Distant recurrences occurred in 3 APR patients and 4 MVR patients., Conclusions: APR and APR with MVR can be performed with comparable morbidity and oncologic outcomes., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF