Search

Background: The use of drains in patients undergoing abdominal surgery has been a subject of debate for several decades. In this paper, the usefulness of quantitative cultures of sonicated abdominal drains for diagnosing surgical site of infection (SSI) and the association between culture results with patient outcome is evaluated.Methods: Forty-five abdominal drainage tubes from 35 patients who underwent abdominal surgery were studied. Samples were sonicated for 5 min, the sonicate was centrifuged, and the sediment was cultured on different media. Total bacterial counts were adjusted to the actual surface of the drainage tubing. Clinical information of the patients was reviewed retrospectively.Results: A relation was observed between SSI and the use of drains for more than 3 d (p = 0.0216). The presence of a suspected pathogen was related to the prevalence of SSI (p = 0.035), complications (p = 0.013), and greater leukocyte count (p = 0.048 Mann Whitney test), as well as to the use of drains for more than 3 d (p = 0.0386) and to the serous appearance of the exudates at the point of insertion of the drain (p = 0.0399). The sonication procedure showed a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 84.2%, positive predictive value of 72.72%, and negative predictive value of 66.67% in the diagnosis of SSI. The most commonly isolated group of organisms was coagulase-negative staphylococci, being present in 18 patients (51.43%) who, however, were not associated with SSI. One or two organisms considered as pathogens were detected in 11 patients (31.43%). The more common pathogens detected were Enterobacteriae spp. (nine patients): Enterobacter aerogenes (2), Enterobacter cloacae (1), Escherichia coli (4), Klebsiella pneumoniae (1), Morganella morganii (1); and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (five patients). Candida spp. and Enterococcus spp. were detected in one patient each one.Conclusions: The detection and quantification of organisms not present in skin microbiota after drain sonication is helpful in the diagnosis of SSI and it is associated with a worse outcome in patients. Duration of use of drainage tubes is an independent risk factor for the development of SSI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We studied the influence of morphology and type of material of abdominal wall prostheses in the avoidance of bacterial adhesion in acute and chronic mesh infections. Methods: Three different types of prostheses were compared: 1) High-density polypropylene monofilament mesh (PMM); 2) low-density PMM; and 3) prostheses composed of low-density polypropylene and a non-porous hydrophilic film (composite prostheses). Microbial adhesion tests were performed using reference strains of Staphylococcus aureus 15981, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 35984, Mycobacterium abscessus DSM 44196, and Mycobacterium fortuitum ATCC 13756 using a protocol described previously. Results: Both Staphylococcus spp. and M. fortuitum strains showed lower adherence to PMM. Mycobacterium abscessus also exhibited lower adherence to composite prostheses. Both Mycobacterium spp. strains had lower adherence than Staphylococcus spp. strains for all materials except for low-density PMM. Mycobacterium fortuitum showed higher adherence to composite prostheses than M. abscessus, whereas the latter species had higher adherence to high-density PMM than M. fortuitum. Conclusion: Depending on the type of bacteria, collagen-coated hydrophilic prostheses with a large surface increased bacterial adherence significantly. These differences should be taken into consideration when choosing a mesh graft, which limits infection in abdominal wall reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]