Search

Hernia is a ubiquitous patho-anatomical surgical entity that a surgeon encounters and treats employing various methods and following certain principles to affect a durable repair. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the bio-physiology and mechanics of the abdominal wall coupled with innovations in surgical technique and evolution of novel procedures has created a sphere of reconstructive surgery wherein large complex hernias can be treated. There are various technical factors pertaining to a hernia repair including the surgical approach, extent and plane of dissection, the use of component separation, and placement of the mesh which needs to be addressed to bring about an optimum result. Complex hernias with loss of domain pose a challenge wherein an abdominal wall repair surgeon is tasked to bring about a tissue-based reconstruction with prosthetic reinforcement utilizing the now available various pre-operative tissue expansion techniques followed by a myofascial advancement procedure. With the advent and adoption of minimal invasive surgery, such procedures can be effectively undertaken in centers with available expertise. Similarly, groin hernias are now treated using a laparo-endoscopic approach. The modern abdominal wall repair surgeon should have in his armamentarium the knowledge and skill to effectively carry out a hernia repair with minimum morbidity but without affecting the durability or compromising the basic underlying principles. In this review, we endeavor to address these relevant issues so that an informed decision making for the accomplishment of a safe hernia surgery can be taken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous observational studies showed higher rates of abdominal wall closure with the use of hypertonic saline in trauma patients with abdominal injuries. However, no randomized controlled trials have been performed on this matter. This double-blind randomized clinical trial assessed the effect of 3% hypertonic saline (HS) solution on primary fascial closure and the timing of abdominal wall closure among patients who underwent damage control laparotomy for bleeding control. Methods: Double-blind randomized clinical trial. Patients with abdominal injuries requiring damage control laparotomy (DCL) were randomly allocated to receive a 72-h infusion (rate: 50 mL/h) of 3% HS or 0.9 N isotonic saline (NS) after the index DCL. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with abdominal wall closure in the first seven days after the index DCL. Results: The study was suspended in the first interim analysis because of futility. A total of 52 patients were included. Of these, 27 and 25 were randomly allocated to NS and HS, respectively. There were no significant differences in the rates of abdominal wall closure between groups (HS: 19 [79.2%] vs. NS: 17 [70.8%]; p = 0.71). In contrast, significantly higher hypernatremia rates were observed in the HS group (HS: 11 [44%] vs. NS: 1 [3.7%]; p < 0.001). Conclusion: This double-blind randomized clinical trial showed no benefit of HS solution in primary fascial closure rates. Patients randomized to HS had higher sodium concentrations after the first day and were more likely to present hypernatremia. We do not recommend using HS in patients undergoing damage control laparotomy. Trial registration The trial protocol was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02542241). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Joint exposure with an extensive skin defect following soft tissue tumor resection might cause a refractory ulcer. Although a vascularized tissue transplant is ideal for ulcer treatment, it is a highly invasive procedure and usually unsuitable for older patients with general prostration. One-stage perifascial areolar tissue (PAT) and skin grafting combined with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is less invasive and effective procedure for refractory wounds with exposed bones and tendons. This is the first case where this procedure was used to treat a wound that involved an exposed elbow joint with an extensive skin defect. An 80-year-old woman underwent wide excision to remove a leiomyosarcoma on the olecranon with reconstruction using an ipsilateral pedicled latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. The distal three-quarter of the flap was necrosed owing to insufficient blood supply. Furthermore, an articular capsule deficit of 1.5 × 1.0 cm2 was found during necrotomy. The PAT was harvested from the lower abdomen as a non-vascularized tissue, and the articular capsule deficit was covered by overlapping on the granulation tissue around the deficit. Simultaneous split-thickness skin grafting combined with NPWT was applied on the PAT and residual skin defect. Wound healing was achieved in 4 weeks postoperatively without synovial fluid leakage. Elbow joint motion ranging from 0 to 120° was maintained 18 months postoperatively. This procedure helped achieve better wound healing and sufficient functional outcome. Furthermore, this can help decrease patients' burden by preventing invasive resections associated with severe functional impairments or long-term rehabilitation requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is advised that we should never hesitate in leaving the abdomen open when required. However, once the patient is stabilised, we should close it as soon as possible. But the factors which would hamper delayed primary fascial closure (DPFC) are not well studied. A retrospective 5-year analysis of patients with open abdomen (OA) after trauma laparotomy who survived was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those in which DPFC was possible and those in whom it was not. Out of the 58 patients that were recruited, DPFC could not be performed in 48 patients. Quantum of fluid resuscitation at 48 h was not associated with an inability to perform DPFC. Early definitive control of bleeding and damage control resuscitation are associated with the ability to perform DPFC in OA patients. Presence of blood stream infections (BSIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) precluded DPFC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Damage control laparotomy (DCL) is used for both traumatic and non-traumatic indications. Failure to achieve primary fascial closure (PFC) in a timely fashion has been associated with complications including sepsis, fistula, and mortality. We sought to identify factors associated with time to PFC in a multicenter retrospective cohort. Methods: We reviewed retrospective data from 15 centers in the EAST SLEEP-TIME registry, including age, comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI]), small and large bowel resection, bowel discontinuity, vascular procedures, retained packs, number of re-laparotomies, net fluid balance after 24 h, trauma, and time to first takeback in 12-h increments to identify key factors associated with time to PFC. Results: In total, 368 patients (71.2% trauma, of which 50.6% were penetrating, median ISS 25 [16, 34], with median Apache II score 15 [11, 22] in non-trauma) were in the cohort. Of these, 92.9% of patients achieved PFC at 60.8 ± 72.0 h after 1.6 ± 1.2 re-laparotomies. Each additional re-laparotomy reduced the odds of PFC by 91.5% (95%CI 88.2–93.9%, p < 0.001). Time to first re-laparotomy was highly significant (p < 0.001) in terms of odds of achieving PFC, with no difference between 12 and 24 h to first re-laparotomy (ref), and decreases in odds of PFC of 78.4% (65.8–86.4%, p < 0.001) for first re-laparotomy after 24.1–36 h, 90.8% (84.7–94.4%, p < 0.001) for 36.1–48 h, and 98.1% (96.4–99.0%, p < 0.001) for > 48 h. Trauma patients had increased likelihood of PFC in two separate analyses (p = 0.022 and 0.002). Conclusion: Time to re-laparotomy ≤ 24 h and minimizing number of re-laparotomies are highly predictive of rapid achievement of PFC in patients after trauma- and non-trauma DCL. Level of evidence: 2B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Sedation management of trauma patients after damage control laparotomy (DCL) has not been optimized. We evaluated if shorter sedation exposure was associated with increased proportion of delirium-free/coma-free (DF/CF-ICU) days and change in time to definitive fascial closure (DFC). Methods: We reviewed trauma DCL patients at an ACS-verified level I center over 5 years as shorter (SE) or longer than median (LE) sedation exposure. We compared demographics, injury patterns, hemodynamic parameters, and injury severity between groups. We calculated the propensity for each patient to achieve DFC using age, gender, ISS, red blood cell transfusion, bowel discontinuity, abdominal vascular injury, and time to first takeback; we then determined the effect of sedation exposure on rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression, adjusted for propensity to achieve DFC. We used linear regression adjusted for age, ISS, head-AIS, bowel discontinuity, and vascular injury to determine the effect of sedation exposure on the proportion of DF/CF-ICU days. Results: 65 patients (33.8% penetrating) had mean age 41.8 ± 16.0, ISS 27.1 ± 14.2, Head-AIS 1.2 ± 1.6 and median sedation exposure of 2.2 [IQR 0.78, 7.3] days (35 SE and 30 LE). Pattern and severity of solid organ injuries and proportion of small and large bowel and vascular injuries were similar between groups. LE had more abdominal sepsis (23.3% vs 0%, p = 0.003) and enterocutaneous fistula (16.7% vs 0%, p = 0.016), and more ventilator (17.3 ± 12.7 vs 6.1 ± 6.8, p < 0.001), ICU (20.8 ± 14.2 vs 7.2 ± 7.6, p < 0.001), and hospital days (29.6 ± 19.6 vs 13.9 ± 9.0, p < 0.001). DFC was achieved more rapidly in the SE group (2.0 ± 1.5 days vs 3.9 ± 3.7 days [unadjusted], p = 0.023) and SE had a higher proportion of unadjusted DF/CF-ICU days (33.0 ± 32.0% vs 18.1 ± 16.4%, p = 0.020). SE was associated with an increased proportion of adjusted DF/CF-ICU days by multivariate linear regression (13.1% [95% CI 1.4–24.8%], p = 0.029) and with faster adjusted rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression (RR 2.28 [95% CI 1.25–4.15, p = 0.007]). Conclusions: Shorter sedation exposure is associated with increased proportion of DF/CF-ICU days and more rapid DFC after DCL for trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Long-term follow-up for pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap with vastus lateralis and tensor fascia lata for complex abdominal wall reconstruction is rarely reported. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of extended pedicled ALT flap.Methods: This retrospective review was conducted at a single medical center between 2011 and 2018. A total of 35 patients with complex abdominal wall defects reconstructed with partition (n = 20) or pedicled ALT flap (n = 15) were enrolled. Data on gender, age, fascial defect size, operation time, hospital days, follow-up duration, and complications were obtained. Mann-Whitney test evaluated the differences in continuous data, and Chi-square test analyzed categorical data.Results: The partition technique was associated with 10.15 cm (range 8-14 cm) mean defect size, 146 min average operation time, 13.5 hospital days, and 95.42 months of mean follow-up duration. Short- and long-term complications were observed in seven (35%) and six (30%) cases, respectively. The pedicled ALT flap technique was associated with 13.4 cm (range 10.6-16 cm), 342.86 min average operation time, 22.33 hospital days, and 69.4 months of mean follow-up duration. Short- and long-term complications were observed in six (40%) and five (33%) cases, respectively. Significant differences in defect size, operative time, hospital days, and donor-site skin graft loss (p < 0.05) were observed between the groups.Conclusions: Extended pedicled ALT flap is a reliable option for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Compared with the partition technique group, the extended pedicled ALT group had closure of larger fascia defects. However, it was associated with a higher risk of donor-site skin graft loss and longer operative time and hospital days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: We aim to present a modified technique and outcomes of a novel method allowing for direct visualization of the reservoir placement during a penoscrotal inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP). Methods: Out of165 patients who underwent IPP placement from August 2012 to March 2015, 157 underwent a modified technique and comprised the cohort of this study. A Deaver's retractor was placed lateral to the penis and over the pubic bone to allow for direct visualization of the tissues overlying the lower abdomen. After dissecting through the superficial layers, the Deaver's was slowly advanced, allowing for visualization of the fascia, which was incised. Using blunt dissection, a space for the reservoir was created between the bladder and the pubic bone. The reservoir was then placed safely into this space and the Deaver's retractor was removed. Results: The causes of ED in the study cohort included postprostatectomy ED (n = 107), organic impotence (n = 40), Peyronie's disease (n = 3), ED following cystoprostatectomy (n = 2), ED due to spinal cord injury (n = 2), ED resulting from priapism (n = 2), and ED after pelvic injury (n = 1); all of which were refractory to medical management. The median age of study population was 66 years and the mean (standard deviation) operative time was 72.8 (14.7) min. Eighty percent of the procedures were performed on outpatient basis. Complication rates were low (<5%), with four infections, one proximal pump migration, one scrotal hematoma, and one urinary tract infection. Conclusion: The modified technique for placement of the IPP's spherical reservoir under direct visualization through a penoscrotal incision is quick, safe, and effective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hemodynamic resuscitation, source control, and delayed abdominal closure are the three fundamental steps for open abdomen (OA) management. When to start delayed abdominal closure and how to determine which delayed closure method should be applied to each OA patient are not clarified in the literature. We evaluated an algorithm that was developed to address these two questions. A retrospective chart review was conducted for OA patients treated for according to the algorithm. When hemodynamic stabilization and source control using negative pressure therapy resulted in regression of sepsis and decreased procalcitonin levels, patients were assigned to either the skin-only or fascial closure groups according to their Björck scores and open abdominal fascial closure (OAFC) scores. The novel OAFC scoring system was created by adding age and malignancy to the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score. For skin-only closure, skin flaps and skin grafts were used; for fascial closure, an abdominal re-approximation anchor system (ABRA) or ABRA plus biologic mesh was applied. From January 2008 through September 2014, 108 OA patients were managed based on the algorithm; 61 were included in this study. Abdominal closure rate was 90.2 % (55/61). Overall hospital mortality rate was 11.4 % (7/61). Small hernias developed in only 12.5 % (4/32) of the fascial closure group. In this retrospective study, the algorithm with the novel OAFC score provided practical and valid guidance to clarify when to start delayed abdominal closure and which delayed closure method to use for each OA patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of abdominal wall closure using the vacuum-assisted closure (NPC) as described by Barker et al. with an institutional protocol using a double polyvinyl bag in the first surgery, which is changed in subsequent surgeries to a polyvinyl bag placed over the bowel loops and a prolene mesh attached to the abdominal fascia (MMFC).Methods: Randomized controlled trial. Patients with open abdomen (OA) due to a traumatic or a medical cause were included in the study. Variables studied included demographics, indication for surgery, number of interventions, hospital length of stay (HLOS), ICU length of stay, abdominal wound care costs, complication rates, and method and time to definitive fascial closure.Results: From June 2011 to April 2013, 75 patients were enrolled in the study. Patients who died within 48 h were excluded; therefore, 53 patients in total were assessed. NPC achieved fascial closure in 75% of patients, and MMFC achieved closure in 71.9% of patients. The closure rates in patients with OA secondary to medical causes (80% by NPC vs. 71.4% by MMFC) or traumatic causes (70% by NPC vs. 73.7% by MMFC) were similar in both treatment groups. There were no differences between the groups with respect to cause of OA, complications, length of hospital stay, or the length of stay in the intensive care unit.Conclusion: MMFC is a method comparable to NPC for the temporary management of OA that results in similar closure and complication rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To systematically review the available literature regarding methods for abdominal wall expansion and compare the outcome of primary fascial closure rates.Methods: A systematic search of Pubmed and Embase databases was conducted using the search terms "Abdominal wall hernia", "ventral hernia", "midline hernia", "Botulinum toxin", "botox", "dysport", "progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum", and "tissue expanders". Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies.Results: 21 of the 105 studies identified met the inclusion criteria. Progressive preoperative pneumoperitoneum (PPP) was performed in 269 patients across 15 studies with primary fascial closure being achieved in 226 (84%). 16 patients had a recurrence (7.2%) and the complication rate was 12% with 2 reported mortalities. There were 4 studies with 14 patients in total undergoing abdominal wall expansion using tissue expanders with a fascial closure rate of 92.9% (n = 13). A recurrence rate of 10.0% (n = 1) was reported with 1 complication and no mortalities. Follow up ranged from 3 to 36 months across the studies. There were 2 studies reporting the use of botulinum toxin with 29 patients in total. A primary fascial closure rate of 100% (n = 29) was demonstrated although a combination of techniques including component separation and Rives-Stoppa repair were used. There were no reported complications related to the use of Botulinum Toxin. However, the short-term follow up in many cases and the lack of routine radiological assessment for recurrence suggests that the recurrence rate has been underestimated.Conclusions: PPP, tissue expanders and Botulinum toxin are safe and feasible methods for abdominal wall expansion prior to incisional hernia repair. In combination with existing techniques for repair, these methods may help provide the crucial extra tissue mobility required to achieve primary closure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The open abdomen (OA) procedure is a significant surgical advance, as part of damage control techniques in severe abdominal trauma. Its application can be adapted to the advantage of patients with severe abdominal sepsis, however its precise role in these patients is still not clear. In severe abdominal sepsis the OA may allow early identification and draining of any residual infection, control any persistent source of infection, and remove more effectively infected or cytokine-loaded peritoneal fluid, preventing abdominal compartment syndrome and deferring definitive intervention and anastomosis until the patient is appropriately resuscitated and hemodynamically stable and thus better able to heal. However, the OA may require multiple returns to the operating room and may be associated with significant complications, including enteroatmospheric fistulas, loss of abdominal wall domain and large hernias. Surgeons should be aware of the pathophysiology of severe intra-abdominal sepsis and always keep in mind the option of using open abdomen to be able to use it in the right patient at the right time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The use of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) for temporary abdominal closure of open abdomen (OA) wounds is widely accepted. Published outcomes vary according to the specific nature and the aetiology that resulted in an OA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a new NPWT system specifically used OA resulting from abdominal trauma. Methods: A prospective study on trauma patients requiring temporary abdominal closure (TAC) with grade 1or 2 OA was carried out. All patients were treated with NPWT (RENASYS AB Smith & Nephew) to achieve TAC. The primary outcome measure was time taken to achieve fascial closure and secondary outcomes were complications and mortality. Results: A total of 20 patients were included. Thirteen patients (65%) achieved fascial closure following a median treatment period of 3 days. Four patients (20%) died of causes unrelated to NPWT. Complications included fistula formation in one patient (5%) with spontaneous resolution during NPWT), bowel necrosis in a single patient (5%) and three cases of infection (15%). No fistulae were present at the end of NPWT. Conclusion: This new NPWT kit is safe and effective and results in a high rate of fascial closure and low complication rates in the severely injured trauma patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Open abdomen management applies to a variety of traumatic and inflammatory abdominal conditions. One complication of this technique is inability to achieve primary closure of the abdominal wall. The aim of this study was to determine if the number of abdominal reexplorations influences the success of abdominal closure. METHODS: A review of patients undergoing open abdomen management from January 2007 to 2010 was performed. The indication for surgery, number of operations, and success at primary fascia closure were tabulated. A synthetic or biologic mesh bridge was considered failure to achieve closure. RESULTS: One hundred four patients underwent open abdomen management for trauma, postop-erative hemorrhage, infected pancreatic necrosis, and perforated viscus or anastomotic leak. Reopera-tions ranged from 2 to 25, with a mean of 4.5 reoperations. Primary fascia closure was achieved in 82 patients (79%). Fascia closure was successful in 93% of patients with <4 reoperations, whereas closure occurred in 32% of patients having >5 reoperations (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Greater than 4 reoperations is significantly associated with failure of the primary fascia closure. Efforts to obtain closure should be undertaken within 4 reoperations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Polytrauma patients needing aggressive resuscitation can develop intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) with subsequent secondary abdominal compartment syndrome (SACS). After patients fail medical therapy, decompressive laparotomy is the surgical last resort. In patients with severe pancreatitis SACS, the use of linea alba fasciotomy (LAF) is an effective intervention to lower IAH without the morbidity of laparotomy. A pilot study of LAF was designed to evaluate its benefit in patients with SACS polytrauma. We conducted an observational study of blunt injury polytrauma patients undergoing LAF. Variables measured before and after LAF included intra-abdominal pressure (IAP, mmHg), abdominal perfusion pressure (APP, mmHg), right ventricular end diastolic volume index (RVEDVI, mL/m²), and ejection fraction. Of the five trauma patients with SACS, the mean age was 36 ± 17, four (80%) male with an Injury Severity Score of 27 ± 9. Pre- and post-LAF, IAP was 20.6 ± 4.7 and 10.6 ± 2.7 (P < 0.0001), APP 55.2 ± 5.5 and 77.6 ± 7.1 (P < 0.0001), RVEDVI 86.4 ± 9.3 and 123.6 ± 11.9 (P < 0.0001), and EF 27.6 ± 4.2 and 40.8 ± 5 (P < 0.0001), respectively. One patient needed full decompression for bile ascites from unrecognized liver injury. Linea alba fasciotomy, as a first-line intervention before committing to full abdominal decompression in patients with SACS trauma, improved physiological variables without mortality. Consideration for LAF as a bridge before full abdominal decompression needs further evaluation in patients with polytrauma SACS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Damage control surgery has revolutionized trauma surgery. Use of damage control surgery allows for resuscitation and reversal of coagulopathy at the risk of loss of abdominal domain and intra-abdominal complications. Temporary abdominal closure is possible with multiple techniques, the choice of which may affect ability to achieve primary fascial closure and further complication. Methods: A retrospective analysis of all trauma patients requiring damage control laparotomy upon admission to an ACS-verified level one trauma center from 2011 to 2016 was performed. Demographic and clinical data including ability and time to attain primary fascial closure, as well as complication rates, were recorded. The primary outcome measure was ability to achieve primary fascial closure during initial hospitalization. Results: Two hundred and thirty-nine patients met criteria for inclusion. Primary skin closure (57.7%), ABThera™ VAC system (ABT) (15.1%), Bogota bag (BB) (25.1%), or a modified Barker’s vacuum-packing (BVP) (2.1%) were used in the initial laparotomy. Patients receiving skin-only closure had significantly higher rates of primary fascial closure and lower hospital mortality, but also significantly lower mean lactate, base deficit, and requirement for massive transfusion. Between ABT or BB, use of ABT was associated with increased rates of fascial closure. Multivariate regression revealed primary skin closure to be significantly associated with primary fascial closure while BB was associated with failure to achieve fascial closure. Conclusions: Primary skin closure is a viable option in the initial management of the open abdomen, although these patients demonstrated less injury burden in our study. Use of vacuum-assisted dressings continues to be the preferred method for temporary abdominal closure in damage control surgery for trauma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As laparoscopic surgery evolves, a growing number of different abdominal operations can now be performed. This necessitates the use of multiple large trocars. Herniation through the fascial defect created by trocar entry in laparoscopic interventions has been reported at a rate of 1–6%. We describe a simple closure technique for fascial defects at trocar sites after laparoscopic surgery. To facilitate the closure of the fascial defects of &NotGreaterSlantEqual;10mm trocar entry sites, the surgeon places the upper end of a dissecting forceps through the fascial defect and tilts it so that the abdominal of the peritoneum comes into contact with its flat surface. The assistant retracts the skin and subcutaneous tissue and the “J” needle with the appropriate suture material is then used to take a stitch through the fascia under direct vision. The sharp end of the needle is prevented from coming into contact with any deeper structure as it slides on the flat surface of the dissecting forceps. The stitch is then pulled up to lift the edge of the fascia and the needle is passed from the opposite edge of the fascia in the same manner and then the suture is ligated. The aforementioned technique is easy to perform and facilitates the closure of the fascial defect at trocar sites, and there is no extra cost for the procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]