Search

Purpose: To review the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of epithelium-off corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for the treatment of progressive corneal ectasia., Methods: A literature search of the PubMed database was most recently conducted in March 2024 with no date restrictions and limited to studies published in English. The search identified 359 citations that were reviewed in abstract form, and 43 of these were reviewed in full text. High-quality randomized clinical trials comparing epithelium-off CXL with conservative treatment in patients who have keratoconus (KCN) and post-refractive surgery ectasia were included. The panel deemed 6 articles to be of sufficient relevance for inclusion, and these were assessed for quality by the panel methodologist; 5 were rated level I, and 1 was rated level II. There were no level III studies., Results: This analysis includes 6 prospective, randomized controlled trials that evaluated the use of epithelium-off CXL to treat progressive KCN (5 studies) and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia (1 study), with a mean postoperative follow-up of 2.4 years (range, 1-5 years). All studies showed a decreased progression rate in treated patients compared with controls. Improvement in the maximum keratometry (Kmax) value, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was observed in the treatment groups compared with control groups. A decrease in corneal thickness was observed in both groups but was greater in the CXL group. Complications were rare., Conclusions: Epithelium-off CXL is effective in reducing the progression of KCN and post-laser refractive surgery ectasia in most treated patients with an acceptable safety profile., Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To describe the safety and effectiveness of using autologous serum-based eye drops for the treatment of severe dry eye and persistent corneal epithelial defect., Methods: Literature searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were conducted most recently in March 2019. The searches identified 281 citations, which were reviewed in abstract form. Of these, 48 were selected for a full-text review, and 13 met the inclusion criteria and were assigned a quality-of-evidence rating by the panel methodologist. Eight of these studies were rated level II and 5 were rated level III; there were no level I studies., Results: This analysis included 10 studies of the use of autologous serum-based eye drops for severe dry eye disease and 4 studies of persistent epithelial defect. Several studies showed good effectiveness, with some improvement in symptoms, signs, or both. Eight of the studies reported improved symptoms for severe dry eye disease, and all noted improvement in at least 1 clinical sign. For persistent epithelial defects, all of the studies showed improvement, with 3 of the 4 demonstrating an improvement rate of more than 90%. Adverse events were rare., Conclusions: Although autologous serum-based tears may be effective in the treatment of severe dry eye and persistent epithelial defect, conclusions are limited owing to the absence of controlled trials., (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To review the published literature on the safety and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction., Methods: Literature searches were last conducted in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases most recently in May 2017. The searches, which were limited to English-language abstracts, yielded 1085 articles. The panel reviewed the abstracts, and 47 were determined to be relevant to this assessment., Results: After DMEK surgery, the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/21 to 20/31, with follow-up ranging from 5.7 to 68 months. At 6 months, 37.6% to 85% of eyes achieved BCVA of 20/25 or better and 17% to 67% achieved BCVA of 20/20 or better. Mean endothelial cell (EC) loss was 33% (range, 25%-47%) at 6 months. Overall change in spherical equivalent was +0.43 diopters (D; range, -1.17 to +1.2 D), with minimal induced astigmatism of +0.03 D (range, -0.03 to +1.11 D). The most common complication was partial graft detachment requiring air injection (mean, 28.8%; range, 0.2%-76%). Intraocular pressure elevation was the second most common complication (range, 0%-22%) after DMEK, followed by primary graft failure (mean, 1.7%; range, 0%-12.5%), secondary graft failure (mean, 2.2%; range, 0%-6.3%), and immune rejection (mean, 1.9%; range, 0%-5.9%). Overall graft survival rates after DMEK ranged from 92% to 100% at last follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 months. The most common complications after DSEK were graft detachment (mean, 14%; range, 0%-82%), endothelial rejection (mean, 10%; range, 0%-45%), and primary graft failure (mean, 5%; range, 0%-29%). Mean EC loss after DSEK was 37% at 6 months., Conclusions: The evidence reviewed supports DMEK as a safe and effective treatment for endothelial failure. With respect to visual recovery time, visual outcomes, and rejection rates, DMEK seems to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar surgical risks and EC loss compared with DSEK. The rate of air injection and repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the learning curve for DMEK., (Copyright © 2017 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)