Search

Background: Pelvic fractures are rare but serious injuries. The influence of a concomitant abdominal trauma on the time point of surgery and the quality of care regarding quality of reduction or the clinical course in pelvic injuries has not been investigated yet. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the prospective consecutive cohort from the multicenter German Pelvic Registry of the German Trauma Society in the years 2003–2017. Demographic, clinical, and operative parameters were recorded and compared for two groups (isolated pelvic fracture vs. combined abdominal/pelvic trauma). Results: 16.359 patients with pelvic injuries were treated during this period. 21.6% had a concomitant abdominal trauma. The mean age was 61.4 ± 23.5 years. Comparing the two groups, patients with a combination of pelvic and abdominal trauma were significantly younger (47.3 ± 22.0 vs. 70.5 ± 20.4 years; p < 0.001). Both, complication (21.9% vs. 9.9%; p < 0.001) and mortality (8.0% vs. 1.9%; p < 0.001) rates, were significantly higher. In the subgroup of acetabular fractures, the operation time was significantly longer in the group with the combined injury (198 ± 104 vs. 176 ± 81 min, p = 0.001). The grade of successful anatomic reduction of the acetabular fracture did not differ between the two groups. Conclusion: Patients with a pelvic injury have a concomitant abdominal trauma in about 20% of the cases. The clinical course is significantly prolonged in patients with a combined injury, with increased rates of morbidity and mortality. However, the quality of the reduction in the subgroup of acetabular fractures is not influenced by a concomitant abdominal injury. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03952026, Registered 16 May 2019, retrospectively registered [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Fractures of the acetabulum show a high, long-term complication rate. The aim of the present study was to determine the predictive value of clinical scoring and standardized, simplified gait analysis on the outcome after these fractures. Methods Forty-one patients with acetabular fractures treated between 2008 and 2013 and available, standardized video recorded aftercare were identified from a prospective database. A visual gait score was used to determine the patients walking abilities 6-m postoperatively. Clinical (Merle d'Aubigne and Postel score, visual analogue scale pain, EQ5d) and radiological scoring (Kellgren–Lawrence score, postoperative computed tomography, and Matta classification) were used to perform correlation and multivariate regression analysis. Results The average patient age was 48 y (range, 15-82 y), six female patients were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 1.6 y (range, 1-2 y). Moderate correlation between the gait score and outcome ( versus EQ5d: r s = 0.477; versus Merle d'Aubigne: r s = 0.444; versus Kellgren–Lawrence: r s = −0.533), as well as high correlation between the Merle d'Aubigne score and outcome were seen ( versus EQ5d: r s = 0.575; versus Merle d'Aubigne: r s = 0.776; versus Kellgren–Lawrence: r s = −0.419). Using a multivariate regression model, the 6 m gait score (B = −0.299; P < 0.05) and early osteoarthritis development (B = 1.026; P < 0.05) were determined as predictors of final osteoarthritis. A good fit of the regression model was seen (R 2 = 904). Conclusions Easy and available clinical scoring (gait score/Merle d'Aubigne) can predict short-term radiological and functional outcome after acetabular fractures with sufficient accuracy. Decisions on further treatment and interventions could be based on simplified gait analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]