Search

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prospectively the prognostic power of various demographic and diagnostic parameters, as well as of medical history, for evaluating in elderly patients the probability of their requiring care and of their risk of dying soon. PATIENTS AND METHOD: All the elderly patients (> or = 70 years) of one general practitioner were included. Of 178 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 144 participated (93 women, 49 men; mean age 78.7 +/- 5.8 years). Demographic, basic diagnostic and medical history data of the kind that can be easily collected in general practice were recorded. The general practitioner was also asked to assess the probability of each patient requiring care and the likelihood of their dying soon. Several functional tests that record or measure daily activity were conducted. After 18 months all admissions to care, homes for the elderly or hospital and deaths were recorded. The different groups were compared. RESULTS: The probability of requiring care and of dying within the observation period were predicted more accurately by functional tests and questions than by conventional diagnostic methods. This was particularly so for functional investigations of basic daily activity, cognitive ability and manual skills. There were significant differences between the groups in the results of tests (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Functional tests can be rapidly performed and have high diagnostic and prognostic power. They are therefore recommended for use by general practitioners for assessing the probability of a given patient requiring care and for estimating the likelihood of early death.

To determine predictors of death, nursing home placement and hospital admission, a prospective study was carried out in a university-affiliated geriatric hospital and a general practice. One hundred and thirty-five patients consecutively admitted from home to the geriatric hospital and discharged home again (site 1), and 144 patients, aged 70 years and over, of a general practice (site 2) were recruited for a comprehensive geriatric assessment program. At baseline, none was completely dependent on others, or severely demented. At follow-up after 18 months, 46 subjects (17%) had died, 20 subjects (7%) had been institutionalized, and 79 had been admitted to hospital (28 %) in the interim. Univariate analysis demonstrated a significant association between Barthel Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Balance and Gait Evaluation, Timed “Up and Go”, Timed Test of Money Counting, Grip-Strength and Williams Board Test, and death as well as nursing home placement. Barthel-ADL were significantly correlated with hospital admission. In a logistic regression analysis, Barthel-ADL were independent predictors for death; Barthel-ADL, Timed “Up and Go”, Timed Test of Money Counting, and Williams Board Test were independent predictors for nursing home placement. No independent predictor was found for hospital admission. It is concluded that self-report and performance-based measures of functional capabilities are useful instruments to identify patients at risk for nursing home placement and death. Factors contributing to hospital admissions are other than those measured by the applied tests.

The early assessment of prevalent disability and functional decline is of increasing importance for prevention issues and for the evaluation of change in clinical studies. The assessment of common daily tasks and resulting disability is essential for a complete impression of a patient's capabilities. There are plenty of instruments that cover basic and instrumental activities of daily living by assessing the person's dependence at a specific functional task. However, the early stages of everyday life limitations and functional decline are usually not being captured. In this article we have examined psychometric properties of the German adaptation of the abbreviated "late life function and disability instrument", a promising tool that is capable of capturing early aspects of functional decline and disability.Older Caucasian men and women (Median=82 years) with a wide range of functional status (Short Physical Performance Battery: Median=6, Min.=0, Max.=12) completed the abbreviated version of the LLFDI once (n=173). A subgroup was assessed twice to examine interrater (n=13) and intrarater (n=10) reliability. Cognitive and functional status was assessed at baseline.Internal consistency (Cronbach's ) was acceptable for the personal role and social role of the frequency items of the disability component (0.55 to 0.62) and very good for all other parts of the instrument (0.78 to 0.89) without a significant difference when compared for overall cognitive performance or executive function. Test-retest reliability was very good (0.81 to 0.96) and interrater reliability was acceptable to very good (0.62 to 0.96) with only acceptable results for the limitation items of the disability component. The total scores of the two components did not demonstrate significant floor or ceiling effects and the interview lasted on average 17 minutes (range 8 to 35 min).The German adaptation of the abbreviated version of the "Late Life Function and Disability Instrument" has minimal ceiling and floor effects, acceptable to good internal consistency and interrater reliability, and very good test-retest reliability. Hence, it constitutes an excellent alternative to common self-rating instruments for the assessment of functional capacities in everyday activities.

Surgical treatment, discharge planning and rehabilitation procedures are rarely based upon defined assessment procedures. It might therefore be useful to develop simple and reliable screening tools to identify patients for early discharge, intensified rehabilitation and limited treatment.234 patients were initially contacted. From these 217 gave informed consent. The reported study included the 134 home dwelling elderly. All patients could be contacted or died after six month. Thus,data from more than 90% could be used for the analysis. The six month mortality was 10%. A population based cohort of elderly patients referred to five local hospitals was tested. Mortality, institutionalisation and mobility were defined as major outcome criteria. Only information that was available during the first week of treatment was used in the model. Predictors expressed as odd ratios (OR) were calculated using logistic regression with variable selection.The most important predictors for institutionalisation were age, inability to eat without assistance, postoperative night time confusion, stroke history, cognitive deficit and fear of falling. Outdoor mobility was strongly associated to the preoperative ADL performance measured as the Barthel-Index, history of malignancy and fear of falling. Six month mortality was associated with male sex, the Barthel-Index and fear of falling.It seems feasible to improve postoperative resource allocation by predictor led stratification. This need to be tested in intervention trials under the specific condition of the German health care system.

Most geriatric assessment instruments have been developed in the English language. Translated versions might differ in their psychometric properties. We analyzed the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of a German instrument for multidimensional geriatric assessment that was based on a newly developed English version. A group of 100 over 75-year-old community-dwelling persons (mean age 83.0 years, 81% women) in Hamburg (n = 26) and Ulm (n = 51), Germany, and Berne (n = 23), Switzerland was interviewed twice by the same trained interviewers with a one week interval. We administered questions on general health, chronic disorders, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, nutrition, falls, pain, the social support/network and preventive care measures. In addition, the Functional Status Questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, the Visual Function Questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Cohen's kappa was good to excellent (0.64or = kappaor = 0.89) with only three exceptions (pain questions, kappa = 0.53; questions on preventive care services, kappa = 0.51; and one of the questions on recent falls, kappa = 0.44). Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) was good to excellent for all domains (0.76or = alphaor = 0.95). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the German version of this multidimensional geriatric assessment instrument. Adapted versions of this instrument can be used for different purposes, e.g., preventive home visits, outpatient geriatric assessments or epidemiological studies in older persons.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment was developed in the Anglo-American countries as a diagnostic process to better understand the effects of diseases and interactions of multiple chronic conditions. To standardize the use of assessment instruments, a working group of the two German geriatric societies has elaborated recommendations. As the first step, an expanded version of the screening according to Lachs should be used, followed by performing the Barthel-ADL, the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Geriatric Depression Scale, the 'Timed Up and Go' and the (Semi-) Tandem Stance. The expanded version of the screening of Lachs is helpful for targeting patients and for placement; the others are not useful for that purpose. No instrument satisfactorily fulfills all test criteria, which include validity, reliability, sensitivity, practicability and repeatability, and, in part, these dimensions are not investigated at all. All test instruments are diagnostic tools for functional status and capabilities but do not give information about resource needs. No instrument covers the new concept of ICIDH completely.

to examine mortality, mobility, pain, institutionalization rates six month after hip fractures.observational study, non-selected consecutive patients, time-set protocol.urban area (population n = 116,5000), five hospitals.hip fracture patients (n = 214), age 65 + years (mean 82.4 years).age, gender, prefracture status, operative procedures, complications, comorbidity, cognition (MMSE), depression (GDS), fear of falling, ADL (Barthel) and mobility and pain status (SAHFE protocol).the incidence for this age group was 636.9/100,000, 31.8% were institutionalized elderly. 84% of the patients were female. Pre-existing comorbidity showed a high prevalence of neurodegenerative (cognitive deficits 53. 6%, Parkinson's disease/syndrome 11.2%) and cerebrovascular diseases (16.8%). Six month postfracture, the mortality was 17.6%. From those surviving 76.2% did walk indoors, 58.5% did also walk outdoors. Independent to dress were 54.6%. Severe pain was reported by 10.2%, whereas 36.9% described no pain. The institutionalization rate at six month was 19.0%.the study showed considerable mortality, a significant loss in function and social disintegration. Considerable differences were observed for subgroups of patients. Future treatment should focus on risk stratification and include postdischarge training programs. Moreover, preventive strategies should be implemented for high risk groups, such as ambulating patients with a history of stroke. Parkinson's disease and syndrome, dementia and nursing home residents.

The purpose of this prospective study was to measure patients’ ability to open a purse, take out money, and count it, in order to identify persons in need of increased health care. The study population consisted of 183 patients (mean age 78.9; range: 66-95) in two settings: 78 consecutively admitted geriatric hospital patients who could return home, and 105 community-dwelling patients aged 70 years or older. None was completely dependent on others, nor severely demented. Time for task performance was measured. Further assessment included the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE), Barthel index of ADL, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), socioeconomic status, grip strength, Williams board test, and medication profile. The Timed Test of Money Counting (TTMC) was reliable (interrater and intrarater), and showed construct and concurrent validity with other measures of physical function. There was a strong correlation (p

The transition team has its place in pre- and postdischarge nursing and therapeutic care, on the basis of a geriatric assessment. Core members of the team are, in the sequence of the scheduled performance in-hospital, nurse, occupational therapist, physiotherapist and social worker, supplemented by a team physician. Two-thirds of all treatments were in the hospital, one-third in an outpatient setting up to 4 weeks after discharge. Cooperation with outpatient services has been good.

In this ongoing randomized controlled trial the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary team implementing hospital-based comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and home intervention is being studied. All patients admitted from home showing functional decline with impairment of any basic activity of daily living are randomly assigned to one of the following courses of treatment: CGA with in-hospital and post discharge management by a home intervention team (HIT), where necessary (group 1): CGA with recommendations and usual care at home (group 2); or usual hospital and home care (group 3). The HIT consists of 3 nurses, 1 geriatrician, 1 physiotherapist, 1 occupational therapist, and 1 social worker. 540 patients will be recruited for the trial, which will assess the effects of GEM-HIT on the following outcomes: health status, functional status, survival, hospital readmission, nursing home placement and costs. The purpose of the GEM-HIT trial is to answer many of the current questions concerning treatment and health care delivery for frail older persons under the specific conditions found in Germany. The large sample size and the broad range of diagnoses included in the study will allow the evaluation of effects of GEM-HIT for subgroups and may help to identify the most effective assessment tools for use within our particular context.

The value of a diagnostic home visit as part of hospital-based geriatric assessment was examined in a prospective study. 141 subjects admitted from home to the geriatric hospital and showing functional decline with risk of nursing home placement underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment and a diagnostic home visit. In 19.1% of the patients, the diagnostic visit resulted in a change of time, and in 14.9% in a change of location of discharge. Up to seven problems were newly discovered (mean 2.1). To maintain independence up to six technical aids were prescribed (mean 2.3). The most common recommendations were related to safety (59.2% of all cases). In 89.3% the diagnostic home visit was judged necessary by the home intervention team. A follow-up visit after 3 months revealed that about 80% of all recommendations were implemented and approximately the same amount of technical aids were still used. The diagnostic home visit allows individual prescription of technical aids, when necessary. It contributes meaningful information to the geriatric assessment process and helps to achieve successful in-hospital therapy and discharge planning. It can be recommended especially for elderly patients at risk for losing their independence.

This work presents preliminary recommendations for a three-step geriatric assessment approach developed by a newly created working group consisting of members from nine geriatric departments in Germany and Switzerland. The recommendations were based on a literature review, expert consultation, and a consensus meeting. As part of this effort, instruments and guidelines for selected geriatric assessment instruments were translated and will be tested in German language. Further research is planned for refining the recommended method. Currently, these recommendations might help to stimulate the spread of geriatric assessment method in German-speaking areas and facilitate joint research projects among geriatric institutions.

To evaluate functional disabilities in elderly patients, geriatric assessment was performed in one general practice. Excluded from the study were patients with severe dementia and dependence. 178 patients were asked to participate and 144 accepted (mean age 78.7 +/- 5.8 years; number of diagnoses 5.2 +/- 2.6; f = 95, m = 49). Mini-mental-status examination showed moderately but significantly lower (p0.05) cognitive capacity in the age groups of 80-84 years (n = 37, 24.56 +/- 4.90 points) and of 85 years and older (n = 30, 25.14 +/- 3.11 points), but not in the group of 75-79 years (n = 46, 26.70 +/- 3.90 points) compared to the group of 70-74 years (n = 31, 27.65 +/- 2.59 points). Neither the Geriatric Depression Scale nor the Barthel-Index (activities of daily living) showed significant differences between the age groups. The score of the instrumental activities of daily living (Lawton Index) was significantly lower (p0.05) in the age group 85 years and older (4.1 +/- 2.5 points) compared to the age group of 70-74 years (6.1 +/- 2.4 points). Grip strength was significantly reduced (p0.01) in the age group 85 years and older as well as motility and balance scores (Tinetti test; p0.05) compared to the group of 70-74 years (43.21 +/- 16.27 kp and 64.87 +/- 19.81 kp, resp., 19.3 +/- 6.6 and 23.1 +/- 5.9 points). No correlation was found between the results of functional assessment and number of contacts with the general practitioner in the past year, number of prescribed drugs and number of diagnoses except for the depression test. There was a significant correlation between test score, number of contacts, and number of diagnoses (p0.05). Functional assessment resulted in new diagnoses of urinary incontinence in 7 patients and of mobility disorders in 17 patients. Cognitive impairment was suspected in 14 patients, depression in 2 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

To evaluate social aspects of elderly patients which are important for diagnosis and therapy within geriatric assessment, a questionnaire was developed and validated. Raters showed a high degree of agreement on the scale, which contains social contacts and support, activities, economic situation, and housing conditions (0.92-0.97; p0.05). Compared to the interrater reliability the test-retest reliability was somewhat lower (0.75), but also significant at the 5% level. The internal consistency showed high values between 0.72-0.89. In order to evaluate the validity of the screening test the answers of the patients were compared with the assessment of the therapeutic team. The team had information from a home visit, patients spouse, relatives, neighbors, community nurses and/or general practitioners. There was a significant relationship (p0.01) between therapeutic assessment and the scale (r = 0.51). Sensitivity, specificity, and total efficiency also attained sufficiently high values at a cut-off of 16/17 for the complete scale (max. 25 points). The test is easily and quickly performed; its acceptance is high. Social data relevant for treatment and discharge planning can thus be obtained and patients can be identified, for whom a home visit seems to be useful.