Search

Aim: To assess the possibilities of using comorbidity indices together with the GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) scale to assess the risk of hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome (ACS)., Materials and Methods: The registry study included 2,305 patients with ACS. The frequency of coronary angiography was 54.0%, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 26.9%. Hospital mortality with ACS was 4.8%, with myocardial infarction 9.4%. All patients underwent a comorbidity assessment according to the CIRS system (Cumulative Illness Rating Scale), according to the CCI (Charlson Comorbidity Index) and the CDS (Chronic Disease Score) scale, according to their own scale, which is based on the summation of 9 diseases (diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, stroke, arterial hypertension, obesity, peripheral atherosclerosis, thrombocytopenia, anemia, chronic kidney disease). All patients underwent a mortality risk assessment using the GRACE ACS Risk scale., Results: It was found that the CDS and CIRS indices are not associated with the risk of hospital mortality. With CCI3, the frequency of death outcomes increased from 4.1 to 6.1% (2=4.12, p=0.042). With an increase in the severity of comorbidity from minimal (no more than 1 disease) to severe (4 or more diseases) according to its own scale, hospital mortality increased from 1.2 to 7.4% (2=23.8, p0.0001). In contrast to other scales of comorbidity, our own model more efficiently estimates the hospital prognosis both in the conservative treatment group (2=8.0, p=0.018) and in the PCI group (2=28.5, p=0.00001). It was in the PCI subgroup that the comorbidity factors included in their own model made it possible to increase the area under the ROC curve of the GRACE scale from 0.80 (0.740.87) to 0.90 (0.850.95)., Conclusion: CCI and its own comorbidity model, but not CDS and CIRS, are associated with the risk of hospital mortality. The model for assessing comorbidity on a 9-point scale, but not CCI, CDS and CIRS, can significantly improve the predictive value of the GRACE scale.

Aim        To study gender aspects of comorbidity in evaluating the risk of in-hospital death for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Material and methods        The presented results are based on data of two ACS registries, the city of Sochi and RECORD-3. 986 patients were included into this analysis by two additional criteria, age <70 years and PCI. 80% of the sample were men. Analysis of comorbidity severity was performed for all patients and included 9 indexes: type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, anemia, stroke, arterial hypertension, obesity, and peripheral atherosclerosis. Group 1 (minimum comorbidity) consisted of patients with not more than one disease (n=367); group 2 (moderate comorbidity) consisted of patients with 2 or 3 diseases (n=499), and group 3 (pronounced comorbidity) consisted of patients with 4 or more diseases (n=120). In-hospital mortality was 2.7 % (n=27).Results   Significant data on the effect of comorbidity on the in-hospital prognosis were obtained only for men of the compared groups: 0.6, 1.8, and 8.8 %, respectively (χ2=21.6; р<0.0001). At the same time, among 44 women with minimum comorbidity, there were no cases of in-hospital death, and the presence of moderate (n=110) and pronounced comorbidity (n=40) was associated with a similar death rate (7.3 and 7.5 %, respectively). Noteworthy, in moderate comorbidity, the female gender was associated with a 4-fold increase in the risk of in-hospital death (odd ratio, OR 4.3 at 95 % confidence interval, CI from 1.5 to 12.1; р=0.003). In addition, both in men and women with minimum comorbidity, even a high risk by the GRACE scale (score ≥140) was not associated with increased in-hospital mortality, which was minimal (0 for women and 1 % for men). At the same time, in the patient subgroup with moderate and pronounced comorbidity, a GRACE score ≥140 resulted in a 6-fold increase in the risk of in-hospital death for men (OR 6.0 at 95 % CI from 1.7 to 21.9; р=0.002) and a 16-fold increase for women (OR 16.2 at 95 % CI from 2.0 to 130.4; р=0.0006).Conclusion            This study identified gender-related features in predicting the risk of in-hospital death for ACS patients with comorbidities after PCI, which warrants reconsideration of existing approaches to risk stratification.

On April 9, 2018, the national advisory board "Improvement of outcomes in patients with recent ACS: the place of PCSK9 inhibitors" was held in Moscow. Leading Russian experts in the field of atherosclerosis and lipid-lowering treatment attended the board. The purpose of the Board was to determine the place of PCSK9 inhibitors in the improvement of outcomes in patients with recent (less than 1 year) acute coronary syndrome (ACS). During the Board, three major aspects of lipid-lowering treatment were discussed: 1) issues in reaching the target levels of LDL cholesterol in real clinical practice among patients with recent ACS; 2) the results of ODYSSEY OUTCOMES study and their role in the improvement of outcomes in patients with recent ACS; 3) treatment with PCSK9 inhibitors in the management of patients with recent (less than 1 year) ACS in everyday clinical practice, the role of lipid centers.

The present article reviews the issues of medical healthcare provision for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the Russian Federation from the perspective of benefits of pharmacoinvasive management for these patients. A brief analysis of clinical trials, promoting and defining pharmacoinvasive management as a preferred therapy that should be implemented in the Federal Health Care Program for ACS, is presented. The data of the STREAM study reported similar results in comparison with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in immediate and long-term prognosis in patients with ST-elevation ACS after the initiation of thrombolytic therapy (TLT) with tenecteplase in the early pre-hospital period (< 3 hours from the onset of myocardial infarction).

Background: Complete following existing guidelines for management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is known to be associated with better outcomes. Partly this is explained by lesser adherence to recommendations in high risk patients. Aim of our study was to assess relationship between degree of following current guidelines and in hospital outcomes independently from initial assessment of risk., Methods: Each key recommendation from guidelines issued between 2008 and 2011 (13 for STE ACS, 12 for NSTE ACS) was given weight of 1. Sum of these units constituted index of guideline adherence (IGA). IGA was retrospectively calculated for 1656 patients included in Russian independent ACS registry RECORD-2 (7 hospitals, duration 04.2009 to 04.2011). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to quartiles of IGA distribution: 1) low adherence group (quartiles I-II); 2) high adherence group (quartiles III-IV)., Results: In low adherence compared with high adherence group there were significantly more patients more or equal 65 years (=0.0007), with chronic heart failure [CHF] (<0.0001), previous stroke (<0.0001), atrial fibrillation [AF] (=0.0002), Killip class more or equal II (=0.0065), high risk of death by GRACE score (=0.035). Inhospital mortality was 9.3 and 2.4% in low and high adherence group, respectively (p<0.0001). The following independent predictors of inhospital death were identified: IGA quartiles I-II (odds ratio [OR] 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.3-7.1; <0.0001), high GRACE score (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.8-6.0; <0.0001), admission systolic BP less or equal 100 mm Hg (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.8-5.4; <0.0001), admission serum glucose more or equal 8 mmol/l (OR 2.9; 95% CI 1.8-4.7; <0.0001), age more or equal 65 years (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.3-4.0; =0.005), ST elevation more or equal 1 mm on first ECG (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.5; =0.013). From groups with low and high adherence to guidelines we selected pairs of patients (n=588) with similar (or close) age, type of ACS, GRACE score, Killip class, presence of other important risk factors (CHF, AF, previous stroke), and formed 2 equal subgroups without significant differences in important demographic, anamnestic, clinical and laboratory data. Hospital mortality was 7.8 and 2.7% in low and high adherence subgroup, respectively (p<0.0001)., Conclusions: In RECORD-2 ACS registry low adherence to guidelines was more frequent among high risk patients and was independent predictor of inhospital death. Association between degree of guidelines adherence and outcomes persisted after equalizing groups by some factors of risk of mortality.

Aim: To assess incidence and severity of renal dysfunction as well as its prognostic value in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multifocal atherosclerosis (MFA)., Material and Methods: We enrolled in this study 529 patients with STEMI in whom we estimated creatinine clearance rate (eGFR) and glomerular filtration rate (eCrCl) using Cockcroft-Gault equation and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, respectively. Duplex ultrasonography of lower extremity and extracranial arteries was performed in 423 patients on day 5-10 of hospitalization. Signs of MFA were found in 95% of patients. Hospital mortality was 10.9%. One year survival of 397 patients was assessed by the telephone contacts. Thirty nine patients (9.8%) died., Results: GFR in 35.5% of patients was 30-60, and in 4.9% - less than 30 ml/min/1.73 m2. At the same time 29.5% of patients had CCr 30 - 60, and 3.0% - less than 30 ml/min. Progressive decreases of eCCr and eGFR were observed in patients with incipient MFA (stenosis <30%); relationship between MFA and eGRF was more close. Presence of renal dysfunction in patients with STEACS and MFA was associated elevation of both hospital and 1 year mortality., Conclusion: Any manifestation of peripheral atherosclerosis and impairment of renal function should be considered as independent predictors of cardiovascular events in patients after STEMI.

At present reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation (STE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is carried out in majority of countries not more than in 70% of cases. We analyzed predictors of non-fulfillment of reperfusion therapy in patients with STEACS included into ACS registry conducted in the Kemerovo cardiological dispensary. Reperfusion therapy was not carried out in 154 patients with STEACS (36.2%). Main predictors of non-fulfillment of reperfusion were age older than 75 years (odds ratio [OR] 47.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.47-118.21), admission later than in 12 hours after onset of disease (OR 4.29, 95%CI 1.52-12.13), history of myocardial infarction (OR 2.68, 95%CI 1.11-6.48). Thus there are factors including subjective ones which preclude full-fledged use of contemporary recommendations on the management of patients with STEACS.