Search

Purpose: East Asian individuals have a lower risk of thromboembolic events while potentially carrying a higher risk of bleeding events compared with non-Asian individuals. The aim of the present analysis was to investigate the effectiveness and safety of the de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy compared with standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in East Asian patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing de-escalation with DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were retrieved from electronic databases from their inception until March 2022. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), ischemic events, major bleeding, minor bleeding, and any bleeding. Subgroup analyses based on treatment strategy were conducted. Statistical analysis was performed by using Review Manager version 5.4., Findings: Eight randomized controlled trials from 539 potentially relevant publications with a total of 15,744 East Asian patients were included. Pooled data from these studies found a significantly lower MACE (0.82; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98) and major bleeding event (0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.82) in de-escalation than standard-DAPT without heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis was divided into DAPT followed by P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy and a reducing dose of P2Y 12 inhibitors. DAPT followed by P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy had a 48% lower incidence of major bleeding events than standard DAPT (0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-1.00); there was no significant difference in major bleeding (0.99; 95% CI, 0.55-1.76) between the reducing dose of P2Y 12 inhibitors and standard DAPT., Implications: De-escalation is a promising and potentially optimal antiplatelet therapy for patients from East Asia with PCI. DAPT followed by P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy might be a safer and equally effective approach compared with standard DAPT in East Asian patients with PCI. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42022319983., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Data available for pharmacokinetics (PK)/pharmacodynamics (PD) of ticagrelor and significant endogenous/exogenous factors or biomarkers related to bleeding events in both healthy and clinical patients are limited., Objective: Based on PK and PD data from multicenter healthy subjects and patients, we aimed to establish an integrated approach towards population PK (pop PK) and the PD model of ticagrelor., Methods: This study was conducted as a multicenter, prospective clinical registration study involving both healthy subjects and clinical patients. The integrated Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) models were characterized based on PK/PD [ticagrelor concentration, aggregation baseline (BASE), P2Y12 response unit (PRU) and inhibition rate (INHIBIT)] data from 175 healthy volunteers. The model was corrected by sparse PD (BASE, PRU and INHIBIT) data from 208 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The correlations between PD biomarkers and clinically relevant bleedings in 1 year were explored., Results: A one-compartment, linear model with first-order absorption was adopted as PK model. Food status (FOOD) and body weight (WT) significantly influenced clearance and improved the fitting degree of the PK model, while SEX was selected as the covariates of the PD model. For patients taking ticagrelor 90 mg, the peak value [mean (95% CI)] of PRU was 355.15 (344.24-366.06) and the trough value was 3.64 (3.14-4.15). The PRU mean parameters were basically within the expected range (80-200) of the literature suggestions., Conclusion: A fixed dose of ticagrelor, without adjusting the dosing regimen other than covariates of FOOD/WT/SEX, could be used in patients with acute coronary syndromes, and the standard regimen could be used in Chinese patients from the perspective of exposure., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Study Objective: East Asians have a higher risk of bleeding than Europeans when treated with ticagrelor. This study aimed to explore genetic indicators related to the high bleeding propensity in East Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) using ticagrelor., Design: A multicenter prospective cohort study., Setting: Four sub center hospitals participating the study., Patients: Between March 2018 and July 2021, 208 patients with ACS were administered ticagrelor and underwent genetic testing., Invertention: Patients were enrolled and followed up for bleeding events for 12 months. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were detected using whole-exome sequencing. SNPs significantly associated with cumulative bleeding events within 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups were selected (p < 0.01). Among these, SNPs showing a difference of ≥2 fold in their distribution frequency among East Asians and Europeans were selected., Measurements and Main Results: Among all patients, 96.60% received ticagrelor plus aspirin or cilostazol, and 42.3% suffered from bleeding events during 12-month follow-up. Furthermore, 22 SNPs of 15 genes were found to have a significant association with cumulative bleeding events within 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-ups. Among these SNPs, FIG4 rs2295837 (A>T) variant had the strongest association with bleeding events within 1 month (p = 1.28 × 10 -4 ), with an increased risk of bleeding in T allele carriers (odds ratio [OR]: 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.68-5.63). PROK2 rs3796224 (C>T) variant was most strongly associated with cumulative bleeding events within 6 months (p = 4.57 × 10 -4 ) with an increased risk of bleeding in T allele carriers (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.20-3.89). Moreover, HRNR rs6662450 (C>T) variant showed the strongest relation with cumulative bleeding events within 12 months (p = 4.86 × 10 -4 ) with a reduced risk of bleeding in T allele carriers (OR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.24-0.95)., Conclusion: Fifteen genes, including PROK2, HRNR, and FIG4, were potential biomarkers of high bleeding propensity in East Asian patients with ACS using ticagrelor., (© 2022 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Aim: This meta-analysis was carried out to explore if a personalized antiplatelet strategy based on genotyping is superior to conventional therapy., Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched from the inception of each database to 5 May 2020. Studies reporting endpoints in genotype-guided treatment group and conventional treatment group were included. The endpoint results were presented as the risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval (CI)., Results: A total of 10 561 patients from 16 studies (eight randomized controlled trials [RCT] and eight cohort studies) were included in the meta-analysis. The rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), stent thrombosis and myocardial infarction (MI) were significantly lower in the genotype-guided group than in the conventional treatment group (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.73, P < .0001; RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.67, P = .0005; RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, P < .00001, respectively). A significant difference was found between the two groups in major bleeding (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.98, P = .04), which was not robust after sensitivity analysis., Conclusion: Genotype-guided antiplatelet treatment could decrease the risk of MACE, stent thrombosis and MI in patients with coronary artery disease or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, without increasing the risk of bleeding over a long follow-up period. The decreased risk of efficacy outcomes was more obvious in cohort studies. Well-organized RCTs and clinical trials are required to verify the benefit of genotype-guided therapy., (© 2020 British Pharmacological Society.)

Background As reports on the influence of cigarette smoking, an important cardiovascular risk factor, on platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of platelet ADP -P2Y12 receptor inhibitors influenced by smoking status. Methods and Results PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE , Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception until June 2018. Among the 5076 citations retrieved, 22 studies, including 163 011 patients with or without percutaneous coronary intervention, were included for meta-analysis. Compared with nonsmokers within the first year of follow-up, the reductions of stroke and major adverse cardiovascular event rate were 18% ( P=0.008) and 26% ( P=0.02), respectively. A 20% reduction in stroke ( P=0.02) and a 34% reduction in major adverse cardiovascular event ( P=0.0001) rates were observed in smoking patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. No significant difference was observed in clinical outcome rates among prasugrel, ticagrelor, and clopidogrel in different smoking status. No significant difference was found in myocardial infarction and bleeding event incidence between current smokers and nonsmokers. Conclusions We concluded that current smokers had a lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events and stroke events than did nonsmokers, particularly in the early period (1 year) and among patients without percutaneous coronary intervention. However, because of the lack of original adjusted data, smoker's paradox still needs to consider the impact of age and other covariates. Thus, a differential risk-benefit evaluation should be considered, according to different smoking status, patient conditions, and therapy time points.

Cigarette smoking is an important cardiovascular risk factor, causing morbidity and mortality. There are many original studies on the impact of smoking, but its influence on platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors lack consistency. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of already existing data/studies to further explore this issue. PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2018. Studies investigating the residual platelet reactivity categorized by smoking status and patients treated with platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors qualified the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) value measured by VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, compared with different smoking status in ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors treatment groups. Secondary outcome was post-treatment with 5 μmol/L ADP-inhibition of platelet aggregation (ADP-IPA) measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA). Of the 4954 citations retrieved, 12 studies involving 16 296 patients with acute coronary syndrome and/or stent deployment using platelet ADP-P2Y12 receptor inhibitors were included for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that PRU values of current smokers were 25.70 lower than nonsmokers (95% CI −38.81 to −12.60, p = 0.0001), getting better effects of antiplatelet treatment. In the smoking extent subgroup analysis, patients smoking >10 cigarettes/day shown about 46.49 lower of PRU values than patients smoking <10 cigarettes/day (p < 0.00001). Racial subgroup analyses found that smokers had increased platelet inhibition in the Caucasian population. Further, pooled analysis of ADP-IPA values for 1658 patients from five studies showed a significantly lower residual platelet reactivity in current smokers compared to that in nonsmokers (MD = −4.19; 95% CI −6.55 to −1.83; p = 0.0005). This systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that smokers have increased platelet inhibition and lower aggregation in response to clopidogrel than nonsmokers. These residual platelet reactivity observations may help to explain differential clinical outcomes in smokers vs. nonsmokers in large scale clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]