1. Hyper‐CVAD versus dose‐adjusted EPOCH as initial treatment for adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
- Author
-
Zarling, Lucas C., Stevenson, Philip A., Soma, Lorinda A., Martino, Christen H., Percival, Mary‐Elizabeth M., Halpern, Anna B., Ghiuzeli, Cristina M., Becker, Pamela S., Oehler, Vivian G., Cooper, Jason P., Orozco, Johnnie J., Hendrie, Paul C., Walter, Roland B., Estey, Elihu H., and Cassaday, Ryan D.
- Subjects
LYMPHOBLASTIC leukemia ,ACUTE leukemia ,RESOURCE-limited settings ,CANCER remission ,ERYTHROCYTES - Abstract
Objectives: We recently performed a single‐arm phase II trial of DA‐EPOCH in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We sought to compare these results to those with standard Hyper‐CVAD. Methods: We created a retrospective matched cohort of patients who received Hyper‐CVAD (n = 69) at our center and otherwise met eligibility criteria for the DA‐EPOCH trial (n = 53). Results: Our outcomes support the use of Hyper‐CVAD over DA‐EPOCH in Ph− disease for both overall survival (OS; HR 0.18, p =.004) and event‐free survival (EFS; HR 0.51, p =.06). In contrast, outcomes were similar in Ph+ disease (OS HR 0.97, p =.96; EFS HR 0.65, p =.21). Rates of morphologic remission and measurable residual‐disease negativity were similar between the regimens. Hyper‐CVAD was associated with significantly more febrile neutropenia (OR 1.9, p =.03) and a greater incidence of Grade 4 or 5 adverse events (20% vs. 6%). Average transfusions per cycle of both red blood cells (p <.001) and platelets (p <.001) were five‐fold higher with Hyper‐CVAD. Conclusions: Our findings support continued use of Hyper‐CVAD for Ph− ALL but suggest that DA‐EPOCH may be a reasonable alternative for Ph+ ALL. These data also highlight a potential role for DA‐EPOCH in resource‐limited settings or when more intense therapy is not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF