Search

Objectives: Dysregulation of BCL‐2 family members has been reported in acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), with various BH3‐dependencies of the leukemic clone. We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with relapsed/refractory B or T ALL, with ven‐chemotherapy or ven‐navitoclax combinations, to assess efficacy and safety. Methods: Seventeen patients were included in the analysis, median age was 32 years, with 6 B‐ALL and 11 T‐ALL patients. Nine patients received venetoclax combined with chemotherapy, and 13 patients received venetoclax in combination with navitoclax, vincristine and asparaginase, of which 5 were already exposed to venetoclax in previous lines. Results: ORR was 55% and 46% among the ven‐chemotherapy and the ven‐navitoclax‐chemotherapy, respectively. Most of the responders proceeded to an allogenic bone marrow transplant in both cohorts. The most common adverse effects of the ven‐navitoclax combination were infectious complications and hepatotoxicity. Conclusions: Our data demonstrated the possible efficacy of ven‐chemotherapy and ven‐navitoclax in r/r ALL with moderate toxicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: The use of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo‐HCT) with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide prophylaxis is gaining traction in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). METHODS: The Acute Leukemia Working Party/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry was used to evaluate the outcomes of adult patients with ALL who underwent haplo‐HCT during 2011 through 2015 and compared them with the outcomes of those who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018. RESULTS: The analysis consisted of 195 patients, including 79 who underwent transplantation during 2011 through 2015 and 116 who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018. Overall, the 2‐year leukemia‐free survival and relapse incidence rates were 56.5% and 21%, respectively. The 100‐day incidence of grade 2 through 4 acute graft‐vs‐host disease (GVHD) was 34.5%. The rates of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS) were 22.5% and 64.7%, respectively. Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 experienced improved rates of leukemia‐free survival (64.9% vs 47.3%; P =.019) and OS (75.5% vs 53.5%; P =.006). Patients who underwent transplantation during 2016 through 2018 developed more grade 2 through 4 acute GVHD (42% vs 26.4%; P =.047). The incidence of relapse, GVHD‐free/relapse‐free survival, grade 3 and 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD did not differ significantly between groups. In multivariate analysis, more recently transplanted patients had a significantly reduced risk of NRM (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22‐0.89; P =.022) and improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26‐0.86; P =.014). A comparable analysis of patients who had acute myeloid leukemia during the same timeframes did not reveal any statistically significant differences in any outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of adult patients with ALL who receive posttransplant cyclophosphamide has improved over time, with an impressive 2‐year OS of 75% and, most recently, an NRM rate of only 17%. In patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia who undergo haploidentical transplantation with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide prophylaxis, significant improvements in leukemia‐free survival and survival are observed in more recently transplanted patients. A nonrelapse mortality rate of 17% is reported in recently transplanted patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia who receive posttransplantation cyclophosphamide prophylaxis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]