Search

The article explores Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16) (p13;q22) has distinct clinicopathologic features, including myelomonocytic leukemic cells, abnormal bone marrow eosinophils, and a relatively favorable prognosis.1,2 Most cases are classified as AML M4 with abnormal eosinophils (M4Eo) in the French-AmericanBritish (FAB) classification.

A 69-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with unresectable papillary thyroid cancer was referred to our hospital. We initially treated her with sorafenib, but she subsequently developed erythema multiforme, which was suspected to be a drug rush due to sorafenib; therefore, sorafenib was discontinued. At the time of discontinuation, immature blast cells were detected in her peripheral blood. Approximately two weeks later, her skin rash improved substantially, but the proportion of blasts in the peripheral blood increased. We performed a bone marrow examination, and she was diagnosed with FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia. FLT3-ITD expression is found in 20–25% of AML and is a known independent poor prognostic factor. To overcome the poor prognosis associated with FLT3-ITD, molecular drugs targeting FLT3-ITD are attracting much attention. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, also has an effect on FLT3-ITD. Although primary disease flares after tyrosine kinase inhibitor discontinuation have been reported, this is the first report to describe discontinuation of sorafenib treatment as a potential trigger of FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia in papillary thyroid cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

As an uncommon but nonrandom translocation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) t(5;11)(q31;q23) results in fusion between KMT2A at 11q23 and ARHGAP26 at 5q31. The 5q31 region has another KMT2A partner, AFF4 , which was identified in acute lymphoblastic leukemia harboring ins(5;11)(q31;q13q23). We report here a 65-year-old woman with AML M5b. G-banding and spectral karyotyping demonstrated 46,XX,t(5;11)(q31;q23.3). Fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed not only separated 5′ and 3′ KMT2A signals but a faint 5′ KMT2A signal. Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR), using a KMT2A sense primer and ARHGAP26 antisense primer, detected no band whereas RT–PCR with a AFF4 antisense primer revealed an amplified band. However, sequence analysis unexpectedly disclosed that KMT2A exon 6 was connected with MLLT10 exons 15 to 18. This may be due to cross-hybridization between MLLT10 exon 18 and AFF4 antisense primer derived from AFF4 exon 10 since both exons had eight identical bases (AAGCAGCT). The MLLT10 gene is located at 10p12.31; a faint 5′ KMT2A signal was probably present at this locus. These findings indicate that in AML the 5′ KMT2A fragment containing exons 1 to 6 may be cryptically inserted into MLLT10 intron 14 when a reciprocal translocation t(5;11)(q31;q23.3) involving KMT2A occurred. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]