Search

Background: Acute myocardial ischemia has several characteristic ECG findings, including clinically detectable ST-segment deviations. However, the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis based on ST-segment changes are low. Furthermore, ST-segment deviations have been shown to be transient and spontaneously recover without any indication the ischemic event has subsided.Objective: Assess the transient recovery of ST-segment deviations on remote recording electrodes during a partial occlusion cardiac stress test and compare them to intramyocardial ST-segment deviations.Methods: We used a previously validated porcine experimental model of acute myocardial ischemia with controllable ischemic load and simultaneous electrical measurements within the heart wall, on the epicardial surface, and on the torso surface. Simulated cardiac stress tests were induced by occluding a coronary artery while simultaneously pacing rapidly or infusing dobutamine to stimulate cardiac function. Postexperimental imaging created anatomical models for data visualization and quantification. Markers of ischemia were identified as deviations in the potentials measured at 40% of the ST-segment. Intramural cardiac conduction speed was also determined using the inverse gradient method. We assessed changes in intramyocardial ischemic volume proportion, conduction speed, clinical presence of ischemia on remote recording arrays, and regional changes to intramyocardial ischemia. We defined the peak deviation response time as the time interval after onset of ischemia at which maximum ST-segment deviation was achieved, and ST-recovery time was the interval when ST deviation returned to below thresholded of ST elevation.Results: In both epicardial and torso recordings, the peak ST-segment deviation response time was 4.9±1.1 min and the ST-recovery time was approximately 7.9±2.5 min, both well before the termination of the ischemic stress. At peak response time, conduction speed was reduced by 50% and returned to near baseline at ST-recovery. The overall ischemic volume proportion initially increased, on average, to 37% at peak response time; however, it recovered to only 30% at the ST-recovery time. By contrast, the subepicardial region of the myocardial wall showed 40% ischemic volume at peak response time and recovered much more strongly to 25% as epicardial ST-segment deviations returned to baseline.Conclusion: Our data show that remote ischemic signal recovery correlates with a recovery of the subepicardial myocardium, whereas subendocardial ischemic development persists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Test the hypothesis that exercise and pharmacological cardiac stressors create different electrical ischemic signatures.Introduction: Current clinical stress tests for detecting ischemia lack sensitivity and specificity. One unexplored source of the poor detection is whether pharmacological stimulation and regulated exercise produce identical cardiac stress.Methods: We used a porcine model of acute myocardial ischemia in which animals were instrumented with transmural plunge-needle electrodes, an epicardial sock array, and torso arrays to simultaneously measure cardiac electrical signals within the heart wall, the epicardial surface, and the torso surface, respectively. Ischemic stress via simulated exercise and pharmacological stimulation were created with rapid electrical pacing and dobutamine infusion, respectively, and mimicked clinical stress tests of five 3-minute stages. Perfusion to the myocardium was regulated by a hydraulic occluder around the left anterior descending coronary artery. Ischemia was measured as deflections to the ST-segment on ECGs and electrograms.Results: Across eight experiments with 30 (14 simulated exercise and 16 dobutamine) ischemic interventions, the spatial correlations between exercise and pharmacological stress diverged at stage three or four during interventions (p<0.05). We found more detectable ST-segment changes on the epicardial surface during simulated exercise than with dobutamine (p<0.05). The intramyocardial ischemia formed during simulated exercise had larger ST40 potential gradient magnitudes (p<0.05).Conclusion: We found significant differences on the epicardium between cardiac stress types using our experimental model, which became more pronounced at the end stages of each test. A possible mechanism for these differences was the larger ST40 potential gradient magnitudes within the myocardium during exercise. The presence of microvascular dysfunction during exercise and its absence during dobutamine stress may explain these differences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]