Search

Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriales (ESBL-PE) are commonly treated with intravenous antibiotics. This study investigated whether oral antimicrobial therapy (OAT) is as effective as intravenous antimicrobial therapy (IVT) for acute pyelonephritis (APN) caused by ESBL-PE. A retrospective cohort of patients with APN caused by ESBL-PE was studied at a tertiary-care hospital from January 2014 through December 2016. The OAT group comprised patients treated with an appropriate oral antimicrobial agent following 7 days or less of IVT. The primary endpoint was treatment failure defined as clinical and/or microbiological failure. The secondary endpoint was length of hospital stay and recurrences of APN within 2 months and within 1 year. Propensity score matching and multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to minimize bias. Among 238 eligible cases, Escherichia coli (83.6%) was the most common pathogen. Sixty patients received OAT after a median of four days of appropriate IVT, and 178 patients completed treatment with IVT. Fluoroquinolones (58.3%) were the most commonly prescribed OAT, followed by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and amoxicillin-clavulanate. OAT was not associated with treatment failure (adjusted OR 0.66; 95% CI 0.18–2.44) and hospitalization length was shorter in the OAT group (6.2 days versus 10.7 days; P < 0.01). APN recurrence caused by ESBL-PE infection within 2 months was not associated with OAT (adjusted HR 0.56; 95% CI 0.16–2.00). OAT reduced hospital stay without adverse effects on treatment outcome. OAT could be safely applied as a carbapenem-saving option in treatment of APN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate factors for the recurrence of acute pyelonephritis (APN) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-PE), a retrospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary-care hospital from 2014 through 2016. Among 135 patients who had recovered from APN caused by ESBL-PE, the 1-year cumulative recurrence rates of APN caused by any pathogen or by ESBL-PE specifically were 35.6% and 22.1%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, infectious disease (ID) consultation was associated with decreased recurrence (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.24–0.96, P = 0.038 for recurrence caused by any pathogen; and 95% CI = 0.15–0.84, P = 0.019 for recurrence caused by ESBL-PE). History of APN within 1 year was a risk factor for recurrent APN caused by any pathogen (P = 0.011). Microbiological cure was a preventive factor for recurrent APN caused by ESBL-PE (P = 0.024). In conclusion, our data show that ID consultation protects against APN recurrence caused by ESBL-PE. • Acute pyelonephritis (APN) caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase–producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-PE) is increasing. • Data of the factors associated with APN recurrence caused by ESBL-PE were limited. • The 1-year cumulative recurrence rate of APN caused by ESBL-PE was 22.1%. • Infectious disease (ID) consultation was associated with decreased recurrence. • We should encourage physicians to refer patients with APN for ID consultation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]