Search

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of lactate vs. bicarbonate-buffered replacement fluids on electrolyte mass balance during isovolemic continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH). DESIGN: Randomized controlled study with double cross over. SETTING: Intensive care unit of a tertiary university hospital. Patients and participants: Eight patients with acute renal failure (ARF). INTERVENTIONS: Isovolemic CVVH (2L/hr of replacement fluid) was performed in random order with either bicarbonate or lactate-buffered replacement fluid delivered pre-filter. Measurements and RESULTS: Sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, and phosphate, were measured in each sample. There was a mass gain of sodium, which was similar under both conditions (bicarbonate: 23.3 ± 4.9 mmol/hr, lactate: 22.7 ± 3.5 mmol/hr). Mass chloride gains occurred with bicarbonate-buffered replacement fluid only (12.8 ± 5.3 mmol/hr), while there was an overall net loss of chloride with lactate fluids (− 2.5 ± 5.2 mmol/hr), resulting in a significant difference in chloride mass balance (p < 0.0001). Magnesium mass balance was negative with bicarbonate buffer only (− 0.6 ± 0.2 mmol/hr) and also differed significantly from that obtained with lactate fluids (− 0.1 ± 0.2 mmol/hr, p < 0.0001). Phosphate losses (bicarbonate: − 1.7 ± 0.7 mmol/hr, lactate: − 1.7 ± 0.5 mmol/hr) were equivalent with both buffers. Potassium mass balance was neutral. CONCLUSIONS: Mass balance during isovolemic CVVH is significantly affected by the type of replacement fluid administered pre-filter. Isovolemic CVVH is not isonatremic and the use of bicarbonate-buffered fluid results in a significant accumulation of chloride and a loss of magnesium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: To measure outflow and inflow hydraulic resistance in double-lumen catheters used for hemofiltration under standardized laboratory conditions. SETTING: ICU Laboratory of tertiary unit. METHODS: Heparinized spent red cells diluted in polygeline solution to a constant hematocrit of 32% at 37°C were pumped using a standard Prisma M60 circuit through several hemofiltration catheters. Blood pump speed was increased and decreased in steps of 30 mL/min (30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 mL/min) and catheter outflow and inflow pressures recorded and used to define the pressure flow relationship (line of hydraulic resistance) for each. RESULTS: Double-lumen catheters posed different resistances to outflow or inflow. Among the <15 cm long catheters, the 11.5 Fr Quinton-Mahurkar (0.56 mmHg/mL/min) catheter offered the least resistance to outflow, while the Medcomp 11.5 Fr catheter offered the least resistance to inflow (0.78 mmHg/mL/min). Among the >19 cm long catheters, the 13.5 Fr Vascath Niagara catheter showed the lowest blood flow resistance to both outflow (0.63 mmHg/mL/min) and inflow (0.83 mmHg/mL/min). Longer catheters did not pose statistically greater resistance to both outflow and inflow. Resistance to inflow was consistently greater than resistance to outflow (p = 0.003). Overall, the Prisma M60 blood circuit alone accounted for 40% of the total extracorporeal circuit blood flow resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Proprietary hemofiltration catheters have variable resistance to blood flow under standard ex-vivo conditions. This ex-vivo information might be useful to clinicians in guiding their choice of catheters for clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and AIMS: The prevention of filter clotting is an important goal in the management of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). Anticoagulation is the mainstay of such prevention. However, other strategies might prolong filter life without increasing the risk of bleeding. We tested the effectiveness of three strategies (use of flat plate configuration, heparin administration into the air chamber and use of a larger membrane surface) aimed at prolonging circuit life without increasing the dose of anticoagulation. METHODS: Thirty-one critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) managed with continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) were studied. Filters were randomized in a crossover design to three consecutive studies: (1) filtration with either hollow-fiber or flat-plate hemofilters, (2) administration of heparin dose pre-filter or divided into pre-filter and directly into the bubble trap chamber and (3) use of two different surface areas with Filtral 8 (surface area 0.75 m2) vs. Filtral 12 (surface area 1.30 m2) hemofilters. RESULTS: Mean circuit life for flat-plate and hollow-fiber hemofilters (cohort 1) was 14.7 ± 4.7 h and 17.1 ± 2.8 h respectively (NS). Mean circuit life for single heparin administration site vs. double site administration (cohort 2) was 17 ± 3.2 h and 18 ± 3.1 h respectively (NS). Mean circuit lifespan for 0.75 m2 and 1.30 m2 hemofilters was 16 ± 12.2 h and 15.7 ± 14.3 h respectively (NS) (cohort 3). Visible clot formation in the bubble trap chamber was a frequent cause of circuit failure. CONCLUSION: Neither flat plate membrane configuration nor increasing membrane surface area, nor heparin administration in the air chamber prolong circuit life during CVVH. The bubble trap chamber is a frequent site of circuit clotting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Achieving “adequacy of dialysis” includes the maintenance of normal serum ionized calcium concentrations and is an important therapeutic goal in the treatment of acute renal failure (ARF). It is unknown whether this goal is best achieved with intermittent or continuous renal replacement therapy. METHODS: We compared the effects of continuous veno–venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) on serum ionized calcium concentrations using daily morning blood tests in 88 consecutive intensive care patients of which half were treated with IHD and half with CRRT. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 54 ± 14 years for IHD and 60 ± 14 years for CVVHDF (NS). However, patients who received CVVHDF were significantly more critically ill (mean APACHE II scores: 24.4 ± 5.1 for IHD vs. 29.2 ± 5.7 for CVVHDF, p<0.003). Before treatment, the mean ionized calcium concentration was 1.177 ± 0.03 mmol/l for IHD and 1.172 ± 0.04 mmol/l for CVVHDF (NS), with abnormal values in 51.6% of IHD patients and in 68% of CVVHDF patients (NS). During treatment, hypocalcemia was significantly more common among CVVHDF patients (24.5% vs. 14.9%; p<0.011) while hypercalcemia was more frequent during IHD (36.1% vs. 25.6%; p<0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal serum ionized calcium concentrations are frequent in ARF patients before and during renal replacement. Once dialytic therapy is applied, CVVHDF is more likely to lower serum calcium concentrations, while IHD is more likely to induce hypercalcemia. Appreciation of these different biochemical effects may assist clinicians in adjusting dialytic therapy in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]