Search

Owing to their small size and safety profiles, adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) have become the vector of choice for gene therapy applications in the retina. In addition to the naturally occurring AAVs, several engineered variants with enhanced properties are being developed for experimental and therapeutic applications. Nonetheless, there are still some challenges impeding successful application of AAVs for a broader range of retinal gene therapies. The small size of AAV particles ensures efficient tissue transduction but also limits the packaging capacity to a few kilobases. Further, AAV's ability to cross retinal barriers is still an obstacle to pan-retinal transduction of the outer retina with tolerable doses. Lastly, despite overall safety, there have been recent reports of immune responses to AAVs in the eye. Hence, evaluation and prediction of immune responses to AAVs has come to be considered an integral part of future clinical success. This review focuses on the use of AAV in clinical trials for retinal diseases, and discusses developments of variants and novel strategies to overcome immune responses to AAVs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Inherited retinal diseases (IRDs) are a leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries, and gene therapy is quickly becoming a viable option to treat this group of diseases. Gene replacement using a viral vector has been successfully applied and advanced to commercial use for a rare group of diseases. This, and the advances in gene editing, are paving the way for the emergence of a new generation of therapies that use CRISPR–Cas9 to edit mutated genes in situ. These CRISPR-based agents can be delivered to the retina as transgenes in a viral vector, unpackaged transgenes or as proteins or messenger RNA using non-viral vectors. Although the eye is considered to be an immune-privileged organ, studies in animals, as well as evidence from clinics, have concluded that ocular gene therapies elicit an immune response that can under certain circumstances result in inflammation. In this review, we evaluate studies that have reported on pre-existing immunity, and discuss both innate and adaptive immune responses with a specific focus on immune responses to gene editing, both with non-viral and viral delivery in the ocular space. Lastly, we discuss approaches to prevent and manage the immune responses to ensure safe and efficient gene editing in the retina. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]