Search

Objective: Adenoidectomy is a surgical procedure most frequently performed by otolaryngologists. However, there are no universally accepted guidelines for the choice of the surgical approach in specific circumstances. Therefore, a network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to summarize existing studies and provide more evidence-based medical guidelines., Methods: A systematic search of the literature was conducted in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE databases from inception to 31 July 2021. A network meta-analysis of operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain score, and incidence of postoperative residual tissue was performed., Results: A total of 20 studies with 2329 patients were included. Four common surgical approaches, including powered vacuum shaver adenoidectomy (PVSA), plasma field ablation adenoidectomy (PFAA), curettage adenoidectomy (CUA), and suction diathermy adenoidectomy (SDA), were compared for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain score, and incidence of postoperative residual tissue. There were no significant differences between the surgical techniques for the 3 endpoints, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative residual tissue. The data showed lower postoperative pain scores for PFAA than for CUA (MD = -3.45, 95% CI [-6.01, -0.95]). There were no significant differences in other surgical approaches for postoperative pain scores., Conclusion: There were no significant differences between PVSA, PFAA, CUA, and SDA for operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative residual tissue. PFAA had advantages over CUA for postoperative pain scores.

Objective: Adenoid or adenotonsillar hypertrophy (AATH) causes upper airway obstruction, leading to cardiovascular complications. This meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy (AATE) on the cardiovascular system. Methods: Using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and EMBASE databases, we identified studies involving a comparison of preoperative and postoperative cardiovascular function in children with AATH. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis. Results: A total of 13 studies with 706 participants were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of patients after AATE compared with preoperative values. The left ventricular myocardial function index (LVMPI) and the right ventricular myocardial function index (RVMPI) showed a significant decrease after the operation. Moreover, AATE prominently increased left ventricular ejection time (LVET) and right ventricular ejection time (RVET) and reduced the left ventricular interventricular septum diameter (LVIVSD) and the right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVedD). There was no significant difference in mPAP, LVMPI, RVMPI, LVET, RVET, LVIVSD, and RVedD between postoperative patients and healthy children (P > 0.05). Conclusion: AATE can improve cardiovascular function in pediatric patients with AATH. Specifically, it reduces mPAP and LVMPI/RVMPI in pediatric patients. Furthermore, AATE increases LVET and RVET and reduces LVIVSD and RVedD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]