Search

Advanced melanoma is associated with poor prognosis warranting the development of new therapeutics, such as oncolytic adenoviruses for immunovirotherapy. Since this approach critically depends on efficient transduction of targeted tumor cells, we screened a panel of 22 different adenovirus types for their internalization efficiency in melanoma cells. We demonstrated that the virions of Ad35, Ad38, and Ad3 have significantly higher internalization efficiency in melanoma cells than Ad5, so far the only adenovirus type used in clinical trials for melanoma. Therefore, we developed a conditionally replication-competent Ad5-based vector with the Ad35 fiber shaft and knob domains (Ad5/35) and compared its therapeutic efficacy with the homologous vector carrying the native Ad5 fiber. To further enhance virotherapy, we combined the oncolytic adenovirus vectors with intratumoral expression of measles virus fusogenic membrane glycoproteins H and F (MV-H/F) and dacarbazine chemotherapy. In a human melanoma xenograft model, established from a short-term culture of primary melanoma cells, we demonstrated that the Ad5/35-based therapy had a significantly greater anti-neoplastic effect than the homologous Ad5-based therapy. Furthermore, the combination of virotherapy, intratumoral expression of MV-H/F, and chemotherapy was clearly superior to single- or double-agent therapy. In conclusion, Ad35-based vectors are promising for the treatment of melanoma.

Background: Oncolytic adenoviruses are promising agents for the multimodal treatment of cancer. However, tumor-selectivity is crucial for their applicability in patients. Recent studies by several groups demonstrated that oncolytic adenoviruses with tumor-/tissue-specific expression of the E1 and E4 genes, which are pivotal for adenoviral replication, have a specificity profile that is superior to viruses that solely target the expression of E1 or E4 genes. Presently the E1 and E4 regions are modified in a time consuming sequential fashion., Results: Based on the widely used adenoviral cloning system AdEasy we generated a novel transfer vector that allows efficient and rapid generation of conditionally replication-competent adenovirus type 5 based vectors with the viral E1 and E4 genes under the transcriptional control of heterologous promoters. For insertion of the promoters of interest our transfer vector has two unique multiple cloning sites. Additionally, our shuttle plasmid allows encoding of a transgene within the E1A transcription unit. The modifications, including E1 mutations, are introduced into the adenoviral genome by a single homologous recombination step in Escherichia coli. Subsequently infectious viruses are rescued from plasmids. As a proof-of-concept we generated two conditionally replication-competent adenoviruses Ad.Ki x COX and Ad.COX x Ki with the promoters of the Ki-67 protein and the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) driving E1 and E4 and vice versa., Conclusion: We demonstrated with our cloning system efficient generation of double heterologous promoter controlled oncolytic adenoviral vectors by a single homologous recombination step in bacteria. The generated viruses showed preferential replication in tumor cells and in a subcutaneous HT-29 colon cancer xenograft model the viruses demonstrated significant oncolytic activity comparable with dl327.

Oncolytic adenoviruses have emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of tumors resistant to other treatment modalities. However, preclinical safety studies are hampered by the lack of a permissive nonhuman host. Screening of a panel of primary cell cultures from seven different animal species revealed that porcine cells support productive replication of human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) nearly as efficiently as human A549 cells, while release of infectious virus by cells from other animal species tested was diminished by several orders of magnitude. Restriction of productive Ad5 replication in rodent and rabbit cells seems to act primarily at a postentry step. Replication efficiency of adenoviral vectors harboring different E1 deletions or mutations in porcine cells was similar to that in A549 cells. Side-by-side comparison of the viral load kinetics in blood of swine and mice injected with Ad5 or a replication-deficient adenoviral vector failed to provide clear evidence for virus replication in mice. In contrast, evidence suggests that adenovirus replication occurs in swine, since adenoviral late gene expression produced a 13.5-fold increase in viral load in an individual swine from day 3 to day 7 and 100-fold increase in viral DNA levels in the Ad5-infected swine compared to the animal receiving a replication-deficient adenovirus. Lung histology of Ad5-infected swine revealed a severe interstitial pneumonia. Although the results in swine are based on a small number of animals and need to be confirmed, our data strongly suggest that infection of swine with human adenovirus or oncolytic adenoviral vectors is a more appropriate animal model to study adenoviral pathogenicity or pharmacodynamic and toxicity profiles of adenoviral vectors than infection of mice.