Search

Background: The value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is not completely understood. This study investigated the benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to prognostic stratification based on the Sarculator nomogram for STS. Methods: This study analyzed data from ISG‐STS 1001, a randomized study that tested 3 cycles of neoadjuvant anthracycline plus ifosfamide (AI) or histology‐tailored (HT) chemotherapy in adult patients with STS. The 10‐year predicted overall survival (pr‐OS) was estimated with the Sarculator and was stratified into higher (10‐year pr‐OS < 60%) and lower risk subgroups (10‐year pr‐OS ≥ 60%). Results: The median pr‐OS was 0.63 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.51‐0.72) for the entire study population, 0.62 (IQR, 0.51‐0.70) for the AI arm, and 0.64 (IQR, 0.51‐0.73) for the HT arm. Three‐ and 5‐year overall survival (OS) were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82‐0.93) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71‐0.86) in lower risk patients and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.70‐0.85) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.51‐0.72) in the higher risk patients (log‐rank test, P =.004). In higher risk patients, the 3‐ and 5‐year Sarculator‐predicted and study‐observed OS rates were 0.68 and 0.58, respectively, and 0.85 and 0.66, respectively, in the AI arm (P =.04); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.69 and 0.60, respectively, and 0.69 and 0.55, respectively (P >.99). In lower risk patients, the 3‐ and 5‐year Sarculator‐predicted and study‐observed OS rates were 0.85 and 0.80, respectively, and 0.89 and 0.82, respectively, in the AI arm (P =.507); the corresponding figures in the HT arm were 0.87 and 0.81, respectively, and 0.86 and 0.74, respectively (P =.105). Conclusions: High‐risk patients treated with AI performed better than predicted, and this adds to the evidence for the efficacy of neoadjuvant AI in STS. Lay Summary: People affected by soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk wall are at some risk of developing metastasis after surgery.Preoperative or postoperative chemotherapy has been tested in clinical trials to reduce the chances of distant metastasis. However, study findings have not been conclusive.This study stratified the risk of metastasis for people affected by sarcomas who were included in a clinical trial testing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Exploiting the prognostic nomogram Sarculator, it found a benefit for chemotherapy when the predicted risk, based on patient and tumor characteristics, was high. This analysis of the ISG‐STS 1001 trial, which compares anthracycline plus ifosfamide and histology‐tailored chemotherapy in 5 high‐risk soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities and trunk wall, supports the Sarculator nomogram for stratifying patient risk in clinical practice and in clinical trials that will investigate perioperative therapies for soft tissue sarcomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Offering ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies in premenopausal women with newly diagnosed breast cancer candidates to undergo chemotherapy is standard of care. However, few data are available on uptake and main reasons for refusing these options. Methods: The PREFER study (NCT02895165) is an observational, prospective study enrolling premenopausal women with early breast cancer, aged between 18 and 45 years, candidates to receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. Primary objective is to collect information on acceptance rates and reasons for refusal of the proposed strategies for ovarian function and/or fertility preservation available in Italy. Results: At the study coordinating center, 223 patients were recruited between November 2012 and December 2020. Median age was 38 years (range 24 – 45 years) with 159 patients (71.3%) diagnosed at ≤40 years. Temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) was accepted by 58 out of 64 (90.6%) patients aged 41-45 years and by 151 out of 159 (95.0%) of those aged ≤40 years. Among patients aged ≤40 years, 57 (35.8%) accepted to access the fertility unit to receive a complete oncofertility counseling and 29 (18.2%) accepted to undergo a cryopreservation technique. Main reasons for refusal were fear of delaying the initiation of antineoplastic treatments and contraindications to the procedure or lack of interest in future childbearing. Patients with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer had a tendency for a higher acceptance rates of ovarian function and/or fertility preservation strategies than those with hormone-receptor negative disease. Conclusions: More than 90% of premenopausal women with early breast cancer, and particularly those with hormone receptor-positive disease, were concerned about the potential risk of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency and/or infertility and accepted GnRHa administration. Less than 1 out of 5 women aged ≤40 years accepted to undergo cryopreservation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]