Search

Background: Although skeletal maturity and brace wear time contribute to the success of brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the extent of initial in-brace correction for ensuring successful outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesized that the degree of initial in-brace correction correlates with brace success in patients with AIS.Method: The study included 135 AIS patients with a major Cobb angle of 20°-40° treated with a thoracic lumbosacral orthosis for at least one year and followed up for skeletal maturity. The subjects were divided into two groups: the skeletally immature group (group I, n = 72), who met the Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Trial study protocol at the start of brace treatment, and the skeletally mature group (group M, n = 63). Treatment success was defined as not needing surgical treatment and a major Cobb angle <40° at the end of brace treatment.Results: In both groups, the mean major Cobb angles before treatment, while wearing the brace, and at the end of brace treatment were 30.6°/31.7°, 22.9°/24.2°, and 38.8°/33.9° (p < 0.05), respectively, and the treatment success rate was 56.9% and 77.8%, respectively (p < 0.05). Univariate regression analysis revealed the following risk factors: Risser grade 0 in group I, major Cobb angles before treatment, initial in-brace major Cobb angle, and in-brace correction rate in both groups. Cutoff values of in-brace major Cobb angle for treatment success calculated by ROC curve in groups I and M were 24° and 29°, respectively.Conclusions: In-brace major scoliosis correction of <25° in patients with immature skeletal status and <30° in patients with mature skeletal structure should be aimed at to achieve significant brace treatment success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fulcrum-bending (FB) correction is considered to provide the best estimation of main thoracic (MT) curve flexibility and postoperative correction in surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, few studies evaluated the usefulness of FB radiographs for proximal thoracic (PT) curve. We aimed to perform flexibility assessments using both active side-bending (SB) and FB radiographs and evaluate surgical outcomes after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for Lenke type 2 AIS. This study included 38 consecutive patients with Lenke type 2 AIS who underwent PSF using a pedicle screw construct with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic parameters, including correction rate, SB and FB flexibility, and FB correction index (FBCI: [correction rate/FB flexibility] × 100), were evaluated preoperatively, immediately after surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up. The clinical outcomes were preoperatively evaluated using the Scoliosis Research Outcomes Instrument-22 and at the follow-up. All scoliosis curves significantly improved and shoulder balance shifted toward left shoulder elevation (all comparisons, p < 0.0001). There were significant differences between the SB and FB corrections in the PT and MT curves (p < 0.0001). The magnitudes of the discrepancies between the SB and FB corrections in the PT and MT curves were 11.2° ± 5.2° and 11.6° ± 7.2°, respectively. FB correction did not differ from postoperative Cobb angles correction immediately after surgery or at the 2-year follow-up; the mean FBCIs in the PT and MT curves were 98.8% and 105.5%, respectively. The self-image domain SRS-22 scores had significantly increased at the 2-year follow-up (p < 0.0001). There were significant differences between the SB and FB corrections, and FB correction tended to approximate the postoperative curve correction (FBCI = 100%) for PT and MT curves in patients with Lenke type 2 AIS. FB flexibility is more reliable than SB flexibility in evaluating actual curve flexibility even for the PT curve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective long-term follow-up study.Objective: To investigate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) status in middle-aged patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated non-surgically.Summary Of Background Data: The HRQOL status using various established questionnaires for non-operated AIS patients has not been fully investigated in long-term follow-up surveys.Methods: Inclusion criteria were non-surgical treatment for AIS, more than or equl to 30° major scoliosis at skeletal maturity (Risser grade ≥4), and age more than or equl to 30 years at the time of the survey. A total of 107 AIS patients were included and divided into three groups (single main thoracic [MT] curve group; n = 50, single thoracolumbar/lumbar [TL/L] curve group; n = 19, and double-major [DM] curve group; n = 38) based on curve location at skeletal maturity. Age- and sex-matched volunteers were selected as the control group.Results: There were no significant differences in age at survey, body mass index, bone mineral density of the femoral neck, and skeletal muscle mass index among the groups. In all groups, major scoliosis progressed by approximately 0.5°/yr from the time of skeletal maturity to the survey. The thoracolumbar (TL/L) and double-major (DM) groups showed significantly worse visual analog scale scores for low back pain compared with the main thoracice (MT) group (P < 0.05). The all-scoliosis groups showed significantly worse scores for self-image domain of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument-22 (SRS-22) than the control group (P < 0.0001). The TL/L group showed significantly worse scores for walking ability and social function domains of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in Oswestory Disability Index and Short-Form-12 among the four groups.Conclusion: AIS patients with single MT curve maintain equal HRQOL status compared with healthy controls. Patients with structural TL/L curves are likely to experience greater annual TL/L curve progression and have substantial low back pain or worse low back pain-specific HRQOL status during middle age.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]