Search

Recently remodeling of lumbar soft tissues has received increased research attention. However, the major determinants that influence remodeling need to be elucidated in order to understand the impact of different rehabilitation modalities on tissue remodeling. The main aim of this study was to explore the between-subject variance of different measures of lumbar soft tissues quantified with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). RUSI measures (n = 8) were collected from 30 subjects without and 34 patients with LBP: (1) lumbar multifidus (LM) echogenicity (fatty infiltration/fibrosis) at three vertebral levels (L3/L4, L4/L5 and L5/S1) (n = 3); (2) posterior layer thickness of the thoracolumbar fascia (n = 1); and (3) thickness of the fasciae surrounding the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), and transversus abdominis (TrA) (n = 4). Forward stepwise multivariate regression modeling was conducted with these RUSI measures as dependent variables, using the following independent variables as potential determinants: age, sex, the presence of LBP, body size/composition characteristics (height, weight, trunk length, subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominal, and LM muscles), trunk muscle function (or activation) as determined with the percent thickness change of LM, EO, IO, and TrA muscles during a standardized effort (RUSI measures), and physical activity level during sport and leisure activities as estimated with a self-report questionnaire. Two or three statistically significant predictors (or determinants) were selected in the regression model of each RUSI measure (n = 8 models), accounting for 26-64% of their total variance. The subcutaneous tissue thickness on the back accounted for 15-30% variance of LM echogenicity measures and thoracolumbar fascia thickness while the subcutaneous tissue thickness over the abdominals accounted for up to 42% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. The thickness of IO at rest accounted for 13-21% variance of all investigated abdominal fasciae except the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO. Pain status accounted for 13-18% variance of the anterior and posterior fasciae of the TrA. Age accounted for 11-14% variance of LM echogenicity at all investigated vertebral levels while sex accounted for 15-21% variance of LM echogenicity at L3/L4 and fascia separating subcutaneous adipose tissue and EO muscle. The function (or activation) of EO and LM at L3/L4 accounted for 8-11% variance of the thoracolumbar fascia and fascia separating TrA and intra-abdominal content (TrA posterior fascia), respectively. Finally, the physical activity level during sport activities accounted for 7% variance of the fascia separating the subcutaneous adipose tissues and the EO muscle. These findings suggest that determinants other than body size characteristics may impact the remodeling of lumbar soft tissues, more importantly the subcutaneous adipose tissue deposits (thickness RUSI measures), which are associated with ectopic fat deposition in the LM and in the fasciae that are more closely positioned to the surface. While age, sex, and pain status explain some variability, modifiable factors such as physical activity level as well as trunk muscle thickness and function were involved. Overall, these results suggest that rehabilitation can potentially impact tissue remodeling, particularly in terms of intramuscular and perimuscular adipose tissues.

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEPs) act positively on clinical outcome measures in patients with low back pain (LBP), but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Among the various neuromuscular mechanisms, a good candidate is better activation of the abdominal wall, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI). Objectives To determine whether RUSI measures are (1) sensitive to LBP status and treatment (LSEP) and (2) correlate with clinical outcomes following the LSEP. Design An exploratory one-arm clinical trial with healthy participants as a control group. Setting LSEP was delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes were measured in a laboratory setting. Participants Thirty-one patients with nonacute LBP and 30 healthy controls. Methods Outcome measures were performed before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and with the same time interval for control participants to compare with patients at baseline. Main outcome measurements Pain, disability, as well as static (at rest) and dynamic (percent thickness change) RUSI measures for abdominal muscles (transversus abdominis, internal oblique [IO], and external oblique [EO]). Results Patients did not produce systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even if patients had significant improvement in pain and disability. However, the correlational analyses between the absolute change (pre- to post-LSEP) (1) of EO and IO thickness (in mm) at rest (bilaterally), and (2) in pain following the LSEP were significant and consistent (range: .36-.45) in patients. Conclusions Although positive clinical improvements were observed following LSEP, there were minimal systematic changes in RUSI measures, likely because patients were not different from controls at baseline. Correlational analyses, however, indicated that greater reductions in pain were associated with reduced thickness of the EO and IO following the LSEP, suggesting the presence of some heterogeneity (or clinical subgroups) among the patients. Level of evidence II.

Low back pain (LBP) has been previously associated with delayed anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) determined by trunk muscle activation. Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) for patients with LBP may restore the trunk neuromuscular control of the lumbar spine, and normalize APAs. This exploratory study aimed at testing the reliability of EMG and kinematics-based postural adjustment measures over an 8-week interval, assessing their sensitivity to LBP status and treatment and examining their relationship with clinical outcomes.Muscle activation of 10 trunk muscles, using surface electromyography (EMG), and lumbar angular kinematics were recorded during a rapid arm-raising/lowering task. Patients with LBP were tested before and after an 8-week LSEP. Healthy controls receiving no treatment were assessed over the same interval to determine the reliability of the measures and act as a control group at baseline. Muscle activation onsets and reactive range of motion, range of velocities and accelerations were assessed for between group differences at baseline and pre- to post-treatment effects within patients with LBP using t-tests. Correlations between these dependent variables and the change of clinical outcomes (pain, disability) over treatment were also explored.Kinematic-based measures showed comparable reliability to EMG-based measures. Between-group differences were found in lumbar lateral flexion ROM at baseline (patients controls). In the patients with LBP, lateral flexion velocity and acceleration significantly increased following the LSEP. Correlational analyses revealed that lumbar angular kinematics were more sensitive to changes in pain intensity following the LSEP compared to EMG measures. These findings are interpreted in from the perspective of guarding behaviors and lumbar stability hypotheses.Future clinical trials are needed to target patients with and without delayed APAs at baseline and to explore the sensitivity of different outcome measures related to APAs. Different tasks more challenging to postural stability may need to be explored to more effectively reveal APA dysfunction.

Tendon integrity can be described using a wide range of biomarkers via specialized analysis software for images recorded by musculoskeletal ultrasonography. This study proposes a minimal biomarker data set to characterize Achilles tendon ultrasound images and to differentiate between symptomatic and asymptomatic Achilles tendon images. Forty-one individuals with unilateral Achilles tendinopathy and 35 healthy controls had their Achilles tendon images recorded bilaterally by ultrasonography in the longitudinal and transverse planes. A set of 22 biomarkers, organized around three dimensions (geometric, composition and texture), were computed in each plane. A symmetry index, reflecting relative side differences, was compared between groups and analyzed through principal component analysis to isolate biomarkers that best explained data variance. A specific minimal data set was identified by linear regression in the longitudinal (mean thickness, echogenicity, variance and homogeneity at 90°) and transverse (mean thickness, echogenicity and mean homogeneity) planes to characterize and differentiate Achilles tendon integrity.

Low-back pain (LBP) has been recognized as the leading cause of disability worldwide. Lumbar instability has been considered as an important mechanism of LBP and one potential contributor to lumbar stability is trunk muscle reflex activity. However, due to the differences in experimental paradigms used to quantify trunk mechanics and trunk reflexes it remains unclear as to what extent the reflex pathway contributes to overall lumbar stability. The goal of this work was to determine to what extent reflexes of various trunk muscles were elicited by the small continuous perturbations normally used to quantify trunk mechanics. Electromyographic (EMG) activity was measured bilaterally from 3 trunk extensor muscles and 3 trunk flexor muscles at four epochs: 25–50ms, 50–75ms, 75–100ms and 100–125ms following each perturbation. Reflex activity was seen in all muscles as 34 of the 48 muscle-epoch combinations showed a significant reflex response to either perturbations in the forward or backward direction. However, the reflex EMG activity did not correlate with mechanical estimates of the reflex response. Thus, even though reflexes are indeed elicited by the small perturbations used to quantify trunk mechanics, their exact contribution to overall lumbar stability remains unknown.

Background Lumbar belts have been shown to increase lumbar stiffness, but it is unclear if this is associated with trunk muscle co-contraction, which would increase the compression on the spine. It has been hypothesized that lumbar belts increase lumbar stiffness by increasing intra-abdominal pressure, which would increase spinal stability without increasing the compressive load on the spine. Methods Trunk muscle activity and lumbar stiffness and damping were measured in healthy and low-back pain subjects during three conditions: no lumbar belt; wearing an extensible lumbar belt; wearing a non-extensible lumbar belt. Muscle activity was measured while subjects performed controlled forward and backward 20° trunk sways. Lumbar stiffness and damping were measured by applying random continuous perturbation to the chest. Findings External oblique activity was decreased when wearing either lumbar belt during all phases of movement, while rectus abdominis and iliocostalis activity were decreased during the phase of movement where the muscles were maximally active while wearing either belt. Trunk stiffness was greatly increased by wearing either belt. There were no consistent differences in either lumbar stiffness or muscle activity between the two belts. Wearing a lumbar belt had little to no effect on damping. There were no group differences in any of the measures between healthy and low-back pain populations. Interpretation The findings are consistent with the hypothesis that lumbar belts can increase spinal stability by increasing intra-abdominal pressure, without any increase in the compressive load on the spine. The findings can also be generalized, for the first time, to subjects with low-back pain.

Two potential interventions for enhancing lumbar stability are to actively increase abdominal muscle activity, either through the abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) or bracing, and passively increase lumbar stiffness using a lumbosacral orthosis (LSO).To compare the increase in lumbar stiffness after 2 active interventions (ADIM versus bracing) and 1 passive intervention (LSO), and to evaluate the combined effect of active (abdominal bracing) and passive interventions.In this experimental and comparative study, lumbar stiffness, a surrogate measure of lumbar stability, was estimated in 25 healthy individuals during 7 trunk perturbation conditions: (1) control, (2) ADIM, (3) bracing at 5% of right external oblique maximal voluntary activation (5% bracing), (4) bracing at 10% of right external oblique maximal voluntary activation (10% bracing), (5) LSO, (6) LSO plus 5% bracing, and (7) LSO plus 10% bracing. Electromyographic biofeedback of the external oblique was provided on a monitor, while ultrasound was used for the ADIM to ensure a sustained contraction of the transversus abdominis.The ADIM, 5% bracing, and 10% bracing active interventions generated comparable lumbar stiffness. However, considering that bracing can range from 10% to 20%, it may be superior to hollowing, as further estimated with a mixed-effect statistical model. Combining bracing and an LSO resulted in an additive effect on lumbar stiffness.Bracing and ADIM produced comparable lumbar stiffness, as they were performed at the same overall abdominal activation levels (5% and 10% maximal voluntary activation). The independent effects of bracing and LSO raises the possibility of combining these interventions in some circumstances. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(4):262-271. Epub 18 Jan 2019. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8565.

Background Lumbar spine stability is regularly studied by positioning different loads at different heights and distance and measuring trunk muscle activation changes. Some of these studies have reported sex differences, but this needs to be revisited while controlling for confounding factors. Method 20 males and 20 females sustained three static standing postures, with various loads (0, 5 and 10% of body weight), to evaluate the effect of height and distance. Activation of 12 trunk muscles was recorded with surface electromyography (EMG). Results Females activated their external obliques a little more than males, with increases ranging between 1.5 and 2.3% of maximal voluntary activation (MVA), which corresponds to strong effect sizes (Cohen’s d ranging between 0.86 and 1.13). However, the significant Sex × Height, Sex × Distance and Sex × Load interactions observed for different trunk muscles led to small differential effects (≤1% MVA). Increasing load height slightly increased and decreased back and abdominal muscle activation, respectively, generally by less than 1% MVA. Conclusion The higher activation of the external obliques observed in females might be of clinical value, relative to the required overall trunk muscle activation (5%), to preserve lumbar stability. Other effects were negligible.

Background Previous findings suggest that wearing a lumbar belt may benefit some patients with low back pain; however, the mechanisms of action are not yet fully understood. Research question The effect of wearing two flexible (extensible and non-extensible) lumbar belts on trunk postural control was investigated during an unstable sitting task. Methods Healthy subjects and subjects with LBP sat on a wobbling chair, with and without the lumbar belts. Chair rotation was measured in the sagittal and frontal planes, and 10 linear and nonlinear measures of balance were computed to assess the quantity (3 measures) and quality (7 measures) of the movements. Results Both lumbar belts induced similar changes in specific measures of trunk postural control, for both subject groups, generally indicative of more instability and less controllability, but with low effect sizes (0.14 and 0.40). Subjects with LBP also showed lower entropy (complexity; effect size 0.93) and higher determinism (predictability; effect size 0.56) than healthy controls, under all test conditions. These findings indicate that the subjects with LBP used a less complex, more predictable trunk postural control strategy, suggestive of impaired adaptability and responsiveness to dynamic trunk postural control demands. The findings also suggest other factors related to dynamic adaptability may be impaired by lumbar belt use. Significance The effects of the lumbar belts on trunk postural control were small, however, their practical implications for the management of LBP remain to be determined in relation to other effects of lumbar belts (e.g. increased mechanical stiffness).

BACKGROUND The function of specific abdominal muscles can be assessed using both electromyography (EMG) and ultrasound imaging (USI) thickness measures. However, the relationship between these two measurements is not conclusive during sitting isometric trunk efforts. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to assess the relationship between USI thickness and EMG amplitude measures of the right external oblique (EO) muscle during isometric efforts in the sitting position. METHOD Eighteen subjects performed ramp isometric efforts progressing from 0 to 50% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in three trunk directions on a dynamometer: (1) forward flexion; (2) right lateral flexion; and (3) left axial rotation. USI and surface EMG amplitude measures of the EO muscle were recorded concomitantly and both normalized against rest values and maximal EMG, respectively. RESULTS EO muscle was significantly more activated (p < 0.001) during forward flexion (42% on average) and axial rotation (35%) than during lateral flexion (24%). Non-significant (r=0.01; P=0.979) to highly significant (r=0.98; P < 0.0001) and negative and positive Pearson correlations were observed between EMG and EO thickness measures for both flexion and rotation directions. CONCLUSION The negative correlations between EMG and USI measures as well as the great variability of these correlations across individuals suggest that USI is not a valid measures of EO muscle activity. USI thickness measures should be interpreted with great caution in research and clinical settings.

Lumbar stabilization programs reduce pain and disability, but the mechanisms of action underlying this treatment are unknown. Trunk postural control during unstable sitting represents a surrogate measure of motor control mechanisms involved to maintain the dynamic stability of the spine. This exploratory study aimed to determine the reliability of trunk postural control measures over an 8-week interval, their sensitivity to low back pain status and treatment and their relationship with clinical outcomes. Trunk postural control measures were determined in patients with low back pain before and after an 8-week lumbar stabilization exercise program. Healthy controls were assessed over the same interval, but without any treatment, to determine the reliability of the measures and act as a control group at baseline. The kinematics of a wobble chair during unstable sitting was summarized using different linear and nonlinear measures quantifying the quantity and quality of movement, respectively. The reliability of the measures was moderate to excellent. The results showed significant reduction in pain and disability following the intervention. While no impairment at baseline scores was found, some linear and nonlinear measures changed over the intervention period among the patient group. However, for nonlinear measures only, significant correlations were detected with the change scores of pain and disability. The change of measures over the intervention period was likely due to learning rather than the intervention as similar alteration was detected in the healthy subjects. The results suggest that only the quality (not the quantity) of movement may have relationship with pain and disability.

Workers with low back pain (LBP) may benefit from wearing a lumbar belt (LB), but the biomechanical and psychological mechanisms involved are not fully understood. Two types of flexible LB (extensible and non-extensible) were compared to a control condition (no LB) regarding pain-related (pain, fear of pain and catastrophizing) and biomechanical (range of motion - ROM) outcomes related to two tasks: maximal trunk flexion-extension and manual material handling. Healthy controls and participants with LBP were tested. During both tasks, the two LBs reduced the lumbar ROM in participants with LBP in the same way as healthy controls. This was observed even at the beginning of the trunk flexion movement, allowing generalization to many work tasks, that is to say tasks performed with small or deep trunk flexion. The two LBs reduced pain, fear of pain and catastrophizing in subjects with LBP. That may help a gradual re-exposure to physical work activities (disability prevention perspective), or maintaining these activities (secondary prevention perspective), following a LBP episode.

The aim of this study was to test whether determinants associated with lumbar stability can predict performance during unstable sitting (trunk postural control - TPC). If confirmed, unstable sitting could be viewed as a proxy measure for these determinants. Wobbling chair motion was measured in 58 subjects with an inertial sensor, and six outcomes were computed (mean frequency and velocity, frequency dispersion, two variables from the sway density analysis and Lyapunov exponent - short interval) to represent TPC performance. Subjects also performed five other trunk neuromuscular tests to quantify the thickness of back and abdominal muscles and connective tissues, lumbar proprioception, lumbar stiffness, feedforward and feedback control mechanisms, and trunk/muscle coordination. Four to five predictors explained between 36 and 47% of TPC outcomes variance, as determined with multivariate analyses. These predictors were mainly related to (1) angular kinematic parameters of the pelvis or lumbar spine following rapid arm movement, (2) lumbar intrinsic stiffness, (3) thickness of perimuscular connective tissues surrounding specific abdominal muscles, (4) activation onsets of specific trunk muscles (IO/TrA and iliocostalis lumborum) before rapid arm movement, and (5) percent thickness change of internal oblique (IO) and transversus abdominis (TrA) muscles. Lumbar proprioception and reflex responses were not predictive, possibly due to the lack of appropriate measurements. These findings support the use of TPC in unstable sitting as a proxy measure for determinants associated with lumbar stability. This might be useful in research and clinical settings, considering time and equipment constraints associated with measuring these determinants individually.

Thirty manual material handlers (15 experts and 15 novices) were invited to perform series of box transfers under conditions similar to those of large distribution centers. The objective of the present study was to verify whether multiple box transfers leading to fatigue would also lead to differences between expert and novice workers in joint motions and in back loading variables (L5/S1 moments). The task consisted in transferring 24 15-kg boxes from one pallet to another (4 layers of boxes; 6 boxes/layer: 3 in the front row, 3 in the back) at a self-determined pace and then at an imposed pace of 9 lifts/min for a total of 240 lifts. The underlying idea was to set a challenging task that would force the experts to use their skills. Full-body 3D kinematic data were collected as well as external foot forces. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1. The results clearly show that the experts bent their lumbar spine less (10° less) and were closer (4 cm) to the box than novice workers. Knee flexions were similar in both groups except when the box was lifted from ground level (expert ≈ 71°, novice ≈ 48°). The peak resultant moment was not statistically different (expert = 168 Nm, novice = 184 Nm) although experts had lower values on average than novices when lifting heights (and deposit heights) of the boxes increased. Therefore, experts differed from novice workers mostly in the posture-related variables. These differences are especially important to consider when the box is located on the ground, as the back posture and back loading are then at their greatest magnitude and could have a major impact on the distribution of internal forces on the spine.

This study sought to determine whether repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain (RISP) could be demonstrated in healthy individuals in response to experimentally induced musculoskeletal pain. This study also assessed the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on RISP. The relation between the index of RISP and psychological factors such as catastrophizing and fear of pain was also explored. The sample consisted of 56 healthy (35 women, 21 men) participants who underwent 2 testing sessions, separated by 24 hours. In the first session, musculoskeletal pain was induced with a delayed-onset muscle soreness protocol. During the second session, participants were randomly assigned to the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation or placebo condition and were asked to rate their pain as they lifted a series of 18 weighted canisters. An index of RISP was derived as the change in pain ratings across repeated lifts. Approximately 25% of participants showed evidence of RISP. Results also revealed that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation attenuated the RISP effect. Psychological measures (fear of pain, catastrophizing) were not significantly correlated with the index of RISP, but the index of RISP was significantly correlated with a measure of physical tolerance. Discussion addresses the clinical implications of the findings as well as the potential mechanisms underlying RISP. Perspective This study showed that RISP could be demonstrated in healthy individuals in response to experimentally induced musculoskeletal pain with delayed-onset muscle soreness. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation led to a significant reduction in RISP.

This study examined the relation between return to work and the maintenance of treatment gains made over the course of a rehabilitation intervention. The study sample consisted of 110 individuals who had sustained whiplash injuries in rear collision motor vehicle accidents and were work-disabled at the time of enrolment in the study. Participants completed pre- and post-treatment measures of pain severity, disability, cervical range of motion, depression, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and catastrophizing. Pain severity was assessed again at 1-year follow-up. At 1-year follow-up, 73 participants had returned to work and 37 remained work-disabled. Analyses revealed that participants who returned to work were more likely to maintain treatment gains (77.5%) than participants who remained work-disabled (48%), χ = 6.3, P < 0.01. The results of a regression analysis revealed that the relation between return to work and the maintenance of treatment gains remained significant (β = 0.30, P < 0.01), even when controlling for potential confounders such as pain severity, restricted range of motion, depression, and pain catastrophizing. The Discussion addresses the processes by which prolonged work-disability might contribute to the failure to maintain treatment gains. Important knowledge gaps still remain concerning the individual, workplace, and system variables that might play a role in whether or not the gains made in the rehabilitation of whiplash injury are maintained. Clinical implications of the findings are also addressed.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the effect of pain interference and attentional interference on the anticipatory postural adjustments of trunk muscles in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients performed rapid flexion movements of the right arm under 6 conditions, namely a control condition and conditions with different attention demands. The latency between the activations of the shoulder and different trunk muscles, as measured with surface electromyography, was used as the outcome. Using repeated measures analysis of variance, attention conditions and group comparisons were tested between those who scored high and low on pain intensity, fear of movement, or pain catastrophizing. RESULTS: There were significant (although minimal) interactive effects but significant and potentially clinically relevant group and attention main effects. The group with the lowest scores showed delayed activity (14 to 29 ms) relative to those with higher scores. One attention-demanding condition delayed (20 to 35 ms) the latencies of some trunk muscles relative to the control condition, namely the one that was the most attention-demanding according to the reaction time results. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that patients with chronic low back pain, who are characterized by higher scores on some pain-related variables (visual analog scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Catastrophizing Scale), react favorably to protect the spine from further pain and injuries but would be at greater risk of injury when performing a complex physical task requiring more attention demand.

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs (LSEP) produce positive effects on clinical outcomes, but the underlying mechanisms remain relatively unexplored. Psychological and neuromuscular mechanisms can be involved, such as a better activation of the lumbar multifidus, which represents one possibility. Objectives To determine the following: (1) the effect of an LSEP on lumbar multifidus muscle thickness and activation, as measured with rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI), in patients with low back pain (LBP); (2) the correlation between RUSI measures and any change in clinical outcomes following the LSEP; and (3) the reliability of RUSI measures in control subjects over 8 weeks. Design One-arm clinical trial with healthy subjects as a control group; reliability study. Setting LSEP delivered in a clinical setting; outcomes measured in a laboratory setting. Participants A total of 34 patients with nonacute LBP and 28 healthy control subjects. Methods Outcomes were measured before and after an 8-week LSEP in patients with LBP, and at the same time interval (without treatment, to assess reliability) in control subjects. Main Outcome Measurements Pain numeric rating scale, Oswestry Disability Index (function), as well as RUSI measures for the lumbar multifidus (LM) muscles at 3 vertebral levels (L5-S1, L4-5, and L3-4) during rest (static) and dynamic contractions (percent thickness change). Results Patients did not show systematic changes in RUSI measures relative to controls, even though RUSI impairments were observed at baseline (dynamic measure at L5-S1) and even though patients had significant improvements in pain and disability. Correlational analyses with these clinical outcomes suggested that patients had reduced muscle thickness at baseline that was associated with a greater reduction in disability following LSEP; however, LM activation measured at baseline showed the opposite. Static RUSI measures showed excellent reliability at the L4-5 and L3-4 levels, whereas dynamic measures were not reliable. Conclusions Patients showed less muscle activation than controls at baseline (L5-S1 level), but the LSEP did not normalize this impairment. The links between RUSI measures and the change in clinical outcomes during LSEP should be further explored. This clinical trial has been recorded in the International Standard Registered Clinical/soCial sTudy Number (ISRCTN) registry (ID: ISRCTN94152969). Level of Evidence II

Background Lumbar stabilization exercise programs should normalize the aberrant movements patterns often observed in patients with low back pain. This study aimed to determine the effect of an 8-week lumbar stabilization program on EMG/kinematics measures of the aberrant movement patterns in such patients. A secondary goal was to assess the 8-week test-retest reliability of these measures. Methods The patients followed an 8-week lumbar stabilization program while no intervention was carried out on the controls. Before and after this period, kinematics of the spine along with the EMG of paraspinal muscles were recorded during trunk maximal flexion-extension. ANOVAs tested the effect of the intervention in the patients, relative to the controls. Within the patients, correlation of the EMG/kinematics measures with the change in disability and pain following the intervention was investigated. Findings A significant reduction in pain (Hedges's g effect size = 2.31) and improvement in function (g = 1.74) was reported in the patients. While EMG/kinematics measures disclosed impairments in the patients at baseline compared to the controls, no change was observed over the intervention. Nevertheless, the change of lumbar range of motion was positively correlated (r = 0.42; P = 0.015) with the change in disability. Interpretation Although pain and disability decreased following the intervention, the EMG/kinematics measures did not change concomitantly suggesting that the patients learned to stiffen the lumbar spine during the treatment, and this technique was applied even if pain and disability unequivocally decreased after the treatment, which would not necessarily be beneficial to the patient.

Objectives Previous research has shown that sensitivity to movement-evoked pain is associated with higher scores on self-report measures of disability in individuals who have sustained whiplash injuries. However, it remains unclear whether sensitivity to movement-evoked pain is associated with work-disability. The aim of the present study was to examine the relation between sensitivity to movement-evoked pain and occupational status in individuals receiving treatment for whiplash injury. Methods A sample of 105 individuals with whiplash injuries participated in a testing session where different measures of pain (i.e. spontaneous pain, multi-site pain, sensitivity to movement-evoked pain) were collected during the performance of a simulated occupational lifting task. Results Hierarchical logistic regression analysis revealed that the measures of multisite pain and sensitivity to movement-evoked pain made significant independent contributions to the prediction of work-disability. Discussion The findings suggest that including measures of multisite pain and sensitivity to movement evoked pain in assessment protocols has the potential to increase the value of pain assessments for the prediction of occupational disability associated with whiplash injury. Clinical and theoretical implications of the findings are addressed.

Purpose: Roman chair exercises are popular for improving back muscle endurance but do not specifically target back muscles. This study aimed to determine whether an adaptation of the Roman chair exercise would induce more fatigue in back muscles than in hip extensors. Methods: For this study, 16 healthy subjects and 18 patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain performed trunk flexion-extension cycles until exhaustion in a Roman chair with hips flexed at 40°. Surface EMG signals were recorded bilaterally on four back muscles and two hip extensors (gluteus maximus and biceps femoris). Motion analysis of the trunk segments (pelvis, lumbar, and thoracic spines) was also carried out. Results: In both groups, EMG revealed clear evidence of muscle fatigue for the gluteus maximus, less clear evidence of fatigue for the lower back muscles, and motor unit recruitment (without fatigue) for the upper back muscles and biceps femoris. A change of muscle activation pattern was emphasized throughout the exercise bout, with some lower back muscles showing an increase followed by a decrease or leveling off of activation and with upper back muscles showing an increased activation at the end. Kinematic analyses revealed a progressive decrease (11°) in the lumbar range of motion (ROM) and a progressive increase in hip (2°) and thoracic (7°) ROM during the exercise bout. Conclusions: Roman chairs allow more freedom to change the kinematics of the spine during the exercise (less lumbar and more thoracic motion) to delay lower back muscle fatigue by sharing the load between the lower and upper back muscles. Even with adaptations to reduce hip extensors fatigue, this may make this exercise not as specific as wanted for fatiguing lower back muscles.

The assessment of trunk muscle activation and coordination using dynamometric measurements made in one anatomical plane has hardly minimized the production of out-of-plane coupled moments (CMs). This absence of control may add much variability in moment component partition as well as in recorded muscle activation. The aim of the study was to assess whether providing these CMs as visual feedback efficiently reduces them and whether this feedback influences trunk muscle activation. Twenty men performed five 5-s static ramp submaximal contractions, ranging from 0% to 55% of the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), in six different directions while standing in a static dynamometer measuring L5/S1 moments. For each direction, four feedback conditions were offered, ranging from simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane of exertion, to full 3D-feedback. Surface electromyographic signals were collected for eight back and six abdominal muscles. Muscle activation amplitudes and CMs were extracted at each 10% force level from 10% to 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). Providing 3D-feedback significantly reduced the CMs, at 50% MVC, by about 1-6%, 1-8% and 2-10% MVC in the sagittal, frontal and transverse planes, respectively. Providing 3D-feedback produced relatively small systematic effects (2-7%) on trunk muscle activation. However, the subjects responded differently to adequately control the coupled moments, leading in some cases to relatively high inter-individual differences in muscle activation. Interestingly, the statistical differences, and size of the effects, were mainly observed when the primary exertions were performed in the frontal and transverse planes. The implications of these findings are discussed.

This study aimed at documenting the reliability of different thresholds used for defining the muscular rest of the trapezius muscles of 27 computer office workers, using surface electromyography (EMG) signals collected in the field. Measurement strategies for increasing the reliability of the results were also explored. Ten different thresholds to define muscular rest were compared: 1) five normalised (individualised) thresholds; 2) three absolute thresholds (in muV); 3) two absolute but individualised thresholds. The reliability was assessed using both a 15-min standardised computer task and 45 min of regular computer work. The main findings were: 1) overall, in a repeated measures study design, muscular rest variables were more reliable with the use of absolute thresholds when compared to normalised and individualised thresholds; 2) excellent reliability (index of dependability0.75) can be reached when averaging the scores over 2 days; 3) using a standardised task instead of regular work does not necessarily lead to more reliable results.

Accurate quantification of the trunk transient response to sudden loading is crucial in prevention, evaluation, rehabilitation and training programs. An iterative dynamic kinematics-driven approach was used to evaluate the temporal variation of trunk muscle forces, internal loads and stability under sudden application of an anterior horizontal load. The input kinematics is hypothesized to embed basic dynamic characteristics of the system that can be decoded by our kinematics-driven approach. The model employs temporal variation of applied load, trunk forward displacement and surface EMG of select muscles measured on two healthy and one chronic low-back pain subjects to a sudden load. A finite element model accounting for measured kinematics, nonlinear passive properties of spine, detailed trunk musculature with wrapping of global extensor muscles, gravity load and trunk biodynamic characteristics is used to estimate the response under measured sudden load. Results demonstrate a delay of approximately 200ms in extensor muscle activation in response to sudden loading. Net moment and spinal loads substantially increase as muscles are recruited to control the trunk under sudden load. As a result and due also to the trunk flexion, system stability significantly improves. The reliability of the kinematics-driven approach in estimating the trunk response while decoding measured kinematics is demonstrated. Estimated large spinal loads highlight the risk of injury that likely further increases under larger perturbations, muscle fatigue and longer delays in activation.

To examine the effect of pelvic stabilization and two lower-limb configurations on the EMG activity of back and hip extensor muscles during a dynamic back extension exercise on a machine and to compare them between sexes.Twenty-two healthy volunteers (11 men and 11 women) performed five trunk flexion-extension cycles at 40% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in a machine designed for back exercise. Two different positions were used: 1) seated position (seat horizontal, knees at 90 degrees ) and 2) semisitting position (seat slightly tilted forward at 15 degrees , knees at 45 degrees of flexion). In each position, three pelvic stabilization conditions were tested: 1) unrestrained (control condition), 2) partially restrained (posteriorly), and 3) totally restrained (posteriorly and anteriorly). EMG signals were recorded bilaterally with 12 pairs of electrodes placed on back muscles as well as on the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris. The muscular activation level, that is, the percentage of EMG amplitude relative to the maximal EMG obtained from MVC, was used to asses the relative contribution of each muscle group across exercises.In both sexes, two main results were found: 1) pelvic stabilization (partially and totally restrained) significantly (P0.05) increased the activity of all back muscles (average of 12%) and 2) semisitting position significantly decreased (range = 8-27%) the activity of two hip extensors compared with the seated position. Sex differences were also observed relative to the activity of some back muscles as well as the biceps femoris.Combining pelvic stabilization and semisitting position in back exercise machines might be a useful way to localize the effects of endurance training at the back muscles and this in both the sexes.

Objective: To assess the effect of pelvic stabilization and hip position on the electromyographic activity of trunk extensors during Roman chair exercise. A secondary objective was to compare genders. Design: Repeated measures. Subjects: Eleven men and 11 women volunteers. Methods: Five trunk flexion-extension cycles for 3 Roman chair conditions: (i) pelvis unrestrained; (ii) pelvis restrained; and (iii) hip at 40° flexion. Electromyographic signals were recorded on the back muscles, as well as on the gluteus maximus and biceps femoris. The percentage of electro¬myographic amplitude relative to the maximal activity was used to assess the level of muscular activation of each muscle group across the exercises. Results: For both genders, the Roman chair conditions did not influence the activity of the back and gluteus muscles. The hip-at-40°-flexion condition significantly reduced the activity of the biceps femoris (average of 4–18%) relative to the other 2 conditions. Gender differences were observed on the activity of the biceps femoris in all Roman chair conditions. Conclusion: The hip-at-40°-flexion condition would allow the Roman chair exercise to train the targeted back muscles more specifically by overloading them over a longer duration in order to induce physiological changes.

This study aimed to (1) estimate the reliability of 36 centre of pressure (COP) summary measures in healthy participants and (2) identify the main sources of variability in order to estimate the most appropriate measurement strategies to improve reliability. Twelve healthy males performed, on two separate days, eight 1-min trials of quiet standing on a force platform in two conditions [eyes open (EO) and eyes closed (EC)]. The generalizability theory was used as a framework to estimate the magnitude of the different variance components (Subject, Trial, Day and all interactions) and the reliability of the measures corresponding to various simulations of measurement strategies. Reliability of the COP summary measures was poor to moderate. Intra-class correlation coefficients were generally higher with EO (mean: 0.46, range: 0.03-0.76) than with EC (mean: 0.41, range 0.02-0.72) across all summary measures. The majority of the variance was attributed to Subject (2%-76%), Subject x Day (0%-24%) and Subject x Day x Trial (16%-79%) variance components depending on the summary measure and condition. The reliability could be improved more efficiently by averaging measurements between-days than by increasing the number of trials during 1 day. For the majority of the summary measures, acceptable reliability can be achieved when at least seven or more trials are averaged during the same testing day.

Ambulatory assessment of trunk posture is important in improving our understanding of the risk of low back injury. Recently, small inertial sensors combining accelerometers, gyroscopes and magnetometers were developed and appear to be promising for measuring human movement. However, the validity of such sensors for assessing three-dimensional (3D) trunk posture in motion has not been documented. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a hybrid system (HS) composed of two inertial sensors for the 3D measurement of trunk posture. A secondary purpose was to explore the utility of adding another source of information, a potentiometer, to measure the relative rotation between both sensors in order to improve the validity of the system. The first sensor was placed over the sacrum and the second on the upper part of the thorax. Both sensors were linked by a flexible rod with a potentiometer. A complementary quaternion filter algorithm was used to estimate trunk orientation by taking advantage of the nine components of each sensor and the potentiometer. The HS's orientations were compared to those obtained from a 3D optoelectronic system. Validation of the HS was performed in three steps in which six subjects had to perform manual handling tasks in: (1) static postures; (2) dynamic motions of short duration (30s); and (3) dynamic motions of long duration (30min). The results showed that the root mean square (RMS) error of the HS was generally below 3 degrees for the flexion and lateral bending axes, and less than 6 degrees for the torsion axis, and that this error was lower for the short-duration tests compared to the long-duration one. The potentiometer proved to be an essential addition, particularly when the magnetometer signals were corrupted and only the gyroscope and accelerometer could be combined. It is concluded that the HS can be a useful tool for quantifying 3D trunk posture in motion.

Expertise is a key factor modulating the risk of low back disorders (LBD). Through years of practice in the workplace, the typical expert acquires high level specific skills and maintains a clean record of work-related injuries. Ergonomic observations of manual materials handling (MMH) tasks show that expert techniques differ from those of novices, leading to the idea that expert techniques are safer. Biomechanical studies of MMH tasks performed by experts/novices report mixed results for kinematic/kinetic variables, evoking potential internal effect of expertise. In the context of series of box transfers simulated by actual workers, detailed internal loads predicted by a multiple-joint EMG-assisted optimization lumbar spine model are compared between experts and novices. The results confirmed that the distribution of internal moments are modulated by worker expertise. Experts flexed less their lumbar spine and exerted more active muscle forces while novices relied more on passive resistance of the muscles and ligamentous spine. More specifically for novices, the passive contributions came from global extensor muscles, selected local extensor muscles, and passive structures of the lumbar spine (ligaments and discs). The distinctive distribution of internal forces was not concomitant with a similar effect on joint forces, these forces being dependent on external loading which was equivalent between experts and novices. From a safety standpoint, the present results suggest that experts were more efficient than novices in partitioning internal moment contributions to balance net (external) loading. Thus, safer handling practices might be seen as a result of experts׳ experience.

Background Adequate neuromuscular control of the lumbar spine is required to prevent lumbar injuries. A trunk postural control test protocol, controlling for the influence of body size on performance, was implemented to carry out between-subject comparisons. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of sex and low back pain status with the use of two measures of trunk postural control, the first based on chair motion, and the second based on trunk motion. Methods Thirty-six subjects (with and without low back pain) performed three 60-s trunk postural control trials with their eyes closed while seated on an instrumented wobble chair, following a calibration procedure. Chair and trunk angular kinematics were measured with an optoelectronic system. A chair-based stabilogram and a trunk-based (lumbar spine) stabilogram were created using the angular motions produced in the sagittal and frontal planes. Twenty body-sway measures were computed for each stabilogram. Findings The calibration task efficiently controlled for the influence of body size. Several sex effects were detected, with most of them originating from the trunk-based measures. Subjects with low back pain and healthy controls showed comparable trunk postural control. Interpretation Sex differences were substantiated for the first time, but almost only with the trunk-based stabilogram, showing that the kinematic information captured on the trunk segments is quite different from what is captured on the wobble chair. Contrary to previous studies, pain status was not related to lowered trunk postural control, which can be attributed to the patients recruited or measurement reliability issues.

The aims of the study were: 1) to determine whether resting the forearms on the work surface, as compared to chair armrests, reduces muscular activation; 2) to compare the sensitivity of different electromyographic (EMG) summary parameters. Eighteen healthy subjects performed computer work (with keyboard and mouse alternately) for 20 min while resting their forearms on a work surface adjustable in height (Workstation A), on the chair's armrests with an adjustable workstation (Workstation B) or on their chair's armrests with a non-adjustable workstation (Workstation C). The EMG amplitude of the trapezius and deltoid muscles was little influenced by the workstations, whereas their EMG variability increased with Workstation A, which was interpreted as a positive effect. However, the EMG amplitude of the mouse-side extensor digitorum muscle was higher with Workstation A. Alternating between resting the forearms on the work surface and on the chairs' armrests could solicit different muscles during computer work, and could be considered as a strategy for preventing musculoskeletal disorders. The new exposure variation analysis summary parameters used were sensitive to small workstation changes, thus supporting their use in future studies.

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate if rest intervals of 10 or 15 min allow the back muscles to recover completely, from an electromyographic (EMG) point of view, after performing a fatiguing contraction. Twelve healthy males stood in a dynamometer with the trunk in a vertical position and performed three trunk extension fatiguing trials (30 s contractions sustained at 75% of the maximal voluntary contraction) separated successively by a 15 min (between trial 1 and 2) and a 10 min (between trial 2 and 3) rest period. The EMG signals from four pairs of back muscles were collected at 2,048 Hz with active surface electrodes. Different EMG indices computed from the temporal and frequency domains of the EMG signal were considered to evaluate muscular fatigue and recovery from trial 1 to trial 2 and from trial 2 to trial 3. No significant differences (one-way ANOVAs between the three trials, alpha=0.05) were obtained for the different EMG indices computed. The percentage of variance explained by the inter-trial effect was none in most cases, corroborating that no systematic error was present between the trials and suggesting that complete muscle recovery was allowed with 10 or 15 min rest periods. These results support the use of rest periods of 10 to 15 min between multiple fatigue tests, at least for back muscles and for high intensity short duration fatigue tasks as the one used in the present study.

The purpose of this study was to assess different measurement strategies to increase the reliability of different electromyographic (EMG) indices developed for the assessment of back muscle impairments. Forty male volunteers (20 controls and 20 chronic low back pain patients) were assessed on three sessions at least 2 days apart within 2 weeks. Surface EMG signals were recorded from four pairs (bilaterally) of back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level, iliocostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10) while the subjects performed, in a static dynamometer, two static trunk extension tasks at 75% of the maximal voluntary contraction separated by a 60 s rest period: (1) a 30 s fatigue task and (2) a 5 s recovery task. Different EMG indices (based on individual muscles or averaged across bilateral homologous muscles or across all muscles) were computed to evaluate muscular fatigue and recovery. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) in percentage of the grand mean were calculated for each EMG variable. Reliable EMG indices are achieved for both healthy and chronic low back pain subjects when (1) electrodes are positioned on medial back muscles (multifidus at the L5 level and longissimus at L1) and (2) measures are averaged across bilateral muscles and/or across two fatigue tests performed within a session. The most reliable EMG indices were the bilateral average of medial back muscles (ICC range: 0.68-0.91; SEM range: 5-35%) and the average of all back muscles (ICC range: 0.77-0.91; SEM range: 5-30%). The averaging of measures across two fatigue tests is predicted to increase the reliability by about 13%. With regards to EMG indices of fatigue, the identification of the most fatigable muscle also lead to satisfactory results (ICC range: 0.74-0.79; SEM range: 21-26%). The assessment of back muscle impairments through EMG analysis necessitates the use of multiple electrodes to achieve reliable results.

UNLABELLED: The present study examined the prospective value of pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, and depression in the prediction of multisite musculoskeletal pain following experimentally induced delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS). The study sample consisted of 119 (63 females, 56 males) healthy university students. Measures of pain catastrophizing, fear of pain, and depression were completed prior to the DOMS induction procedure. Analyses revealed that pain catastrophizing and fear of pain prospectively predicted the experience of multisite pain following DOMS induction. Analyses also revealed that women were more likely to experience multisite pain than men. There was no significant relation between depressive symptoms and the experience of multisite pain. The discussion addresses the mechanisms by which pain catastrophizing and fear of pain might contribute to the spreading of pain. Clinical implications of the findings are also addressed. PERSPECTIVE: The results of this experimental study suggest that pain catastrophizing and fear of pain might increase the risk of developing multisite pain following musculoskeletal injury. ispartof: Journal Of Pain vol:15 issue:11 pages:1156-1165 ispartof: location:Maastricht, The Netherlands. status: published

This study aimed at testing the reliability and construct validity of a trunk perturbation protocol (TPP) that estimates the intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stiffness. The TPP consists of a series of pseudorandom position-controlled trunk perturbations in an apparatus measuring forces and displacements at the harness surrounding the thorax. Intrinsic and reflexive contributions to low-back stiffness were estimated using a system identification procedure, leading to 12 parameters. Study 1 methods (reliability): 30 subjects performed five 75-s trials, on each of two separate days (eight weeks apart). Reliability was assessed using the generalizability theory, which allowed computing indexes of dependability (ϕ, analogous to intraclass correlation coefficient) and standard errors of measurement (SEM). Study 2 methods (validity): 20 healthy subjects performed three 75-s trials for each of five experimental conditions assumed to provide different lumbar stiffness; testing the construct validity of the TPP using four conditions with different lumbar belt designs and one control condition without. Study 1 results (reliability): Learning was seen between the first and following trials. Consequently, reliability analyses were performed without the first trial. Simulations showed that averaging the scores of three trials can lead to acceptable reliability results for some TPP parameters. Study 2 results (validity): All lumbar belt designs increased low-back intrinsic stiffness, while only some of them decreased reflex stiffness, which support the construct validity of the TPP. Overall, these findings support the use of the TPP to test the effect of rehabilitation or between-groups differences with regards to trunk stiffness.

The purpose of this study was to determine, for different back muscles, if the median frequency (MF) of the electromyographic (EMG) power spectrum changes according to the position of the time window during a 5 s step contraction. Twenty males with no known back problems were standing upright in a dynamometer allowing lower limb and pelvis stabilization. Trunk extension efforts were performed by pushing on a force platform positioned at the T4 level while the extension moment at L5/S1 was displayed as visual feedback. The EMG signals from four homologous back muscles (multifidus at L5, ilicostalis lumborum at L3, and longissimus at L1 and T10) were collected using active surface electrodes during two 5 s static step contractions performed at five force levels (10, 20, 40, 60 and 80% of the maximal voluntary contraction). The root mean square (RMS) and MF values of the EMG signals corresponding to three 250 ms time windows (beginning, middle and end of each step contraction) were computed. The RMS values of several back muscles increased from the first to the third time window for contractions performed at high force levels only. However, a concomitant decrease in the MF values was observed only for the left multifidus muscle. It was concluded that muscle fatigue does not generally manifest itself during 5 s step contractions through the EMG signal. However, it is recommended to use step contractions lasting less than 5 s and to choose a time window located in the first 1-3 s to completely eliminate the possible effects of fatigue.

Objective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate different methods of estimating the body segment parameters and different methods of partitioning the trunk in order to reduce errors in the inverse dynamic analysis of lifting tasks. Design. The same data set was used to evaluate moment errors associated to five linked models differing by the way the trunk was modelled. Background. The inverse dynamic analysis of complex lifting tasks involving significant lower limb displacements requires the use of upper body linked models. However, the estimation of the body segment parameters of trunk segments and the flexible properties of the trunk can lead to errors when using this modelling approach. Methods. Twenty-one male subjects performed four lifting tasks. Five cameras, two force platforms and a dynamometric box provided inputs to five tridimensional (3D) dynamic linked models. Three modelling parameters of the trunk were tested in these models: (1) the use of a geometric or a proportional anthropometric model to estimate the body segment parameters of the trunk, (2) the location of the antero–posterior position of the centre of mass of the trunk segments (at a percentage of the trunk depth vs on a line between hips and shoulders), and (3) the partitioning of the trunk in two or three segments. The behavior of these linked models was assessed with three different error analyses. Results. The results revealed that all three modelling parameters of the trunk can reduce moment errors, especially when applied to subjects characterized by a larger abdomen. Conclusions. The inverse dynamic analysis of lifting tasks using an upper body modelling approach should take into consideration the interindividual variability inherent to the trunk morphology and non-rigidity. Relevance The trunk geometry and flexibility shows considerable variability among individuals. The use of upper body linked models requires adequate modelling of this segment to minimize errors in 3D inverse dynamic analysis of lifting tasks.

Background Research suggests that in some patients with low back pain, lumbar belts (LB) may derive secondary prophylactic benefits. It remains to be determined, however, which patients are most likely to benefit from prophylactic LB use, and which LB design is optimal for this purpose. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of different lumbar belts designs on range of motion and lumbopelvic rhythm. Methods Healthy subjects (10 males; 10 females) performed five standing lumbar flexion/extension cycles, with knees straight, during a control (no belt) and four lumbar belt experimental conditions (extensible, with and without dorsal and ventral panels; non-extensible). Motion of the pelvis and lumbar spine was measured with 3D angular inertial sensors. Results The results suggest that adding dorsal and ventral panels to an extensible LB produces the largest lumbar spine restrictions among the four tested lumbar belt designs, which in turn also altered the lumbopelvic rhythm. On a more exploratory basis, some sex differences were seen and the sex × experimental condition interaction just failed to reach significance. Conclusions LB may provide some biomechanical benefit for patients with low back disorders, based on the protection that may be provided against soft tissue creep-based injury mechanisms. More comprehensive assessment of different LB designs, with additional psychological and neuromuscular measurement outcomes, however, must first be conducted in order to produce sound recommendations for LB use. Future research should also to take sex into account, with sufficient statistical power to clearly refute or confirm the observed trends. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2474-15-307) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

This study examined the degree to which measures of spontaneous and movement-evoked pain accounted for shared or unique variance in functional disability associated with whiplash injury. The study also addressed the role of fear of movement as a mediator or moderator of the relation between different indices of pain and functional disability. Measures of spontaneous pain, single-point movement-evoked pain, repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain (RISP), and fear of movement and disability were obtained on a sample of 142 individuals who had sustained whiplash injuries. Participants' pain ratings, provided after lifting a weighted canister, were used as the index of single-point movement-evoked pain. RISP was computed as the increase in pain reported by participants over successive lifts of 18 weighted canisters. Measures of functional disability included physical lift tolerance and self-reported disability. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that measures of single-point movement-evoked pain and RISP accounted for significant unique variance in self-reported disability, beyond the variance accounted for by the measure of spontaneous pain. Only RISP accounted for significant unique variance in lift tolerance. The results suggest that measures of movement-evoked pain represent a disability-relevant dimension of pain that is not captured by measures of spontaneous pain. The clinical and conceptual implications of the findings are discussed. Perspective This study examined the degree to which measures of spontaneous and movement-evoked pain accounted for shared or unique variance in functional disability associated with whiplash injury. The findings suggest that approaches to the clinical evaluation of pain would benefit from the inclusion of measures of movement-evoked pain.

To assess the electromyographic (EMG) activation of trunk muscle during exertions performed in one primary plane (sagittal, frontal, transverse), we previously proposed a protocol allowing minimizing out-of-plane efforts (coupled moments – CMs) with the use of a static dynamometer combined with a visual feedback system. The aims of this study were to go further by testing motor learning and reliability issues related to such a protocol. Three identical sessions were conducted, where maximal voluntary contractions and submaximal ramp contractions were performed in six different directions while standing in the dynamometer. Two feedback conditions were tested, the simple 1D-feedback in the primary plane and the full 3D-feedback in all planes simultaneously. Surface EMG signals were collected from back and abdominal muscles and EMG amplitude and CMs were computed during the ramp contractions. Providing a 3D feedback to minimize CMs did not improve EMG reliability or in other words, did not reduce the within-subject variability. Providing three assessment days had practically no effect (no learning) on CMs and EMG variables. Overall, the reliability of EMG was at best moderate. However, although this limits its use on an individual basis, it still allows within- and between-group comparisons for research applications.

Forty-five manual material handlers (15 females, 15 expert males and 15 novice males) performed series of box transfers under conditions similar to those of large distribution centers. The objective of the study was to verify whether sex differences in joint motions and in back loading variables (L5/S1 moments) exist during multiple box transfers. The task consisted in transferring 24 15-kg boxes from one pallet to another (4 layers of boxes; 6 boxes/layer: 3 in the front row, 3 in the back) at a self-determined pace and then at an imposed pace of 9 lifts/min. Full-body 3D kinematic data were collected as well as external foot forces. A dynamic 3D linked segment model was used to estimate the net moments at L5/S1. The results show that the peak L5/S1 moment during lifting for females was significantly lower than for males, but once normalized to body size the difference disappeared. In general, the female workers were very close to the posture adopted by the novice males at the instant of the peak resultant moment. However, females were closer to the box than the male workers. One major sex difference was seen when lifting from the ground, with the use of interjoint coordination analyses. Female workers showed a sequential motion initiated by the knees, followed by the hip and the back, while expert males showed a more synchronized motion. The lifting strategy of females likely stretches lumbar spine passive tissues, which in turn put them at greater risk of back injuries. As observed in our previous studies, these differences between expert males, novice males and females are especially notable when the box is lifted from the ground.

Unexpected loading of the spine is a risk factor for low back pain. The trunk neuromuscular and kinematics responses are likely influenced by the perturbation itself as well as initial trunk conditions. The effect of four parameters (preload, sudden load, initial trunk flexed posture, initial abdominal antagonistic activity) on trunk kinematics and back muscles reflex response were evaluated. Twelve asymptomatic subjects participated in sudden forward perturbation tests under six distinct conditions. Preload did not change the reflexive response of back muscles and the trunk displacement; while peak trunk velocity and acceleration as well as the relative load peak decreased. Sudden load increased reflex response of muscles, trunk kinematics and loading variables. When the trunk was initially flexed, back muscles latency was delayed, trunk velocity and acceleration increased; however, reflex amplitude and relative trunk displacement remained unchanged. Abdominal antagonistic preactivation increased reflexive response of muscles but kinematics variables were not affected. Preload, initial flexed posture and abdominal muscles preactivation increased back muscles preactivity. Both velocity and acceleration peaks of the trunk movement decreased with preload despite greater total load. In contrast, they increased in the initial flexed posture and to some extent when abdominal muscles were preactivated demonstrating the distinct effects of pre-perturbation variables on trunk kinematics and risk of injury.

Introduction Adequate neuromuscular control of the lumbar spine is required to prevent lumbar injuries. A trunk postural stability test has been proposed earlier, using a chair wobbling on a central pivot and four springs with adjustable positions to modulate task difficulty. An inertial sensor is fixed on the chair to measure postural sway. The aim of this study is to assess the criterion validity and between-day reliability of the calibration and testing components. Methods Thirty six subjects (with and without low back pain) followed a calibration procedure, four practice trials and three 60-s trials on 2days. The criterion validity of the inertial sensor was tested against an optoelectronic system and a force platform. The reliability of 38 body sway measures obtained from the inertial sensor angular measures was estimated. Results The inertial sensor led to valid estimates of postural sway. The reliability of the calibration procedure was moderate. Practically no learning effect was detected except for a few body sway measures in patients with CLBP. Three 60-s trials provided acceptable reliability for approximately half of the body sway measures, although this is more difficult to achieve in patients with CLBP. Discussion The use of an easy to use inertial sensor led to valid measures of postural sway. A number of body sway measures were identified as reliable tools for individual follow-ups but inter-subject comparisons were anticipated as more difficult when patients with CLBP are involved.

Objective To (1) assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of different ultrasound (US) measures of the lumbar multifidus muscle in subjects with and without chronic low back pain and (2) test 3 different ways to enhance reliability, that is, by testing different tasks, using a template, and averaging trials within or between days. Design Cross-sectional repeated-measures design. Setting Laboratory setting. Patients Fifteen subjects with chronic low back pain and 15 control subjects. Methods Subjects (n = 30) performed contralateral arm lifting and contralateral leg lifting while in the prone position. Two 7-second videos of the lumbar multifidus (from rest to contraction) were collected with and without a template (transparency) to reposition the transducer on the skin. One of the two raters repeated the testing 7 to 14 days later to assess intrarater reliability in addition to inter-rater reliability. Reliability was assessed with the generalizability theory as a framework. Main outcome measurements US imaging measures of the lumbar multifidus thickness were obtained in patients at rest and during standardized contractions (hereafter called primary measures) at 2 vertebral levels and on both sides. These primary measures were used to calculate different, potentially useful US parameters (hereafter called derived measures). Results Intrarater reliability was better than inter-rater reliability, and primary measures were more reliable than derived measures. The tasks investigated showed comparable reliability results, and the use of the transducer position template was not effective to increase reliability. Averaging the measures of 3 images increased reliability substantially. Conclusions Optimal reliability requires the use of a single rater and the averaging of at least 3 images per visit. In these conditions, primary measures reach acceptable levels of reliability, which was more difficult to achieve for most derived measures. Arm or leg lifting tasks showed similar reliability, and thus the arm-lifting task is recommended for comparisons with previous studies. The use of a transducer position template is not recommended.

Objective To assess the reliability of ultrasound (US) measures of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle in a sample of subjects with and without specific chronic low back pain and to test whether reliability is enhanced by using different abdominal muscle activation tasks, with use of a foam cube for US transducer stabilization or by averaging 3 measures on the same image. Design Cross-sectional repeated-measures design. Setting Laboratory setting. Patients Fifteen subjects with chronic low back pain and 15 control subjects. Methods Subjects (n = 30) performed 3 tasks in the supine position: (1) contralateral straight leg raise (SLR), (2) bilateral hook-lying leg raising (HLR), and (3) abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) (control subjects only). Two 7-second videos of the right and left abdominal wall (from rest to contraction) were collected, with and without use of the foam cube. One of the 2 raters repeated the testing 7 to 14 days later to assess intrarater reliability. Main outcome measurements US imaging of abdominal muscles thickness. Results The TrA muscle was recruited preferentially in the ADIM task compared with the automatic tasks (SLR and HLR). The reliability was comparable among the 3 tasks, with intrarater reliability results being better than interrater reliability results. The use of the foam cube or averaging measures on the same image was generally not effective to increase reliability. Conclusions Although they are not as preferential in TrA recruitment as the ADIM, the SLR and HLR tasks showed comparable reliability results. The foam cube used to control transducer orientation and pressure and averaging measures on the same image had limited effect on reliability.

The objective of this study was to measure the effect size of three important factors in manual material handling, namely expertise, lifting height and weight lifted. The effect of expertise was evaluated by contrasting 15 expert and 15 novice handlers, the effect of the weight lifted with a 15-kg box and a 23-kg box and the effect of lifting height with two different box heights: ground level and a 32 cm height. The task consisted of transferring a series of boxes from a conveyor to a hand trolley. Lifting height and weight lifted had more effect size than expertise on external back loading variables (moments) while expertise had low impact. On the other hand, expertise showed a significant effect of posture variables on the lumbar spine and knees. All three factors are important, but for a reduction of external back loading, the focus should be on the lifting height and weight lifted.The objective was to measure the effect size of three important factors in a transfer of boxes from a conveyor to a hand trolley. Lifting height and weight lifted had more effect size than expertise on external back loading variables but expertise was a major determinant in back posture.

In this study we estimate the reliability of reflex response variables to identify the main sources of variability and to estimate appropriate measurement strategies to obtain more reliable measures. Back muscle surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded in healthy males during anteriorly-directed sudden loading perturbations applied to the trunk. Measures of EMG reflex latency and amplitude were obtained. The generalizability theory was used as a framework to estimate the magnitude of the different variance components and the reliability of the measures corresponding to various simulations of different measurement strategies. Reliability of the different variables was poor to moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient range 0-0.62). Averaging scores across homologous muscles and several trials were strategies to achieve more acceptable reliability. The reflex response of back muscles is inherently variable, and a large measurement effort is necessary to obtain reliable and, consequently, valid and responsive estimations of this neuromuscular function.

This study compared individuals with fibromyalgia (FM) and individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) on repetition-induced summation of activity-related pain (RISP). Fear of movement, pain catastrophizing and depression were examined as potential mediators of group differences. The sample consisted of 50 women with FM and 50 women with CLBP who were matched on age, pain severity and pain duration. Participants were asked to lift a series of 18 weighted canisters. In one trial, participants were asked to rate their pain after each lift. In a second trial, participants estimated the weight of each of the canisters. An index of repetition-induced summation of pain was derived as the change in pain ratings across repeated lifts. Analyses revealed that women with FM obtained higher scores on the index of RISP than women with CLBP. The heightened sensitivity to RISP in individuals with FM was not due to generalized hyperalgesia or a greater work output. Consistent with previous research, fear of movement was positively correlated with RISP. Pain disability was also associated with greater RISP, but not pain catastrophizing or depression. Discussion addresses the processes by which individuals with FM might have increased RISP responses. The findings of this study point to possible neurophysiological mechanisms that could help explain the high levels of pain-related disability seen in individuals with FM. Patients with fibromyalgia showed greater activity-related summation of pain than patients with chronic low back pain.

Study design An experimental and comparative study of chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and healthy controls. Objective To use a motivation-independent electromyography (EMG) based test of back muscle capacity to determine whether back muscle deconditioning is present in CLBP patients and whether it is related to pain-related psychological variables. Summary of background data The verification of the deconditioning syndrome in CLBP patients might be biased by the use of performance-based measures to assess physical fitness, especially in patients having fear of injury. Also, the use of lumbar-specific measures of physical fitness, such as back muscle strength and endurance, might be more sensitive to physical deconditioning than more general assessments such as aerobic capacity. Methods A time-limited submaximal fatigue test was performed by 27 nonspecific CLBP subjects (14 men) who had not had any surgery, and 31 healthy controls (17 men) while surface EMG signals were collected from back muscles. Motivation-independent EMG indices, which are sensitive to muscle fatigue or to activation patterns, were then computed and entered as input into previously developed regression equations to predict endurance (PTend) and strength (PStrength). Between-group comparisons were completed with patients divided in subgroups based on a median split of pain intensity, fear of movement, or pain catastrophizing scores. Results Differences between healthy and CLBP subgroups were mainly observed when patients were divided using pain catastrophizing scores (PCS). High-PCS patients showed significantly lower PTend than low-PCS patients. Various EMG indices showed comparable results to PTend. However, some of them also pointed out that the PCS-low patients were more fatigue-resistant and showed different activation patterns comparatively to healthy subjects. Conclusion These results suggest that physical deconditioning that is specific to back muscle capacity was present in a subgroup of patients while the opposite was observed in another subgroup, pain catastrophizing being related to this outcome. These findings support previous theoretical models of pain/disability.

In chronic low back pain patients (CLBP), neuromuscular and pain intensity have been identified as contributing factors in the disability of the individual. However, it is unclear whether pain intensity influences neuromuscular activation and if directed attention mediates this relationship. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of directed attention in individuals with different pain intensities on back extensor activation profiles. Fifty-four CLBP patients were separated into either high- or low-pain groups. Surface electromyograms were recorded from back muscles while the subjects performed a trunk flexion motion for four different attention conditions. Pattern recognition and repeated measures ANOVAs were used to examine the effect of sex, attention and pain intensity on temporal muscle activation patterns. The results showed that there was a significant sex × attention × pain interaction. The largest changes in muscle timing were observed in the low-pain group when their attention was focused on their pain, but the pattern of muscle activation differed between sexes. For males, a rapid decline in activation at mid-extension occurred, whereas females showed delayed activation at the beginning of extension. Overall, this study demonstrated that directed attention on pain had an effect on trunk muscle temporal recruitment, and that this relationship differed between sexes and pain groups. This suggests that sex-specific mechanisms may alter the neuromuscular control of the spine in CLBP patients for different pain levels.